Effect of premium, copayments, and health status on the choice of health plans

James M Naessens, Mahmud Khan, Nilay D Shah, Amy Wagie, Rebecca A. Pautz, Claudia R. Campbell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Explore effects of comorbidity and prior health care utilization on choice of employee health plans with different levels of cost sharing. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Mayo Clinic employees in Rochester, Minnesota (MCR) under age 65 in January 2004; N = 20,379. STUDY DESIGN: Assessment of a natural experiment where self-funded medical care benefit options were changed to contain costs within a large medical group practice. Before the change, most employees were enrolled in a plan with first dollar coverage, while 18% had a plan with copays and deductibles. In 2004, 3 existing plans were replaced by 2 new options, one with lower premiums and higher out-of-pocket costs and the other with higher premiums, a lower coinsurance rate, and lower out-of-pocket maximums. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Data on employees were merged across insurance claims, medical records, eligibility files, and employment files for 2003 and 2004. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:: As the number of chronic comorbidities among family members increased, the probability of choosing high-premium option also increased. Seventy-two percent of employees with at least 1 family member with comorbidity chose the high-cost option versus 54.7% of employees with no comorbidities. High-premium and low-premium plans seem to subdivide population into discrete risk categories, which may adversely affect the future stability of the insurance plan options. CONCLUSIONS: Various factors affect decision making of employees regarding the choice of plan with different levels of cost-sharing. In a natural experiment setting where all options were redesigned, the health status of employees and their dependents played a very significant role in plan choice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1033-1040
Number of pages8
JournalMedical Care
Volume46
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2008

Fingerprint

Health Status
Comorbidity
Deductibles and Coinsurance
Cost Sharing
Health
Insurance
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Costs and Cost Analysis
Group Practice
Occupational Health
Health Expenditures
Medical Records
Decision Making
Population

Keywords

  • Comorbidity
  • Cost sharing
  • Health plan options
  • Selection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Effect of premium, copayments, and health status on the choice of health plans. / Naessens, James M; Khan, Mahmud; Shah, Nilay D; Wagie, Amy; Pautz, Rebecca A.; Campbell, Claudia R.

In: Medical Care, Vol. 46, No. 10, 10.2008, p. 1033-1040.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Naessens, James M ; Khan, Mahmud ; Shah, Nilay D ; Wagie, Amy ; Pautz, Rebecca A. ; Campbell, Claudia R. / Effect of premium, copayments, and health status on the choice of health plans. In: Medical Care. 2008 ; Vol. 46, No. 10. pp. 1033-1040.
@article{137d18899f6844398738cbb1798255a5,
title = "Effect of premium, copayments, and health status on the choice of health plans",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Explore effects of comorbidity and prior health care utilization on choice of employee health plans with different levels of cost sharing. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Mayo Clinic employees in Rochester, Minnesota (MCR) under age 65 in January 2004; N = 20,379. STUDY DESIGN: Assessment of a natural experiment where self-funded medical care benefit options were changed to contain costs within a large medical group practice. Before the change, most employees were enrolled in a plan with first dollar coverage, while 18{\%} had a plan with copays and deductibles. In 2004, 3 existing plans were replaced by 2 new options, one with lower premiums and higher out-of-pocket costs and the other with higher premiums, a lower coinsurance rate, and lower out-of-pocket maximums. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Data on employees were merged across insurance claims, medical records, eligibility files, and employment files for 2003 and 2004. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:: As the number of chronic comorbidities among family members increased, the probability of choosing high-premium option also increased. Seventy-two percent of employees with at least 1 family member with comorbidity chose the high-cost option versus 54.7{\%} of employees with no comorbidities. High-premium and low-premium plans seem to subdivide population into discrete risk categories, which may adversely affect the future stability of the insurance plan options. CONCLUSIONS: Various factors affect decision making of employees regarding the choice of plan with different levels of cost-sharing. In a natural experiment setting where all options were redesigned, the health status of employees and their dependents played a very significant role in plan choice.",
keywords = "Comorbidity, Cost sharing, Health plan options, Selection",
author = "Naessens, {James M} and Mahmud Khan and Shah, {Nilay D} and Amy Wagie and Pautz, {Rebecca A.} and Campbell, {Claudia R.}",
year = "2008",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1097/MLR.0b013e318185cdac",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "1033--1040",
journal = "Medical Care",
issn = "0025-7079",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of premium, copayments, and health status on the choice of health plans

AU - Naessens, James M

AU - Khan, Mahmud

AU - Shah, Nilay D

AU - Wagie, Amy

AU - Pautz, Rebecca A.

AU - Campbell, Claudia R.

PY - 2008/10

Y1 - 2008/10

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Explore effects of comorbidity and prior health care utilization on choice of employee health plans with different levels of cost sharing. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Mayo Clinic employees in Rochester, Minnesota (MCR) under age 65 in January 2004; N = 20,379. STUDY DESIGN: Assessment of a natural experiment where self-funded medical care benefit options were changed to contain costs within a large medical group practice. Before the change, most employees were enrolled in a plan with first dollar coverage, while 18% had a plan with copays and deductibles. In 2004, 3 existing plans were replaced by 2 new options, one with lower premiums and higher out-of-pocket costs and the other with higher premiums, a lower coinsurance rate, and lower out-of-pocket maximums. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Data on employees were merged across insurance claims, medical records, eligibility files, and employment files for 2003 and 2004. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:: As the number of chronic comorbidities among family members increased, the probability of choosing high-premium option also increased. Seventy-two percent of employees with at least 1 family member with comorbidity chose the high-cost option versus 54.7% of employees with no comorbidities. High-premium and low-premium plans seem to subdivide population into discrete risk categories, which may adversely affect the future stability of the insurance plan options. CONCLUSIONS: Various factors affect decision making of employees regarding the choice of plan with different levels of cost-sharing. In a natural experiment setting where all options were redesigned, the health status of employees and their dependents played a very significant role in plan choice.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Explore effects of comorbidity and prior health care utilization on choice of employee health plans with different levels of cost sharing. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Mayo Clinic employees in Rochester, Minnesota (MCR) under age 65 in January 2004; N = 20,379. STUDY DESIGN: Assessment of a natural experiment where self-funded medical care benefit options were changed to contain costs within a large medical group practice. Before the change, most employees were enrolled in a plan with first dollar coverage, while 18% had a plan with copays and deductibles. In 2004, 3 existing plans were replaced by 2 new options, one with lower premiums and higher out-of-pocket costs and the other with higher premiums, a lower coinsurance rate, and lower out-of-pocket maximums. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Data on employees were merged across insurance claims, medical records, eligibility files, and employment files for 2003 and 2004. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:: As the number of chronic comorbidities among family members increased, the probability of choosing high-premium option also increased. Seventy-two percent of employees with at least 1 family member with comorbidity chose the high-cost option versus 54.7% of employees with no comorbidities. High-premium and low-premium plans seem to subdivide population into discrete risk categories, which may adversely affect the future stability of the insurance plan options. CONCLUSIONS: Various factors affect decision making of employees regarding the choice of plan with different levels of cost-sharing. In a natural experiment setting where all options were redesigned, the health status of employees and their dependents played a very significant role in plan choice.

KW - Comorbidity

KW - Cost sharing

KW - Health plan options

KW - Selection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=53449092895&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=53449092895&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318185cdac

DO - 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318185cdac

M3 - Article

C2 - 18815524

AN - SCOPUS:53449092895

VL - 46

SP - 1033

EP - 1040

JO - Medical Care

JF - Medical Care

SN - 0025-7079

IS - 10

ER -