Effect of a multidisciplinary fall risk assessment on falls among neurology inpatients

Andrea N Leep Hunderfund, Cynthia M. Sweeney, Jayawant Mandrekar, LeAnn M. Johnson, Jeffrey W. Britton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether the addition of a physician assessment of patient fall risk at admission would reduce inpatient falls on a tertiary hospital neurology inpatient unit. atients and Methods: A physician fall risk assessment was added to the existing risk assessment process (clinical nurse evaluation and Hendrich II Fall Risk Model score with specific fall prevention measures for patients at risk). An order to select either "Patient is" or "Patient is not at high risk of falls by physician assessment" was added to the physician electronic admission order set. Nurses and physicians were instructed to reach consensus when assessments differed. Full implementation occurred in second-quarter 2008. Preimplementation (January 1, 2006, to March 31, 2008) and postimplementation (April 1, 2008, to December 31, 2009) rates of falls were compared on the neurology inpatient unit and on 6 other medical units that did not receive intervention. Results: The rate of falls during the 7 quarters after full implementation was significantly lower than that during the 9 preceding quarters (4.12 vs 5.69 falls per 1000 patient-days; P=.04), whereas the rate of falls on other medical units did not significantly change (2.99 vs 3.33 falls per 1000 patient-days; P=.24, Poisson test). The consensus risk assessment at admission correctly identified patients at risk for falls (14/325 at-risk patients fell vs 0/147 low-risk patients; P=.01, x2 test), but the Hendrich II Fall Risk Model score, nurse, and physician assessments individually did not. Conclusion: A multidisciplinary approach to fall risk assessment is feasible, correctly identifies patients at risk, and was associated with a reduction in inpatient falls.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)19-24
Number of pages6
JournalMayo Clinic Proceedings
Volume86
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Neurology
Inpatients
Physicians
Nurses
Tertiary Care Centers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Effect of a multidisciplinary fall risk assessment on falls among neurology inpatients. / Hunderfund, Andrea N Leep; Sweeney, Cynthia M.; Mandrekar, Jayawant; Johnson, LeAnn M.; Britton, Jeffrey W.

In: Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Vol. 86, No. 1, 2011, p. 19-24.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hunderfund, Andrea N Leep ; Sweeney, Cynthia M. ; Mandrekar, Jayawant ; Johnson, LeAnn M. ; Britton, Jeffrey W. / Effect of a multidisciplinary fall risk assessment on falls among neurology inpatients. In: Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2011 ; Vol. 86, No. 1. pp. 19-24.
@article{59e6f4ba45c943b0ab3dd587c2b9159e,
title = "Effect of a multidisciplinary fall risk assessment on falls among neurology inpatients",
abstract = "Objective: To evaluate whether the addition of a physician assessment of patient fall risk at admission would reduce inpatient falls on a tertiary hospital neurology inpatient unit. atients and Methods: A physician fall risk assessment was added to the existing risk assessment process (clinical nurse evaluation and Hendrich II Fall Risk Model score with specific fall prevention measures for patients at risk). An order to select either {"}Patient is{"} or {"}Patient is not at high risk of falls by physician assessment{"} was added to the physician electronic admission order set. Nurses and physicians were instructed to reach consensus when assessments differed. Full implementation occurred in second-quarter 2008. Preimplementation (January 1, 2006, to March 31, 2008) and postimplementation (April 1, 2008, to December 31, 2009) rates of falls were compared on the neurology inpatient unit and on 6 other medical units that did not receive intervention. Results: The rate of falls during the 7 quarters after full implementation was significantly lower than that during the 9 preceding quarters (4.12 vs 5.69 falls per 1000 patient-days; P=.04), whereas the rate of falls on other medical units did not significantly change (2.99 vs 3.33 falls per 1000 patient-days; P=.24, Poisson test). The consensus risk assessment at admission correctly identified patients at risk for falls (14/325 at-risk patients fell vs 0/147 low-risk patients; P=.01, x2 test), but the Hendrich II Fall Risk Model score, nurse, and physician assessments individually did not. Conclusion: A multidisciplinary approach to fall risk assessment is feasible, correctly identifies patients at risk, and was associated with a reduction in inpatient falls.",
author = "Hunderfund, {Andrea N Leep} and Sweeney, {Cynthia M.} and Jayawant Mandrekar and Johnson, {LeAnn M.} and Britton, {Jeffrey W.}",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.4065/mcp.2010.0441",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "86",
pages = "19--24",
journal = "Mayo Clinic Proceedings",
issn = "0025-6196",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of a multidisciplinary fall risk assessment on falls among neurology inpatients

