Effects of joint contracture on the contralateral unoperated limb in a rabbit knee contracture model: A biomechanical and genetic study

Matthew Abdel, Mark E. Morrey, Diane E. Grill, Christopher P. Kolbert, Kai Nan An, Scott P. Steinmann, Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo, Bernard F. Morrey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In most animal models, unoperated contralateral limbs are used as controls. However, in some experimental circumstances, the contralateral limb may represent a skewed control. The main purpose of this study was to determine if the unoperated contralateral limb could be used as a control, or if a different unoperated animal's limb should be used instead. Seventeen rabbits were divided into two groups. Group 1 rabbits (n = 12) underwent surgery on their right limbs to induce a contracture. Group 2 rabbits (n = 5) underwent no surgery. The left non-operated limbs of rabbits in group 1 were biomechanically and genetically compared to the limbs of unoperated rabbits in group 2 with the use of a validated joint measuring device and custom microarray, respectively. After 8 weeks of immobilization, there was a statistically greater flexion contracture in the unoperated contralateral limbs compared to the limbs of animals that received no surgery(8.4 ± 8.9° vs. 0 ± 0°; p-value = 0.03). When animals were remobilized for an additional 16 weeks, the significance between groups was lost (11.9 ± 21.4° vs. 8.9 ± 9.5°; p = 0.38). Similarly, there was a statistically significant increase in nine genes at 8 weeks (p < 0.001). However, at 24 weeks, only the PMCA 1 gene was statically increased (p < 0.001). In our rabbit model, the non-operated limb develops a small flexion contracture at 8 weeks. After 16 weeks of remobilization, there is no biomechanical or genetic difference between contralateral non-operated limbs and limbs of animals not undergoing any surgical intervention. Given the biomechanical and genetic findings, the contralateral non-operated limb can be used as a valid control. ©

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1581-1585
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Orthopaedic Research
Volume30
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2012

Fingerprint

Contracture
Knee
Extremities
Joints
Rabbits
Immobilization
Genes
Animal Models

Keywords

  • biomechanics
  • contralateral limbs
  • genetic variation
  • joint contractures
  • rabbit model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Effects of joint contracture on the contralateral unoperated limb in a rabbit knee contracture model : A biomechanical and genetic study. / Abdel, Matthew; Morrey, Mark E.; Grill, Diane E.; Kolbert, Christopher P.; An, Kai Nan; Steinmann, Scott P.; Sanchez-Sotelo, Joaquin; Morrey, Bernard F.

In: Journal of Orthopaedic Research, Vol. 30, No. 10, 10.2012, p. 1581-1585.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abdel, Matthew ; Morrey, Mark E. ; Grill, Diane E. ; Kolbert, Christopher P. ; An, Kai Nan ; Steinmann, Scott P. ; Sanchez-Sotelo, Joaquin ; Morrey, Bernard F. / Effects of joint contracture on the contralateral unoperated limb in a rabbit knee contracture model : A biomechanical and genetic study. In: Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 2012 ; Vol. 30, No. 10. pp. 1581-1585.
@article{4b552281883c4db385fde9be01a8ae12,
title = "Effects of joint contracture on the contralateral unoperated limb in a rabbit knee contracture model: A biomechanical and genetic study",
abstract = "In most animal models, unoperated contralateral limbs are used as controls. However, in some experimental circumstances, the contralateral limb may represent a skewed control. The main purpose of this study was to determine if the unoperated contralateral limb could be used as a control, or if a different unoperated animal's limb should be used instead. Seventeen rabbits were divided into two groups. Group 1 rabbits (n = 12) underwent surgery on their right limbs to induce a contracture. Group 2 rabbits (n = 5) underwent no surgery. The left non-operated limbs of rabbits in group 1 were biomechanically and genetically compared to the limbs of unoperated rabbits in group 2 with the use of a validated joint measuring device and custom microarray, respectively. After 8 weeks of immobilization, there was a statistically greater flexion contracture in the unoperated contralateral limbs compared to the limbs of animals that received no surgery(8.4 ± 8.9° vs. 0 ± 0°; p-value = 0.03). When animals were remobilized for an additional 16 weeks, the significance between groups was lost (11.9 ± 21.4° vs. 8.9 ± 9.5°; p = 0.38). Similarly, there was a statistically significant increase in nine genes at 8 weeks (p < 0.001). However, at 24 weeks, only the PMCA 1 gene was statically increased (p < 0.001). In our rabbit model, the non-operated limb develops a small flexion contracture at 8 weeks. After 16 weeks of remobilization, there is no biomechanical or genetic difference between contralateral non-operated limbs and limbs of animals not undergoing any surgical intervention. Given the biomechanical and genetic findings, the contralateral non-operated limb can be used as a valid control. {\circledC}",
keywords = "biomechanics, contralateral limbs, genetic variation, joint contractures, rabbit model",
author = "Matthew Abdel and Morrey, {Mark E.} and Grill, {Diane E.} and Kolbert, {Christopher P.} and An, {Kai Nan} and Steinmann, {Scott P.} and Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo and Morrey, {Bernard F.}",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1002/jor.22106",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "1581--1585",
journal = "Journal of Orthopaedic Research",
issn = "0736-0266",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of joint contracture on the contralateral unoperated limb in a rabbit knee contracture model

