TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of a reduced dose schedule and intramuscular administration of anthrax vaccine adsorbed on immunogenicity and safety at 7 months
T2 - A randomized trial
AU - Marano, Nina
AU - Plikaytis, Brian D.
AU - Martin, Stacey W.
AU - Rose, Charles
AU - Semenova, Vera A.
AU - Martin, Sandra K.
AU - Freeman, Alison E.
AU - Li, Han
AU - Mulligan, Mark J.
AU - Parker, Scott D.
AU - Babcock, Janiine
AU - Keitel, Wendy
AU - El Sahly, Hana
AU - Poland, Gregory A.
AU - Jacobson, Robert M.
AU - Keyserling, Harry L.
AU - Soroka, Stephen D.
AU - Fox, Sarah P.
AU - Stamper, John L.
AU - McNeil, Michael M.
AU - Perkins, Bradley A.
AU - Messonnier, Nancy
AU - Quinn, Conrad P.
PY - 2008/10/1
Y1 - 2008/10/1
N2 - Context: In 1999, the US Congress directed the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to conduct a pivotal safety and efficacy study of anthrax vaccine adsorbed (AVA). Objective: To determine the effects on serological responses and injection site adverse events (AEs) resulting from changing the route of administration of AVA from subcutaneous (SQ) to intramuscular (IM) and omitting the week 2 dose from the licensed schedule. Design, Setting, and Participants: Assessment of the first 1005 enrollees in a multisite, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority, phase 4 human clinical trial (ongoing from May 2002). Intervention: Healthy adults received AVA by the SQ (reference group) or IM route at 0, 2, and 4 weeks and 6 months (4-SQ or 4-IM; n=165-170 per group) or at a reduced 3-dose schedule (3-IM; n=501). A control group (n=169) received saline injections at the same time intervals. Main Outcome Measures: Noninferiority at week 8 and month 7 of anti-protective antigen IgG geometric mean concentration (GMC), geometric mean titer (GMT), and proportion of responders with a 4-fold rise in titer (%4xR). Reactogenicity outcomes were proportions of injection site and systemic AEs. Results: At week 8, the 4-IM group (GMC, 90.8 μg/mL; GMT, 1114.8; %4xR, 97.7) was noninferior to the 4-SQ group (GMC, 105.1 μg/mL; GMT, 1315.4;%4xR, 98.8) for all 3 primary end points. The 3-IM group was noninferior for only the%4xR (GMC, 52.2 μg/mL; GMT,650.6;%4xR, 94.4). At month 7, all groups were noninferior to the licensed regimen for all end points. Solicited injection site AEs assessed during examinations occurred at lower proportions in the 4-IM group compared with 4-SQ. The odds ratio for ordinal end point pain reported immediately after injection was reduced by 50% for the 4-IM vs 4-SQ groups (P < .001). Route of administration did not significantly influence the occurrence of systemic AEs. Conclusions: The 4-IM and 3-IM regimens of AVA provided noninferior immunological priming by month 7 when compared with the 4-SQ licensed regimen. Intramuscular administration significantly reduced the occurrence of injection site AEs. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00119067.
AB - Context: In 1999, the US Congress directed the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to conduct a pivotal safety and efficacy study of anthrax vaccine adsorbed (AVA). Objective: To determine the effects on serological responses and injection site adverse events (AEs) resulting from changing the route of administration of AVA from subcutaneous (SQ) to intramuscular (IM) and omitting the week 2 dose from the licensed schedule. Design, Setting, and Participants: Assessment of the first 1005 enrollees in a multisite, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority, phase 4 human clinical trial (ongoing from May 2002). Intervention: Healthy adults received AVA by the SQ (reference group) or IM route at 0, 2, and 4 weeks and 6 months (4-SQ or 4-IM; n=165-170 per group) or at a reduced 3-dose schedule (3-IM; n=501). A control group (n=169) received saline injections at the same time intervals. Main Outcome Measures: Noninferiority at week 8 and month 7 of anti-protective antigen IgG geometric mean concentration (GMC), geometric mean titer (GMT), and proportion of responders with a 4-fold rise in titer (%4xR). Reactogenicity outcomes were proportions of injection site and systemic AEs. Results: At week 8, the 4-IM group (GMC, 90.8 μg/mL; GMT, 1114.8; %4xR, 97.7) was noninferior to the 4-SQ group (GMC, 105.1 μg/mL; GMT, 1315.4;%4xR, 98.8) for all 3 primary end points. The 3-IM group was noninferior for only the%4xR (GMC, 52.2 μg/mL; GMT,650.6;%4xR, 94.4). At month 7, all groups were noninferior to the licensed regimen for all end points. Solicited injection site AEs assessed during examinations occurred at lower proportions in the 4-IM group compared with 4-SQ. The odds ratio for ordinal end point pain reported immediately after injection was reduced by 50% for the 4-IM vs 4-SQ groups (P < .001). Route of administration did not significantly influence the occurrence of systemic AEs. Conclusions: The 4-IM and 3-IM regimens of AVA provided noninferior immunological priming by month 7 when compared with the 4-SQ licensed regimen. Intramuscular administration significantly reduced the occurrence of injection site AEs. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00119067.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=54849158900&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=54849158900&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jama.300.13.1532
DO - 10.1001/jama.300.13.1532
M3 - Article
C2 - 18827210
AN - SCOPUS:54849158900
SN - 0002-9955
VL - 300
SP - 1532
EP - 1543
JO - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association
JF - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association
IS - 13
ER -