Effect of emphysema on lung cancer risk in smokers

A computed tomography-based assessment

Yan Li, Stephen J. Swensen, Leman Günbey Karabekmez, Randolph Stuart Marks, Shawn M. Stoddard, Ruoxiang Jiang, Joel B. Worra, Fang Zhang, David Eric Midthun, Mariza De Andrade, Yong Song, Ping Yang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

54 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The contribution of emphysema to lung cancer risk has been recognized, but the effect size needs to be further defined. In this study, 565 primary lung cancer cases were enrolled though a prospective lung cancer cohort at Mayo Clinic, and 450 controls were smokers participating in a lung cancer screening study in the same institution using spiral computed tomography (CT). Cases and controls were frequency matched on age, gender, race, smoking status, and residential region. CT imaging using standard protocol at the time of lung cancer diagnosis (case) or during the study (control) was assessed for emphysema by visual scoring CT analysis as a percentage of lung tissue destroyed. The clinical definition of emphysema was the diagnosis recorded in the medical documentation. Using multiple logistic regression models, emphysema (≥5% on CT) was found to be associated with a 3.8-fold increased lung cancer risk in Caucasians, with higher risk in subgroups of younger (<65 years old, OR = 4.64), heavy smokers (≥40 pack-years, OR = 4.46), and small-cell lung cancer (OR = 5.62). When using >0% or ≥10% emphysema on CT, lung cancer risk was 2.79-fold or 3.33-fold higher than controls. Compared with CT evaluation (using criterion ≥5%), the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and the accuracy of the clinical diagnosis for emphysema in controls were 19%, 98%, 73%, 84%, and 83%, respectively. These results imply that an accurate evaluation of emphysema could help reliably identify individuals at greater risk of lung cancer among smokers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)43-50
Number of pages8
JournalCancer Prevention Research
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2011

Fingerprint

Emphysema
Lung Neoplasms
Tomography
Logistic Models
Spiral Computed Tomography
Early Detection of Cancer
Documentation
Smoking
Sensitivity and Specificity
Lung

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology

Cite this

Effect of emphysema on lung cancer risk in smokers : A computed tomography-based assessment. / Li, Yan; Swensen, Stephen J.; Karabekmez, Leman Günbey; Marks, Randolph Stuart; Stoddard, Shawn M.; Jiang, Ruoxiang; Worra, Joel B.; Zhang, Fang; Midthun, David Eric; De Andrade, Mariza; Song, Yong; Yang, Ping.

In: Cancer Prevention Research, Vol. 4, No. 1, 01.2011, p. 43-50.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Li, Yan ; Swensen, Stephen J. ; Karabekmez, Leman Günbey ; Marks, Randolph Stuart ; Stoddard, Shawn M. ; Jiang, Ruoxiang ; Worra, Joel B. ; Zhang, Fang ; Midthun, David Eric ; De Andrade, Mariza ; Song, Yong ; Yang, Ping. / Effect of emphysema on lung cancer risk in smokers : A computed tomography-based assessment. In: Cancer Prevention Research. 2011 ; Vol. 4, No. 1. pp. 43-50.
@article{707d90cf7b1443c8ae96a5ff456a56ef,
title = "Effect of emphysema on lung cancer risk in smokers: A computed tomography-based assessment",
abstract = "The contribution of emphysema to lung cancer risk has been recognized, but the effect size needs to be further defined. In this study, 565 primary lung cancer cases were enrolled though a prospective lung cancer cohort at Mayo Clinic, and 450 controls were smokers participating in a lung cancer screening study in the same institution using spiral computed tomography (CT). Cases and controls were frequency matched on age, gender, race, smoking status, and residential region. CT imaging using standard protocol at the time of lung cancer diagnosis (case) or during the study (control) was assessed for emphysema by visual scoring CT analysis as a percentage of lung tissue destroyed. The clinical definition of emphysema was the diagnosis recorded in the medical documentation. Using multiple logistic regression models, emphysema (≥5{\%} on CT) was found to be associated with a 3.8-fold increased lung cancer risk in Caucasians, with higher risk in subgroups of younger (<65 years old, OR = 4.64), heavy smokers (≥40 pack-years, OR = 4.46), and small-cell lung cancer (OR = 5.62). When using >0{\%} or ≥10{\%} emphysema on CT, lung cancer risk was 2.79-fold or 3.33-fold higher than controls. Compared with CT evaluation (using criterion ≥5{\%}), the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and the accuracy of the clinical diagnosis for emphysema in controls were 19{\%}, 98{\%}, 73{\%}, 84{\%}, and 83{\%}, respectively. These results imply that an accurate evaluation of emphysema could help reliably identify individuals at greater risk of lung cancer among smokers.",
author = "Yan Li and Swensen, {Stephen J.} and Karabekmez, {Leman G{\"u}nbey} and Marks, {Randolph Stuart} and Stoddard, {Shawn M.} and Ruoxiang Jiang and Worra, {Joel B.} and Fang Zhang and Midthun, {David Eric} and {De Andrade}, Mariza and Yong Song and Ping Yang",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-10-0151",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "43--50",
journal = "Cancer Prevention Research",
issn = "1940-6207",
publisher = "American Association for Cancer Research Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of emphysema on lung cancer risk in smokers

