Effort issues in post-acute outpatient acquired brain injury rehabilitation seekers

Dona E Locke, Jeffrey S. Smigielski, Matthew R. Powell, Susanna R. Stevens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent findings suggest that compromised patient effort occurs in nonlitigious settings, but the nature and base rate of suboptimal effort in these settings remains poorly understood. In the treatment-seeking, acquired brain injury, outpatient rehabilitation sample included in this investigation, 21.8% of the patients scored below recommended cutting scores for suboptimal effort on the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM). Disability status was the only variable explored in this study to be associated with suboptimal effort. It should be noted, however, that the proportion of patients on disability was large in both the optimal and suboptimal effort groups, suggesting that failure on the TOMM may not be a specific predictor of disability status in this sample. Importantly, performance on the TOMM was unrelated to age, education, time from injury to evaluation, and injury severity. Depression and anxiety were also shown to be unrelated to TOMM performance in this rehabilitation sample. As expected, performance on neurocognitive testing was significantly lower in the suboptimal effort group. This study suggests that reduced effort occurs outside forensic settings, is related to neuropsychometric performance, and urges further research into effort across various settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)273-281
Number of pages9
JournalNeuroRehabilitation
Volume23
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Malingering
Brain Injuries
Outpatients
Rehabilitation
Wounds and Injuries
Anxiety
Depression
Education
Research

Keywords

  • Acquired brain injury
  • Effort
  • Neurorehabilitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

Locke, D. E., Smigielski, J. S., Powell, M. R., & Stevens, S. R. (2008). Effort issues in post-acute outpatient acquired brain injury rehabilitation seekers. NeuroRehabilitation, 23(3), 273-281.

Effort issues in post-acute outpatient acquired brain injury rehabilitation seekers. / Locke, Dona E; Smigielski, Jeffrey S.; Powell, Matthew R.; Stevens, Susanna R.

In: NeuroRehabilitation, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2008, p. 273-281.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Locke, DE, Smigielski, JS, Powell, MR & Stevens, SR 2008, 'Effort issues in post-acute outpatient acquired brain injury rehabilitation seekers', NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 273-281.
Locke, Dona E ; Smigielski, Jeffrey S. ; Powell, Matthew R. ; Stevens, Susanna R. / Effort issues in post-acute outpatient acquired brain injury rehabilitation seekers. In: NeuroRehabilitation. 2008 ; Vol. 23, No. 3. pp. 273-281.
@article{35803df1f6a64923ba8d79eb4d297cf9,
title = "Effort issues in post-acute outpatient acquired brain injury rehabilitation seekers",
abstract = "Recent findings suggest that compromised patient effort occurs in nonlitigious settings, but the nature and base rate of suboptimal effort in these settings remains poorly understood. In the treatment-seeking, acquired brain injury, outpatient rehabilitation sample included in this investigation, 21.8{\%} of the patients scored below recommended cutting scores for suboptimal effort on the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM). Disability status was the only variable explored in this study to be associated with suboptimal effort. It should be noted, however, that the proportion of patients on disability was large in both the optimal and suboptimal effort groups, suggesting that failure on the TOMM may not be a specific predictor of disability status in this sample. Importantly, performance on the TOMM was unrelated to age, education, time from injury to evaluation, and injury severity. Depression and anxiety were also shown to be unrelated to TOMM performance in this rehabilitation sample. As expected, performance on neurocognitive testing was significantly lower in the suboptimal effort group. This study suggests that reduced effort occurs outside forensic settings, is related to neuropsychometric performance, and urges further research into effort across various settings.",
keywords = "Acquired brain injury, Effort, Neurorehabilitation",
author = "Locke, {Dona E} and Smigielski, {Jeffrey S.} and Powell, {Matthew R.} and Stevens, {Susanna R.}",
year = "2008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "273--281",
journal = "NeuroRehabilitation",
issn = "1053-8135",
publisher = "IOS Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effort issues in post-acute outpatient acquired brain injury rehabilitation seekers

AU - Locke, Dona E

AU - Smigielski, Jeffrey S.

AU - Powell, Matthew R.

AU - Stevens, Susanna R.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Recent findings suggest that compromised patient effort occurs in nonlitigious settings, but the nature and base rate of suboptimal effort in these settings remains poorly understood. In the treatment-seeking, acquired brain injury, outpatient rehabilitation sample included in this investigation, 21.8% of the patients scored below recommended cutting scores for suboptimal effort on the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM). Disability status was the only variable explored in this study to be associated with suboptimal effort. It should be noted, however, that the proportion of patients on disability was large in both the optimal and suboptimal effort groups, suggesting that failure on the TOMM may not be a specific predictor of disability status in this sample. Importantly, performance on the TOMM was unrelated to age, education, time from injury to evaluation, and injury severity. Depression and anxiety were also shown to be unrelated to TOMM performance in this rehabilitation sample. As expected, performance on neurocognitive testing was significantly lower in the suboptimal effort group. This study suggests that reduced effort occurs outside forensic settings, is related to neuropsychometric performance, and urges further research into effort across various settings.

AB - Recent findings suggest that compromised patient effort occurs in nonlitigious settings, but the nature and base rate of suboptimal effort in these settings remains poorly understood. In the treatment-seeking, acquired brain injury, outpatient rehabilitation sample included in this investigation, 21.8% of the patients scored below recommended cutting scores for suboptimal effort on the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM). Disability status was the only variable explored in this study to be associated with suboptimal effort. It should be noted, however, that the proportion of patients on disability was large in both the optimal and suboptimal effort groups, suggesting that failure on the TOMM may not be a specific predictor of disability status in this sample. Importantly, performance on the TOMM was unrelated to age, education, time from injury to evaluation, and injury severity. Depression and anxiety were also shown to be unrelated to TOMM performance in this rehabilitation sample. As expected, performance on neurocognitive testing was significantly lower in the suboptimal effort group. This study suggests that reduced effort occurs outside forensic settings, is related to neuropsychometric performance, and urges further research into effort across various settings.

KW - Acquired brain injury

KW - Effort

KW - Neurorehabilitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=47849125946&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=47849125946&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 273

EP - 281

JO - NeuroRehabilitation

JF - NeuroRehabilitation

SN - 1053-8135

IS - 3

ER -