Effects of auditory distraction on cognitive processing of young adults

Leonard L. LaPointe, Gary R. Heald, Julie Stierwalt, Brett E. Kemker, Trisha Maurice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The effects of interference, competition, and distraction on cognitive processing are unclearly understood, particularly regarding type and intensity of auditory distraction across a variety of cognitive processing tasks. Method: The purpose of this investigation was to report two experiments that sought to explore the effects of types of distraction (4-talker babble; word repetition; combined 4-talker babble with word repetition) when compared to a control condition of quiet on a range of computerized measures (simple reaction time; choice reaction time; serial pattern matching; lexical decision-making; visual selective attention; response reversal and rapid visual scanning; and form discrimination) in 40 young adults (Experiment 1). Results: Few distraction effects were found on cognitive processing at the comfortable loudness level (40dB SL). In Experiment 2, statistically significant differences for choice reaction time and serial pattern matching (working memory) were found in both speed and accuracy when distractions were presented at perceived uncomfortable loudness levels (ULL) and compared with conditions of quiet and comfortable loudness level (40dB SL). Conclusion: Cognitive resource allocation models may be useful in interpreting the effects of auditory distraction on cognitive-linguistic processing, and this model may help to explain differential distraction effects in clinical populations with attention deficits.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)398-409
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Attention Disorders
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Reaction Time
Young Adult
Resource Allocation
Linguistics
Short-Term Memory
Decision Making
Population
Discrimination (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Distraction
  • Intensity
  • Reaction time
  • Uncomfortable loudness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Effects of auditory distraction on cognitive processing of young adults. / LaPointe, Leonard L.; Heald, Gary R.; Stierwalt, Julie; Kemker, Brett E.; Maurice, Trisha.

In: Journal of Attention Disorders, Vol. 10, No. 4, 01.05.2007, p. 398-409.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

LaPointe, Leonard L. ; Heald, Gary R. ; Stierwalt, Julie ; Kemker, Brett E. ; Maurice, Trisha. / Effects of auditory distraction on cognitive processing of young adults. In: Journal of Attention Disorders. 2007 ; Vol. 10, No. 4. pp. 398-409.
@article{99651c99dc2e42e4aa4ad19023e4d719,
title = "Effects of auditory distraction on cognitive processing of young adults",
abstract = "Objective: The effects of interference, competition, and distraction on cognitive processing are unclearly understood, particularly regarding type and intensity of auditory distraction across a variety of cognitive processing tasks. Method: The purpose of this investigation was to report two experiments that sought to explore the effects of types of distraction (4-talker babble; word repetition; combined 4-talker babble with word repetition) when compared to a control condition of quiet on a range of computerized measures (simple reaction time; choice reaction time; serial pattern matching; lexical decision-making; visual selective attention; response reversal and rapid visual scanning; and form discrimination) in 40 young adults (Experiment 1). Results: Few distraction effects were found on cognitive processing at the comfortable loudness level (40dB SL). In Experiment 2, statistically significant differences for choice reaction time and serial pattern matching (working memory) were found in both speed and accuracy when distractions were presented at perceived uncomfortable loudness levels (ULL) and compared with conditions of quiet and comfortable loudness level (40dB SL). Conclusion: Cognitive resource allocation models may be useful in interpreting the effects of auditory distraction on cognitive-linguistic processing, and this model may help to explain differential distraction effects in clinical populations with attention deficits.",
keywords = "Distraction, Intensity, Reaction time, Uncomfortable loudness",
author = "LaPointe, {Leonard L.} and Heald, {Gary R.} and Julie Stierwalt and Kemker, {Brett E.} and Trisha Maurice",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1087054706293221",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "398--409",
journal = "Journal of Attention Disorders",
issn = "1087-0547",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of auditory distraction on cognitive processing of young adults

AU - LaPointe, Leonard L.

AU - Heald, Gary R.

AU - Stierwalt, Julie

AU - Kemker, Brett E.

AU - Maurice, Trisha

PY - 2007/5/1

Y1 - 2007/5/1

N2 - Objective: The effects of interference, competition, and distraction on cognitive processing are unclearly understood, particularly regarding type and intensity of auditory distraction across a variety of cognitive processing tasks. Method: The purpose of this investigation was to report two experiments that sought to explore the effects of types of distraction (4-talker babble; word repetition; combined 4-talker babble with word repetition) when compared to a control condition of quiet on a range of computerized measures (simple reaction time; choice reaction time; serial pattern matching; lexical decision-making; visual selective attention; response reversal and rapid visual scanning; and form discrimination) in 40 young adults (Experiment 1). Results: Few distraction effects were found on cognitive processing at the comfortable loudness level (40dB SL). In Experiment 2, statistically significant differences for choice reaction time and serial pattern matching (working memory) were found in both speed and accuracy when distractions were presented at perceived uncomfortable loudness levels (ULL) and compared with conditions of quiet and comfortable loudness level (40dB SL). Conclusion: Cognitive resource allocation models may be useful in interpreting the effects of auditory distraction on cognitive-linguistic processing, and this model may help to explain differential distraction effects in clinical populations with attention deficits.

AB - Objective: The effects of interference, competition, and distraction on cognitive processing are unclearly understood, particularly regarding type and intensity of auditory distraction across a variety of cognitive processing tasks. Method: The purpose of this investigation was to report two experiments that sought to explore the effects of types of distraction (4-talker babble; word repetition; combined 4-talker babble with word repetition) when compared to a control condition of quiet on a range of computerized measures (simple reaction time; choice reaction time; serial pattern matching; lexical decision-making; visual selective attention; response reversal and rapid visual scanning; and form discrimination) in 40 young adults (Experiment 1). Results: Few distraction effects were found on cognitive processing at the comfortable loudness level (40dB SL). In Experiment 2, statistically significant differences for choice reaction time and serial pattern matching (working memory) were found in both speed and accuracy when distractions were presented at perceived uncomfortable loudness levels (ULL) and compared with conditions of quiet and comfortable loudness level (40dB SL). Conclusion: Cognitive resource allocation models may be useful in interpreting the effects of auditory distraction on cognitive-linguistic processing, and this model may help to explain differential distraction effects in clinical populations with attention deficits.

KW - Distraction

KW - Intensity

KW - Reaction time

KW - Uncomfortable loudness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247235105&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34247235105&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1087054706293221

DO - 10.1177/1087054706293221

M3 - Article

C2 - 17449839

AN - SCOPUS:34247235105

VL - 10

SP - 398

EP - 409

JO - Journal of Attention Disorders

JF - Journal of Attention Disorders

SN - 1087-0547

IS - 4

ER -