TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of Direct Electrical Current on Bones Infected with Staphylococcus epidermidis
AU - Schmidt-Malan, Suzannah M.
AU - Brinkman, Cassandra L.
AU - Karau, Melissa J.
AU - Brown, Robert A.
AU - Waletzki, Brian E.
AU - Berglund, Lawrence J.
AU - Schuetz, Audrey N.
AU - Greenwood-Quaintance, Kerryl E.
AU - Mandrekar, Jayawant N.
AU - Patel, Robin
N1 - Funding Information:
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases under Award Number R01 AI091594. RP is also supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01 AR056647 and the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases under award number R21 AI125870. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. We would also like to thank the Mayo Clinic Biomaterials and Histomorphometry Core Laboratory for their guidance and critical analysis of the μCT data. Authors’ roles: Study design SMS-M, KEG-Q, and RP. Study conduct: SMS-M, CLB, and MJK. Data collection: SMS-M, RAB, BEW, LJB, and ANS. Data interpretation: SMS-M, JNM, and RP. Drafting manuscript: SMS-M. Revising manuscript content: SMS-M, KEG-Q, MJK, and RP. Approving final version of manuscript: SM, CLB, MJK, KEG-Q, RAB, BEW, LJB, ANS, JNM, and RP. RP takes responsibility for the integrity of the data analysis.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Authors. JBMR Plus Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research
PY - 2019/5
Y1 - 2019/5
N2 - We are developing electrical approaches to treat biofilm-associated orthopedic foreign-body infection. Although we have previously shown that such approaches have antibiofilm activity, the effects on bone have not been assessed. Herein, low-amperage 200 μA fixed direct current (DC) was compared with no current, in a rat femoral foreign-body infection model. In the infected group, a platinum implant seeded with S. epidermidis biofilm (105 CFU/cm2), plus 50 μL of a 109 CFU suspension of bacteria, were placed in the femoral medullary cavity of 71 rats. One week later, rats were assigned to one of four groups: infected with no current or DC, or uninfected with no current or DC. After 2 weeks, bones were removed and subjected to histopathology, micro-computed tomography (μCT), and strength testing. Histopathology showed no inflammation or bony changes/remodeling in the uninfected no current group, and some osteoid formation in the DC group; bones from the infected no current group had evidence of inflammation without bony changes/remodeling; along with inflammation, there was moderate osteoid present in the DC group. μCT showed more cortical bone volume and density, trabecular thickness, and cancellous bone volume in the DC group compared with the no current group, for both uninfected and infected bones (p < 0.05). There was no difference in torsional strength or stiffness between the no current versus DC groups, for both infected and uninfected bones (p > 0.05).
AB - We are developing electrical approaches to treat biofilm-associated orthopedic foreign-body infection. Although we have previously shown that such approaches have antibiofilm activity, the effects on bone have not been assessed. Herein, low-amperage 200 μA fixed direct current (DC) was compared with no current, in a rat femoral foreign-body infection model. In the infected group, a platinum implant seeded with S. epidermidis biofilm (105 CFU/cm2), plus 50 μL of a 109 CFU suspension of bacteria, were placed in the femoral medullary cavity of 71 rats. One week later, rats were assigned to one of four groups: infected with no current or DC, or uninfected with no current or DC. After 2 weeks, bones were removed and subjected to histopathology, micro-computed tomography (μCT), and strength testing. Histopathology showed no inflammation or bony changes/remodeling in the uninfected no current group, and some osteoid formation in the DC group; bones from the infected no current group had evidence of inflammation without bony changes/remodeling; along with inflammation, there was moderate osteoid present in the DC group. μCT showed more cortical bone volume and density, trabecular thickness, and cancellous bone volume in the DC group compared with the no current group, for both uninfected and infected bones (p < 0.05). There was no difference in torsional strength or stiffness between the no current versus DC groups, for both infected and uninfected bones (p > 0.05).
KW - ANTIBIOFILM ACTIVITY
KW - BIOFILM
KW - ELECTRICAL CURRENT
KW - IMPLANT INFECTION
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102484045&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85102484045&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jbm4.10119
DO - 10.1002/jbm4.10119
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85102484045
SN - 2473-4039
VL - 3
JO - JBMR Plus
JF - JBMR Plus
IS - 5
M1 - e10119
ER -