Effect of Off-Axis Fluoroscopy Imaging on Two-Dimensional Kinematics in the Lumbar Spine: A Dynamic in Vitro Validation Study

Kristin D Zhao, Ephraim I. Ben-Abraham, Dixon J. Magnuson, Jon J. Camp, Lawrence J. Berglund, Kai Nan An, Gert Bronfort, Ralph Gay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Spine intersegmental motion parameters and the resultant regional patterns may be useful for biomechanical classification of low back pain (LBP) as well as assessing the appropriate intervention strategy. Because of its availability and reasonable cost, two-dimensional (2D) fluoroscopy has great potential as a diagnostic and evaluative tool. However, the technique of quantifying intervertebral motion in the lumbar spine must be validated, and the sensitivity assessed. The purpose of this investigation was to (1) compare synchronous fluoroscopic and optoelectronic measures of intervertebral rotations during dynamic flexion-extension movements in vitro and (2) assess the effect of C-arm rotation to simulate off-axis patient alignment on intervertebral kinematics measures. Six cadaveric lumbar-sacrum specimens were dissected, and active marker optoelectronic sensors were rigidly attached to the bodies of L2-S1. Fluoroscopic sequences and optoelectronic kinematic data (0.15-mm linear, 0.17-0.20 deg rotational, accuracy) were obtained simultaneously. After images were obtained in a true sagittal plane, the image receptor was rotated in 5 deg increments (posterior oblique angulations) from 5 deg to 15 deg. Quantitative motion analysis (qma) software was used to determine the intersegmental rotations from the fluoroscopic images. The mean absolute rotation differences between optoelectronic values and dynamic fluoroscopic values were less than 0.5 deg for all the motion segments at each off-axis fluoroscopic rotation and were not significantly different (P > 0.05) for any of the off-axis rotations of the fluoroscope. Small misalignments of the lumbar spine relative to the fluoroscope did not introduce measurement variation in relative segmental rotations greater than that observed when the spine and fluoroscope were perpendicular to each other, suggesting that fluoroscopic measures of relative segmental rotation during flexion-extension are likely robust, even when patient alignment is not perfect.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number054502
JournalJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
Volume138
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2016

Fingerprint

Validation Studies
Fluoroscopy
Biomechanical Phenomena
Kinematics
Spine
Imaging techniques
Optoelectronic devices
Sacrum
In Vitro Techniques
Low Back Pain
Software
Availability
Costs and Cost Analysis
Sensors

Keywords

  • Fluoroscopy
  • lumbar kinematics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Effect of Off-Axis Fluoroscopy Imaging on Two-Dimensional Kinematics in the Lumbar Spine : A Dynamic in Vitro Validation Study. / Zhao, Kristin D; Ben-Abraham, Ephraim I.; Magnuson, Dixon J.; Camp, Jon J.; Berglund, Lawrence J.; An, Kai Nan; Bronfort, Gert; Gay, Ralph.

In: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, Vol. 138, No. 5, 054502, 01.05.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zhao, Kristin D ; Ben-Abraham, Ephraim I. ; Magnuson, Dixon J. ; Camp, Jon J. ; Berglund, Lawrence J. ; An, Kai Nan ; Bronfort, Gert ; Gay, Ralph. / Effect of Off-Axis Fluoroscopy Imaging on Two-Dimensional Kinematics in the Lumbar Spine : A Dynamic in Vitro Validation Study. In: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 2016 ; Vol. 138, No. 5.
@article{11b43e8174474a22be8c5ba6b345e4f0,
title = "Effect of Off-Axis Fluoroscopy Imaging on Two-Dimensional Kinematics in the Lumbar Spine: A Dynamic in Vitro Validation Study",
abstract = "Spine intersegmental motion parameters and the resultant regional patterns may be useful for biomechanical classification of low back pain (LBP) as well as assessing the appropriate intervention strategy. Because of its availability and reasonable cost, two-dimensional (2D) fluoroscopy has great potential as a diagnostic and evaluative tool. However, the technique of quantifying intervertebral motion in the lumbar spine must be validated, and the sensitivity assessed. The purpose of this investigation was to (1) compare synchronous fluoroscopic and optoelectronic measures of intervertebral rotations during dynamic flexion-extension movements in vitro and (2) assess the effect of C-arm rotation to simulate off-axis patient alignment on intervertebral kinematics measures. Six cadaveric lumbar-sacrum specimens were dissected, and active marker optoelectronic sensors were rigidly attached to the bodies of L2-S1. Fluoroscopic sequences and optoelectronic kinematic data (0.15-mm linear, 0.17-0.20 deg rotational, accuracy) were obtained simultaneously. After images were obtained in a true sagittal plane, the image receptor was rotated in 5 deg increments (posterior oblique angulations) from 5 deg to 15 deg. Quantitative motion analysis (qma) software was used to determine the intersegmental rotations from the fluoroscopic images. The mean absolute rotation differences between optoelectronic values and dynamic fluoroscopic values were less than 0.5 deg for all the motion segments at each off-axis fluoroscopic rotation and were not significantly different (P > 0.05) for any of the off-axis rotations of the fluoroscope. Small misalignments of the lumbar spine relative to the fluoroscope did not introduce measurement variation in relative segmental rotations greater than that observed when the spine and fluoroscope were perpendicular to each other, suggesting that fluoroscopic measures of relative segmental rotation during flexion-extension are likely robust, even when patient alignment is not perfect.",
keywords = "Fluoroscopy, lumbar kinematics",
author = "Zhao, {Kristin D} and Ben-Abraham, {Ephraim I.} and Magnuson, {Dixon J.} and Camp, {Jon J.} and Berglund, {Lawrence J.} and An, {Kai Nan} and Gert Bronfort and Ralph Gay",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1115/1.4032995",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "138",
journal = "Journal of Biomechanical Engineering",
issn = "0148-0731",
publisher = "American Society of Mechanical Engineers(ASME)",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of Off-Axis Fluoroscopy Imaging on Two-Dimensional Kinematics in the Lumbar Spine