AU - Hunderfund, Andrea N Leep

AU - Sweeney, Cynthia M.

AU - Mandrekar, Jayawant

AU - Johnson, LeAnn M.

AU - Britton, Jeffrey W.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Objective: To evaluate whether the addition of a physician assessment of patient fall risk at admission would reduce inpatient falls on a tertiary hospital neurology inpatient unit. atients and Methods: A physician fall risk assessment was added to the existing risk assessment process (clinical nurse evaluation and Hendrich II Fall Risk Model score with specific fall prevention measures for patients at risk). An order to select either "Patient is" or "Patient is not at high risk of falls by physician assessment" was added to the physician electronic admission order set. Nurses and physicians were instructed to reach consensus when assessments differed. Full implementation occurred in second-quarter 2008. Preimplementation (January 1, 2006, to March 31, 2008) and postimplementation (April 1, 2008, to December 31, 2009) rates of falls were compared on the neurology inpatient unit and on 6 other medical units that did not receive intervention. Results: The rate of falls during the 7 quarters after full implementation was significantly lower than that during the 9 preceding quarters (4.12 vs 5.69 falls per 1000 patient-days; P=.04), whereas the rate of falls on other medical units did not significantly change (2.99 vs 3.33 falls per 1000 patient-days; P=.24, Poisson test). The consensus risk assessment at admission correctly identified patients at risk for falls (14/325 at-risk patients fell vs 0/147 low-risk patients; P=.01, x2 test), but the Hendrich II Fall Risk Model score, nurse, and physician assessments individually did not. Conclusion: A multidisciplinary approach to fall risk assessment is feasible, correctly identifies patients at risk, and was associated with a reduction in inpatient falls.

AB - Objective: To evaluate whether the addition of a physician assessment of patient fall risk at admission would reduce inpatient falls on a tertiary hospital neurology inpatient unit. atients and Methods: A physician fall risk assessment was added to the existing risk assessment process (clinical nurse evaluation and Hendrich II Fall Risk Model score with specific fall prevention measures for patients at risk). An order to select either "Patient is" or "Patient is not at high risk of falls by physician assessment" was added to the physician electronic admission order set. Nurses and physicians were instructed to reach consensus when assessments differed. Full implementation occurred in second-quarter 2008. Preimplementation (January 1, 2006, to March 31, 2008) and postimplementation (April 1, 2008, to December 31, 2009) rates of falls were compared on the neurology inpatient unit and on 6 other medical units that did not receive intervention. Results: The rate of falls during the 7 quarters after full implementation was significantly lower than that during the 9 preceding quarters (4.12 vs 5.69 falls per 1000 patient-days; P=.04), whereas the rate of falls on other medical units did not significantly change (2.99 vs 3.33 falls per 1000 patient-days; P=.24, Poisson test). The consensus risk assessment at admission correctly identified patients at risk for falls (14/325 at-risk patients fell vs 0/147 low-risk patients; P=.01, x2 test), but the Hendrich II Fall Risk Model score, nurse, and physician assessments individually did not. Conclusion: A multidisciplinary approach to fall risk assessment is feasible, correctly identifies patients at risk, and was associated with a reduction in inpatient falls.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650973426&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650973426&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4065/mcp.2010.0441

DO - 10.4065/mcp.2010.0441

M3 - Article

C2 - 21193651

AN - SCOPUS:78650973426

VL - 86

SP - 19

EP - 24

JO - Mayo Clinic Proceedings

JF - Mayo Clinic Proceedings

SN - 0025-6196

IS - 1

ER -