TY - JOUR
T1 - Editor's Choice – Risk of Stroke before Revascularisation in Patients with Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis
T2 - A Pooled Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
AU - Carotid Stenosis Trialists’ Collaboration
AU - Fisch, Urs
AU - von Felten, Stefanie
AU - Wiencierz, Andrea
AU - Jansen, Olav
AU - Howard, George
AU - Hendrikse, Jeroen
AU - Halliday, Alison
AU - Fraedrich, Gustav
AU - Eckstein, Hans Henning
AU - Calvet, David
AU - Bulbulia, Richard
AU - Becquemin, Jean Pierre
AU - Algra, Ale
AU - Rothwell, Peter
AU - Ringleb, Peter
AU - Mas, Jean Louis
AU - Brown, Martin M.
AU - Brott, Thomas G.
AU - Bonati, Leo H.
N1 - Funding Information:
The prospective individual patient data meta-analysis by the Carotid Stenosis Trialists’ Collaboration was funded by a grant from The Stroke Association. Dr Bonati was supported by grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation (PBBSB-116873 and 32003B-156658), the Swiss Heart Foundation, the University of Basel, Switzerland, and The Stroke Association. Dr Brown's Chair in Stroke Medicine at University College London is supported by the Reta Lila Weston Trust for Medical Research. Dr Halliday's research is funded by the National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre. Dr Howard is funded by the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Objective: Current guidelines recommending rapid revascularisation of symptomatic carotid stenosis are largely based on data from clinical trials performed at a time when best medical therapy was potentially less effective than today. The risk of stroke and its predictors among patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis awaiting revascularisation in recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and in medical arms of earlier RCTs was assessed. Methods: The pooled data of individual patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis randomised to stenting (CAS) or endarterectomy (CEA) in four recent RCTs, and of patients randomised to medical therapy in three earlier RCTs comparing CEA vs. medical therapy, were compared. The primary outcome event was any stroke occurring between randomisation and treatment by CAS or CEA, or within 120 days after randomisation. Results: A total of 4 754 patients from recent trials and 1 227 from earlier trials were included. In recent trials, patients were randomised a median of 18 (IQR 7, 50) days after the qualifying event (QE). Twenty-three suffered a stroke while waiting for revascularisation (cumulative 120 day risk 1.97%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75 – 3.17). Shorter time from QE until randomisation increased stroke risk after randomisation (χ2 = 6.58, p = .011). Sixty-one patients had a stroke within 120 days of randomisation in the medical arms of earlier trials (cumulative risk 5%, 95% CI 3.8 – 6.2). Stroke risk was lower in recent than earlier trials when adjusted for time between QE and randomisation, age, severity of QE, and degree of carotid stenosis (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.25 – 0.88, p = .019). Conclusion: Patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis enrolled in recent large RCTs had a lower risk of stroke after randomisation than historical controls. The added benefit of carotid revascularisation to modern medical care needs to be revisited in future studies. Until then, adhering to current recommendations for early revascularisation of patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis considered to require invasive treatment is advisable.
AB - Objective: Current guidelines recommending rapid revascularisation of symptomatic carotid stenosis are largely based on data from clinical trials performed at a time when best medical therapy was potentially less effective than today. The risk of stroke and its predictors among patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis awaiting revascularisation in recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and in medical arms of earlier RCTs was assessed. Methods: The pooled data of individual patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis randomised to stenting (CAS) or endarterectomy (CEA) in four recent RCTs, and of patients randomised to medical therapy in three earlier RCTs comparing CEA vs. medical therapy, were compared. The primary outcome event was any stroke occurring between randomisation and treatment by CAS or CEA, or within 120 days after randomisation. Results: A total of 4 754 patients from recent trials and 1 227 from earlier trials were included. In recent trials, patients were randomised a median of 18 (IQR 7, 50) days after the qualifying event (QE). Twenty-three suffered a stroke while waiting for revascularisation (cumulative 120 day risk 1.97%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75 – 3.17). Shorter time from QE until randomisation increased stroke risk after randomisation (χ2 = 6.58, p = .011). Sixty-one patients had a stroke within 120 days of randomisation in the medical arms of earlier trials (cumulative risk 5%, 95% CI 3.8 – 6.2). Stroke risk was lower in recent than earlier trials when adjusted for time between QE and randomisation, age, severity of QE, and degree of carotid stenosis (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.25 – 0.88, p = .019). Conclusion: Patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis enrolled in recent large RCTs had a lower risk of stroke after randomisation than historical controls. The added benefit of carotid revascularisation to modern medical care needs to be revisited in future studies. Until then, adhering to current recommendations for early revascularisation of patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis considered to require invasive treatment is advisable.
KW - Endarterectomy
KW - Ischaemic stroke
KW - Medical treatment
KW - Revascularisation
KW - Stenosis
KW - Stent
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103716537&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85103716537&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.02.024
DO - 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.02.024
M3 - Article
C2 - 33827781
AN - SCOPUS:85103716537
SN - 1078-5884
VL - 61
SP - 881
EP - 887
JO - European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
JF - European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
IS - 6
ER -