Encoding strategies for three-direction phase-contrast MR imaging of flow.

N. J. Pelc, Matthew A Bernstein, A. Shimakawa, G. H. Glover

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

300 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Three encoding strategies for the measurement of flow velocities in arbitrary directions with phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging are presented; their noise and dynamic range performance are compared by means of theoretical analysis and computer simulation. A six-point measurement strategy is shown to be quite inefficient in terms of velocity variance per unit time. A simple four-point method exhibits equal dynamic range; its noise depends on flow direction but on average is equal to that of the six-point method. An alternate, balanced four-point method has noise that is direction independent and has, depending on implementation, possibly lower noise levels. Either four-point method is more efficient and is preferred over the six-point approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)405-413
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI
Volume1
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jul 1991
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Noise
Computer Simulation
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Direction compound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Encoding strategies for three-direction phase-contrast MR imaging of flow. / Pelc, N. J.; Bernstein, Matthew A; Shimakawa, A.; Glover, G. H.

In: Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, Vol. 1, No. 4, 07.1991, p. 405-413.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{211ba88a7702451797bcb5699aad7491,
title = "Encoding strategies for three-direction phase-contrast MR imaging of flow.",
abstract = "Three encoding strategies for the measurement of flow velocities in arbitrary directions with phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging are presented; their noise and dynamic range performance are compared by means of theoretical analysis and computer simulation. A six-point measurement strategy is shown to be quite inefficient in terms of velocity variance per unit time. A simple four-point method exhibits equal dynamic range; its noise depends on flow direction but on average is equal to that of the six-point method. An alternate, balanced four-point method has noise that is direction independent and has, depending on implementation, possibly lower noise levels. Either four-point method is more efficient and is preferred over the six-point approach.",
author = "Pelc, {N. J.} and Bernstein, {Matthew A} and A. Shimakawa and Glover, {G. H.}",
year = "1991",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "405--413",
journal = "Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging",
issn = "1053-1807",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Encoding strategies for three-direction phase-contrast MR imaging of flow.

AU - Pelc, N. J.

AU - Bernstein, Matthew A

AU - Shimakawa, A.

AU - Glover, G. H.

PY - 1991/7

Y1 - 1991/7

N2 - Three encoding strategies for the measurement of flow velocities in arbitrary directions with phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging are presented; their noise and dynamic range performance are compared by means of theoretical analysis and computer simulation. A six-point measurement strategy is shown to be quite inefficient in terms of velocity variance per unit time. A simple four-point method exhibits equal dynamic range; its noise depends on flow direction but on average is equal to that of the six-point method. An alternate, balanced four-point method has noise that is direction independent and has, depending on implementation, possibly lower noise levels. Either four-point method is more efficient and is preferred over the six-point approach.

AB - Three encoding strategies for the measurement of flow velocities in arbitrary directions with phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging are presented; their noise and dynamic range performance are compared by means of theoretical analysis and computer simulation. A six-point measurement strategy is shown to be quite inefficient in terms of velocity variance per unit time. A simple four-point method exhibits equal dynamic range; its noise depends on flow direction but on average is equal to that of the six-point method. An alternate, balanced four-point method has noise that is direction independent and has, depending on implementation, possibly lower noise levels. Either four-point method is more efficient and is preferred over the six-point approach.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026182092&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026182092&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 1790362

AN - SCOPUS:0026182092

VL - 1

SP - 405

EP - 413

JO - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

JF - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

SN - 1053-1807

IS - 4

ER -