T2 - A Dynamic in Vitro Validation Study

AU - Zhao, Kristin D

AU - Ben-Abraham, Ephraim I.

AU - Magnuson, Dixon J.

AU - Camp, Jon J.

AU - Berglund, Lawrence J.

AU - An, Kai Nan

AU - Bronfort, Gert

AU - Gay, Ralph

PY - 2016/5/1

Y1 - 2016/5/1

N2 - Spine intersegmental motion parameters and the resultant regional patterns may be useful for biomechanical classification of low back pain (LBP) as well as assessing the appropriate intervention strategy. Because of its availability and reasonable cost, two-dimensional (2D) fluoroscopy has great potential as a diagnostic and evaluative tool. However, the technique of quantifying intervertebral motion in the lumbar spine must be validated, and the sensitivity assessed. The purpose of this investigation was to (1) compare synchronous fluoroscopic and optoelectronic measures of intervertebral rotations during dynamic flexion-extension movements in vitro and (2) assess the effect of C-arm rotation to simulate off-axis patient alignment on intervertebral kinematics measures. Six cadaveric lumbar-sacrum specimens were dissected, and active marker optoelectronic sensors were rigidly attached to the bodies of L2-S1. Fluoroscopic sequences and optoelectronic kinematic data (0.15-mm linear, 0.17-0.20 deg rotational, accuracy) were obtained simultaneously. After images were obtained in a true sagittal plane, the image receptor was rotated in 5 deg increments (posterior oblique angulations) from 5 deg to 15 deg. Quantitative motion analysis (qma) software was used to determine the intersegmental rotations from the fluoroscopic images. The mean absolute rotation differences between optoelectronic values and dynamic fluoroscopic values were less than 0.5 deg for all the motion segments at each off-axis fluoroscopic rotation and were not significantly different (P > 0.05) for any of the off-axis rotations of the fluoroscope. Small misalignments of the lumbar spine relative to the fluoroscope did not introduce measurement variation in relative segmental rotations greater than that observed when the spine and fluoroscope were perpendicular to each other, suggesting that fluoroscopic measures of relative segmental rotation during flexion-extension are likely robust, even when patient alignment is not perfect.

AB - Spine intersegmental motion parameters and the resultant regional patterns may be useful for biomechanical classification of low back pain (LBP) as well as assessing the appropriate intervention strategy. Because of its availability and reasonable cost, two-dimensional (2D) fluoroscopy has great potential as a diagnostic and evaluative tool. However, the technique of quantifying intervertebral motion in the lumbar spine must be validated, and the sensitivity assessed. The purpose of this investigation was to (1) compare synchronous fluoroscopic and optoelectronic measures of intervertebral rotations during dynamic flexion-extension movements in vitro and (2) assess the effect of C-arm rotation to simulate off-axis patient alignment on intervertebral kinematics measures. Six cadaveric lumbar-sacrum specimens were dissected, and active marker optoelectronic sensors were rigidly attached to the bodies of L2-S1. Fluoroscopic sequences and optoelectronic kinematic data (0.15-mm linear, 0.17-0.20 deg rotational, accuracy) were obtained simultaneously. After images were obtained in a true sagittal plane, the image receptor was rotated in 5 deg increments (posterior oblique angulations) from 5 deg to 15 deg. Quantitative motion analysis (qma) software was used to determine the intersegmental rotations from the fluoroscopic images. The mean absolute rotation differences between optoelectronic values and dynamic fluoroscopic values were less than 0.5 deg for all the motion segments at each off-axis fluoroscopic rotation and were not significantly different (P > 0.05) for any of the off-axis rotations of the fluoroscope. Small misalignments of the lumbar spine relative to the fluoroscope did not introduce measurement variation in relative segmental rotations greater than that observed when the spine and fluoroscope were perpendicular to each other, suggesting that fluoroscopic measures of relative segmental rotation during flexion-extension are likely robust, even when patient alignment is not perfect.

KW - Fluoroscopy

KW - lumbar kinematics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84971291463&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84971291463&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1115/1.4032995

DO - 10.1115/1.4032995

M3 - Article

C2 - 26974192

AN - SCOPUS:84971291463

VL - 138

JO - Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

JF - Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

SN - 0148-0731

IS - 5

M1 - 054502

ER -