T2 - A computed tomography-based assessment

AU - Li, Yan

AU - Swensen, Stephen J.

AU - Karabekmez, Leman Günbey

AU - Marks, Randolph Stuart

AU - Stoddard, Shawn M.

AU - Jiang, Ruoxiang

AU - Worra, Joel B.

AU - Zhang, Fang

AU - Midthun, David Eric

AU - De Andrade, Mariza

AU - Song, Yong

AU - Yang, Ping

PY - 2011/1

Y1 - 2011/1

N2 - The contribution of emphysema to lung cancer risk has been recognized, but the effect size needs to be further defined. In this study, 565 primary lung cancer cases were enrolled though a prospective lung cancer cohort at Mayo Clinic, and 450 controls were smokers participating in a lung cancer screening study in the same institution using spiral computed tomography (CT). Cases and controls were frequency matched on age, gender, race, smoking status, and residential region. CT imaging using standard protocol at the time of lung cancer diagnosis (case) or during the study (control) was assessed for emphysema by visual scoring CT analysis as a percentage of lung tissue destroyed. The clinical definition of emphysema was the diagnosis recorded in the medical documentation. Using multiple logistic regression models, emphysema (≥5% on CT) was found to be associated with a 3.8-fold increased lung cancer risk in Caucasians, with higher risk in subgroups of younger (<65 years old, OR = 4.64), heavy smokers (≥40 pack-years, OR = 4.46), and small-cell lung cancer (OR = 5.62). When using >0% or ≥10% emphysema on CT, lung cancer risk was 2.79-fold or 3.33-fold higher than controls. Compared with CT evaluation (using criterion ≥5%), the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and the accuracy of the clinical diagnosis for emphysema in controls were 19%, 98%, 73%, 84%, and 83%, respectively. These results imply that an accurate evaluation of emphysema could help reliably identify individuals at greater risk of lung cancer among smokers.

AB - The contribution of emphysema to lung cancer risk has been recognized, but the effect size needs to be further defined. In this study, 565 primary lung cancer cases were enrolled though a prospective lung cancer cohort at Mayo Clinic, and 450 controls were smokers participating in a lung cancer screening study in the same institution using spiral computed tomography (CT). Cases and controls were frequency matched on age, gender, race, smoking status, and residential region. CT imaging using standard protocol at the time of lung cancer diagnosis (case) or during the study (control) was assessed for emphysema by visual scoring CT analysis as a percentage of lung tissue destroyed. The clinical definition of emphysema was the diagnosis recorded in the medical documentation. Using multiple logistic regression models, emphysema (≥5% on CT) was found to be associated with a 3.8-fold increased lung cancer risk in Caucasians, with higher risk in subgroups of younger (<65 years old, OR = 4.64), heavy smokers (≥40 pack-years, OR = 4.46), and small-cell lung cancer (OR = 5.62). When using >0% or ≥10% emphysema on CT, lung cancer risk was 2.79-fold or 3.33-fold higher than controls. Compared with CT evaluation (using criterion ≥5%), the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and the accuracy of the clinical diagnosis for emphysema in controls were 19%, 98%, 73%, 84%, and 83%, respectively. These results imply that an accurate evaluation of emphysema could help reliably identify individuals at greater risk of lung cancer among smokers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650844739&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650844739&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-10-0151

DO - 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-10-0151

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 43

EP - 50

JO - Cancer Prevention Research

JF - Cancer Prevention Research

SN - 1940-6207

IS - 1

ER -