TY - JOUR
T1 - Editorial Commentary
T2 - What Is the Best Graft Source for Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?
AU - Martin, Richard Kyle
AU - Levy, Bruce A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Arthroscopy Association of North America
PY - 2019/1
Y1 - 2019/1
N2 - In 2018, the best available evidence has failed to show any significant clinical or functional difference between autograft and allograft for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Autograft patients may have higher complication rates. Both groups show good functional outcome after reconstruction.
AB - In 2018, the best available evidence has failed to show any significant clinical or functional difference between autograft and allograft for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Autograft patients may have higher complication rates. Both groups show good functional outcome after reconstruction.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058178398&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058178398&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.08.043
DO - 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.08.043
M3 - Editorial
C2 - 30611358
AN - SCOPUS:85058178398
SN - 0749-8063
VL - 35
SP - 275
EP - 276
JO - Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
JF - Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
IS - 1
ER -