Endoscopic ultrasound in idiopathic acute pancreatitis

Manish Tandon, Mark Topazian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

100 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the utility of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in patients with unexplained acute pancreatitis, and whether endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is subsequently needed. METHODS: Subjects who underwent EUS for assessment of idiopathic acute pancreatitis were identified, their medical records were reviewed, and they were contacted for a follow-up telephone interview. EUS diagnosis was compared with the final diagnosis and outcome. RESULTS: EUS revealed a cause of pancreatitis in 21 of the 31 subjects (68%), including microlithiasis in five (16%), chronic pancreatitis in 14 (45%), pancreas divisum in two (6.5%), pancreatic cancer in one (3.2%), and was not diagnostic in 10 (32%). During a mean follow-up period of 16 months, diagnosis changed in four subjects (13%), and nine subjects (29%) had ERCP because of persistent symptoms or recurrent pancreatitis. CONCLUSION: EUS, a less invasive test than ERCP, demonstrated an etiology in two-thirds of patients with idiopathic acute pancreatitis. Most patients did not require ERCP during the follow-up period. EUS can be an alternative to ERCP in patients with unexplained acute pancreatitis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)705-709
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology
Volume96
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 5 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Pancreatitis
Chronic Pancreatitis
Pancreatic Neoplasms
Medical Records
Pancreas
Interviews

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Endoscopic ultrasound in idiopathic acute pancreatitis. / Tandon, Manish; Topazian, Mark.

In: American Journal of Gastroenterology, Vol. 96, No. 3, 05.04.2001, p. 705-709.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3e65bbe3a80c4341b88da9e8cb4116c6,
title = "Endoscopic ultrasound in idiopathic acute pancreatitis",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the utility of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in patients with unexplained acute pancreatitis, and whether endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is subsequently needed. METHODS: Subjects who underwent EUS for assessment of idiopathic acute pancreatitis were identified, their medical records were reviewed, and they were contacted for a follow-up telephone interview. EUS diagnosis was compared with the final diagnosis and outcome. RESULTS: EUS revealed a cause of pancreatitis in 21 of the 31 subjects (68{\%}), including microlithiasis in five (16{\%}), chronic pancreatitis in 14 (45{\%}), pancreas divisum in two (6.5{\%}), pancreatic cancer in one (3.2{\%}), and was not diagnostic in 10 (32{\%}). During a mean follow-up period of 16 months, diagnosis changed in four subjects (13{\%}), and nine subjects (29{\%}) had ERCP because of persistent symptoms or recurrent pancreatitis. CONCLUSION: EUS, a less invasive test than ERCP, demonstrated an etiology in two-thirds of patients with idiopathic acute pancreatitis. Most patients did not require ERCP during the follow-up period. EUS can be an alternative to ERCP in patients with unexplained acute pancreatitis.",
author = "Manish Tandon and Mark Topazian",
year = "2001",
month = "4",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1016/S0002-9270(00)02402-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "96",
pages = "705--709",
journal = "American Journal of Gastroenterology",
issn = "0002-9270",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Endoscopic ultrasound in idiopathic acute pancreatitis

AU - Tandon, Manish

AU - Topazian, Mark

PY - 2001/4/5

Y1 - 2001/4/5

N2 - OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the utility of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in patients with unexplained acute pancreatitis, and whether endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is subsequently needed. METHODS: Subjects who underwent EUS for assessment of idiopathic acute pancreatitis were identified, their medical records were reviewed, and they were contacted for a follow-up telephone interview. EUS diagnosis was compared with the final diagnosis and outcome. RESULTS: EUS revealed a cause of pancreatitis in 21 of the 31 subjects (68%), including microlithiasis in five (16%), chronic pancreatitis in 14 (45%), pancreas divisum in two (6.5%), pancreatic cancer in one (3.2%), and was not diagnostic in 10 (32%). During a mean follow-up period of 16 months, diagnosis changed in four subjects (13%), and nine subjects (29%) had ERCP because of persistent symptoms or recurrent pancreatitis. CONCLUSION: EUS, a less invasive test than ERCP, demonstrated an etiology in two-thirds of patients with idiopathic acute pancreatitis. Most patients did not require ERCP during the follow-up period. EUS can be an alternative to ERCP in patients with unexplained acute pancreatitis.

AB - OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the utility of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in patients with unexplained acute pancreatitis, and whether endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is subsequently needed. METHODS: Subjects who underwent EUS for assessment of idiopathic acute pancreatitis were identified, their medical records were reviewed, and they were contacted for a follow-up telephone interview. EUS diagnosis was compared with the final diagnosis and outcome. RESULTS: EUS revealed a cause of pancreatitis in 21 of the 31 subjects (68%), including microlithiasis in five (16%), chronic pancreatitis in 14 (45%), pancreas divisum in two (6.5%), pancreatic cancer in one (3.2%), and was not diagnostic in 10 (32%). During a mean follow-up period of 16 months, diagnosis changed in four subjects (13%), and nine subjects (29%) had ERCP because of persistent symptoms or recurrent pancreatitis. CONCLUSION: EUS, a less invasive test than ERCP, demonstrated an etiology in two-thirds of patients with idiopathic acute pancreatitis. Most patients did not require ERCP during the follow-up period. EUS can be an alternative to ERCP in patients with unexplained acute pancreatitis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035071916&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035071916&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0002-9270(00)02402-3

DO - 10.1016/S0002-9270(00)02402-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 11280538

AN - SCOPUS:0035071916

VL - 96

SP - 705

EP - 709

JO - American Journal of Gastroenterology

JF - American Journal of Gastroenterology

SN - 0002-9270

IS - 3

ER -