TY - JOUR
T1 - Editorial Commentary
T2 - Autograft Beats Allograft for Most Knee Ligament Surgery
AU - Therrien, Erik
AU - Stuart, Michael J.
AU - Levy, Bruce A.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors report the following potential conflicts of interest or sources of funding: M.J.S. reports other, American Journal of Sports Medicine, grants and personal fees, Arthrex; grants, Stryker. B.A.L. reports personal fees, Arthrex, Linvatec, COVR Medical; grants and research support, Biomet; editorial or governing board, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Journal of Knee Surgery, Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, Orthopedics Today; paid consultant and research support, Smith & Nephew; research support, Stryker. Full ICMJE author disclosure forms are available for this article online, as supplementary material.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Arthroscopy Association of North America
PY - 2021/3
Y1 - 2021/3
N2 - Knee ligament reconstruction can be performed with autograft or allograft. The use of an autograft has been shown to improve outcomes in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction for young, active patients, and also in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. A systematic review of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction showed no difference in outcomes between autograft and allograft tissue. There is a paucity of data comparing autograft versus allograft for fibular collateral ligament and posterolateral corner reconstructions, alone or combined with other ligament surgery. Allograft advantages include no donor site morbidity and reduced operative time. Disadvantages include increased cost and higher failure rates in younger patients. Autograft tissue should be considered in younger, active patients whenever possible.
AB - Knee ligament reconstruction can be performed with autograft or allograft. The use of an autograft has been shown to improve outcomes in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction for young, active patients, and also in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. A systematic review of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction showed no difference in outcomes between autograft and allograft tissue. There is a paucity of data comparing autograft versus allograft for fibular collateral ligament and posterolateral corner reconstructions, alone or combined with other ligament surgery. Allograft advantages include no donor site morbidity and reduced operative time. Disadvantages include increased cost and higher failure rates in younger patients. Autograft tissue should be considered in younger, active patients whenever possible.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101568304&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85101568304&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.12.181
DO - 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.12.181
M3 - Editorial
C2 - 33673973
AN - SCOPUS:85101568304
SN - 0749-8063
VL - 37
SP - 951
EP - 952
JO - Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
JF - Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
IS - 3
ER -