Effect of gap size on gliding resistance after flexor tendon repair

Chunfeng D Zhao, Peter C Amadio, Tatsuro Tanaka, Keiji Kutsumi, Tetsu Tsubone, Mark E. Zobitz, Kai Nan An

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Gap formation is a common complication after flexor tendon repair and is associated with adhesion formation, tendon rupture, and decreased strength. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of gap formation on tendon gliding resistance after flexor tendon repair in a human cadaver model. Methods: Twelve index, middle, and ring fingers from four adult human cadaveric hands were used. Gliding resistance versus excursion between the flexor digitorum profundus tendon and the A2 pulley was first measured in intact tendons. After full laceration, each tendon was repaired with the Pennington suture technique and the gliding resistance was measured again. Then, the repaired tendon (a 0-mm gap) was stretched to form a 1-mm gap, and gliding resistance was remeasured. A magnified video image was used to monitor gap size. This process was repeated to evaluate gap sizes of 2, 3, and 4 mm at the repair site. Peak gliding resistance was determined, and the peak gliding resistance was compared among the groups. Results: No significant difference in peak gliding resistance was detected between repaired tendons without a gap and tendons with a 1-mm gap. Repaired tendons with a 2-mm gap could pass through the A2 pulley; however, peak gliding resistance was significantly higher than that for tendons with a 0 or a 1-mm gap (p < 0.05). When the gap reached ≥3 mm, all tendons caught at the A2 pulley edge, causing a dramatically increased peak gliding resistance. Conclusions: The presence of a 2-mm gap after flexor tendon repair significantly increased tendon peak gliding resistance (p < 0.05), while a gap of ≥3 mm further increased peak gliding resistance because of catching at the pulley edge. Clinical Relevance: This study suggests that a large gap (≥3 mm) that develops after repair of the flexor digitorum profundus tendon may increase the risk of triggering (catching) at the pulley edge, which may predispose the tendon to rupture, limitation of motion, or adhesion formation during postoperative rehabilitation. Therefore, we believe that minimizing gap formation is an important consideration in flexor tendon repair.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2482-2488
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A
Volume86
Issue number11
StatePublished - Nov 2004

Fingerprint

Tendons
varespladib methyl
Rupture
Suture Techniques
Lacerations
Cadaver
Fingers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Zhao, C. D., Amadio, P. C., Tanaka, T., Kutsumi, K., Tsubone, T., Zobitz, M. E., & An, K. N. (2004). Effect of gap size on gliding resistance after flexor tendon repair. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A, 86(11), 2482-2488.

Effect of gap size on gliding resistance after flexor tendon repair. / Zhao, Chunfeng D; Amadio, Peter C; Tanaka, Tatsuro; Kutsumi, Keiji; Tsubone, Tetsu; Zobitz, Mark E.; An, Kai Nan.

In: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A, Vol. 86, No. 11, 11.2004, p. 2482-2488.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zhao, CD, Amadio, PC, Tanaka, T, Kutsumi, K, Tsubone, T, Zobitz, ME & An, KN 2004, 'Effect of gap size on gliding resistance after flexor tendon repair', Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A, vol. 86, no. 11, pp. 2482-2488.
Zhao, Chunfeng D ; Amadio, Peter C ; Tanaka, Tatsuro ; Kutsumi, Keiji ; Tsubone, Tetsu ; Zobitz, Mark E. ; An, Kai Nan. / Effect of gap size on gliding resistance after flexor tendon repair. In: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A. 2004 ; Vol. 86, No. 11. pp. 2482-2488.
@article{e1c7201523234539b0b6d7dcc430001a,
title = "Effect of gap size on gliding resistance after flexor tendon repair",
abstract = "Background: Gap formation is a common complication after flexor tendon repair and is associated with adhesion formation, tendon rupture, and decreased strength. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of gap formation on tendon gliding resistance after flexor tendon repair in a human cadaver model. Methods: Twelve index, middle, and ring fingers from four adult human cadaveric hands were used. Gliding resistance versus excursion between the flexor digitorum profundus tendon and the A2 pulley was first measured in intact tendons. After full laceration, each tendon was repaired with the Pennington suture technique and the gliding resistance was measured again. Then, the repaired tendon (a 0-mm gap) was stretched to form a 1-mm gap, and gliding resistance was remeasured. A magnified video image was used to monitor gap size. This process was repeated to evaluate gap sizes of 2, 3, and 4 mm at the repair site. Peak gliding resistance was determined, and the peak gliding resistance was compared among the groups. Results: No significant difference in peak gliding resistance was detected between repaired tendons without a gap and tendons with a 1-mm gap. Repaired tendons with a 2-mm gap could pass through the A2 pulley; however, peak gliding resistance was significantly higher than that for tendons with a 0 or a 1-mm gap (p < 0.05). When the gap reached ≥3 mm, all tendons caught at the A2 pulley edge, causing a dramatically increased peak gliding resistance. Conclusions: The presence of a 2-mm gap after flexor tendon repair significantly increased tendon peak gliding resistance (p < 0.05), while a gap of ≥3 mm further increased peak gliding resistance because of catching at the pulley edge. Clinical Relevance: This study suggests that a large gap (≥3 mm) that develops after repair of the flexor digitorum profundus tendon may increase the risk of triggering (catching) at the pulley edge, which may predispose the tendon to rupture, limitation of motion, or adhesion formation during postoperative rehabilitation. Therefore, we believe that minimizing gap formation is an important consideration in flexor tendon repair.",
author = "Zhao, {Chunfeng D} and Amadio, {Peter C} and Tatsuro Tanaka and Keiji Kutsumi and Tetsu Tsubone and Zobitz, {Mark E.} and An, {Kai Nan}",
year = "2004",
month = "11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "86",
pages = "2482--2488",
journal = "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume",
issn = "0021-9355",
publisher = "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Inc.",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of gap size on gliding resistance after flexor tendon repair