T2 - A biomechanical and genetic study

AU - Abdel, Matthew

AU - Morrey, Mark E.

AU - Grill, Diane E.

AU - Kolbert, Christopher P.

AU - An, Kai Nan

AU - Steinmann, Scott P.

AU - Sanchez-Sotelo, Joaquin

AU - Morrey, Bernard F.

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - In most animal models, unoperated contralateral limbs are used as controls. However, in some experimental circumstances, the contralateral limb may represent a skewed control. The main purpose of this study was to determine if the unoperated contralateral limb could be used as a control, or if a different unoperated animal's limb should be used instead. Seventeen rabbits were divided into two groups. Group 1 rabbits (n = 12) underwent surgery on their right limbs to induce a contracture. Group 2 rabbits (n = 5) underwent no surgery. The left non-operated limbs of rabbits in group 1 were biomechanically and genetically compared to the limbs of unoperated rabbits in group 2 with the use of a validated joint measuring device and custom microarray, respectively. After 8 weeks of immobilization, there was a statistically greater flexion contracture in the unoperated contralateral limbs compared to the limbs of animals that received no surgery(8.4 ± 8.9° vs. 0 ± 0°; p-value = 0.03). When animals were remobilized for an additional 16 weeks, the significance between groups was lost (11.9 ± 21.4° vs. 8.9 ± 9.5°; p = 0.38). Similarly, there was a statistically significant increase in nine genes at 8 weeks (p < 0.001). However, at 24 weeks, only the PMCA 1 gene was statically increased (p < 0.001). In our rabbit model, the non-operated limb develops a small flexion contracture at 8 weeks. After 16 weeks of remobilization, there is no biomechanical or genetic difference between contralateral non-operated limbs and limbs of animals not undergoing any surgical intervention. Given the biomechanical and genetic findings, the contralateral non-operated limb can be used as a valid control. ©

AB - In most animal models, unoperated contralateral limbs are used as controls. However, in some experimental circumstances, the contralateral limb may represent a skewed control. The main purpose of this study was to determine if the unoperated contralateral limb could be used as a control, or if a different unoperated animal's limb should be used instead. Seventeen rabbits were divided into two groups. Group 1 rabbits (n = 12) underwent surgery on their right limbs to induce a contracture. Group 2 rabbits (n = 5) underwent no surgery. The left non-operated limbs of rabbits in group 1 were biomechanically and genetically compared to the limbs of unoperated rabbits in group 2 with the use of a validated joint measuring device and custom microarray, respectively. After 8 weeks of immobilization, there was a statistically greater flexion contracture in the unoperated contralateral limbs compared to the limbs of animals that received no surgery(8.4 ± 8.9° vs. 0 ± 0°; p-value = 0.03). When animals were remobilized for an additional 16 weeks, the significance between groups was lost (11.9 ± 21.4° vs. 8.9 ± 9.5°; p = 0.38). Similarly, there was a statistically significant increase in nine genes at 8 weeks (p < 0.001). However, at 24 weeks, only the PMCA 1 gene was statically increased (p < 0.001). In our rabbit model, the non-operated limb develops a small flexion contracture at 8 weeks. After 16 weeks of remobilization, there is no biomechanical or genetic difference between contralateral non-operated limbs and limbs of animals not undergoing any surgical intervention. Given the biomechanical and genetic findings, the contralateral non-operated limb can be used as a valid control. ©

KW - biomechanics

KW - contralateral limbs

KW - genetic variation

KW - joint contractures

KW - rabbit model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865493702&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865493702&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jor.22106

DO - 10.1002/jor.22106

M3 - Article

C2 - 22457083

AN - SCOPUS:84865493702

VL - 30

SP - 1581

EP - 1585

JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Research

JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Research

SN - 0736-0266

IS - 10

ER -