AU - Zhao, Chunfeng D

AU - Amadio, Peter C

AU - Tanaka, Tatsuro

AU - Kutsumi, Keiji

AU - Tsubone, Tetsu

AU - Zobitz, Mark E.

AU - An, Kai Nan

PY - 2004/11

Y1 - 2004/11

N2 - Background: Gap formation is a common complication after flexor tendon repair and is associated with adhesion formation, tendon rupture, and decreased strength. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of gap formation on tendon gliding resistance after flexor tendon repair in a human cadaver model. Methods: Twelve index, middle, and ring fingers from four adult human cadaveric hands were used. Gliding resistance versus excursion between the flexor digitorum profundus tendon and the A2 pulley was first measured in intact tendons. After full laceration, each tendon was repaired with the Pennington suture technique and the gliding resistance was measured again. Then, the repaired tendon (a 0-mm gap) was stretched to form a 1-mm gap, and gliding resistance was remeasured. A magnified video image was used to monitor gap size. This process was repeated to evaluate gap sizes of 2, 3, and 4 mm at the repair site. Peak gliding resistance was determined, and the peak gliding resistance was compared among the groups. Results: No significant difference in peak gliding resistance was detected between repaired tendons without a gap and tendons with a 1-mm gap. Repaired tendons with a 2-mm gap could pass through the A2 pulley; however, peak gliding resistance was significantly higher than that for tendons with a 0 or a 1-mm gap (p < 0.05). When the gap reached ≥3 mm, all tendons caught at the A2 pulley edge, causing a dramatically increased peak gliding resistance. Conclusions: The presence of a 2-mm gap after flexor tendon repair significantly increased tendon peak gliding resistance (p < 0.05), while a gap of ≥3 mm further increased peak gliding resistance because of catching at the pulley edge. Clinical Relevance: This study suggests that a large gap (≥3 mm) that develops after repair of the flexor digitorum profundus tendon may increase the risk of triggering (catching) at the pulley edge, which may predispose the tendon to rupture, limitation of motion, or adhesion formation during postoperative rehabilitation. Therefore, we believe that minimizing gap formation is an important consideration in flexor tendon repair.

AB - Background: Gap formation is a common complication after flexor tendon repair and is associated with adhesion formation, tendon rupture, and decreased strength. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of gap formation on tendon gliding resistance after flexor tendon repair in a human cadaver model. Methods: Twelve index, middle, and ring fingers from four adult human cadaveric hands were used. Gliding resistance versus excursion between the flexor digitorum profundus tendon and the A2 pulley was first measured in intact tendons. After full laceration, each tendon was repaired with the Pennington suture technique and the gliding resistance was measured again. Then, the repaired tendon (a 0-mm gap) was stretched to form a 1-mm gap, and gliding resistance was remeasured. A magnified video image was used to monitor gap size. This process was repeated to evaluate gap sizes of 2, 3, and 4 mm at the repair site. Peak gliding resistance was determined, and the peak gliding resistance was compared among the groups. Results: No significant difference in peak gliding resistance was detected between repaired tendons without a gap and tendons with a 1-mm gap. Repaired tendons with a 2-mm gap could pass through the A2 pulley; however, peak gliding resistance was significantly higher than that for tendons with a 0 or a 1-mm gap (p < 0.05). When the gap reached ≥3 mm, all tendons caught at the A2 pulley edge, causing a dramatically increased peak gliding resistance. Conclusions: The presence of a 2-mm gap after flexor tendon repair significantly increased tendon peak gliding resistance (p < 0.05), while a gap of ≥3 mm further increased peak gliding resistance because of catching at the pulley edge. Clinical Relevance: This study suggests that a large gap (≥3 mm) that develops after repair of the flexor digitorum profundus tendon may increase the risk of triggering (catching) at the pulley edge, which may predispose the tendon to rupture, limitation of motion, or adhesion formation during postoperative rehabilitation. Therefore, we believe that minimizing gap formation is an important consideration in flexor tendon repair.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=8144219527&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=8144219527&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 86

SP - 2482

EP - 2488

JO - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume

JF - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume

SN - 0021-9355

IS - 11

ER -