Echocardiographic determinants of peak aerobic capacity and breathing efficiency in patients with undifferentiated dyspnea

Jeremy J. Thaden, Robert B. McCully, Stephen L. Kopecky, Thomas G. Allison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Diastolic function and E/e′ correlate with peak aerobic capacity (VO2) in patients with heart failure, but the echocardiographic correlates of abnormal gas exchange in patients without heart failure are not well defined. We sought to determine the echocardiographic correlates of peak VO2 and breathing efficiency (estimated using the ratio of minute ventilation to carbon dioxide production, or VE/VCO2 nadir) in patients with unexplained dyspnea. We identified 232 patients with unexplained dyspnea who underwent echocardiography at rest followed by stress echocardiography with simultaneous measurement of peak VO2 and VE/VCO2 nadir. At baseline, 17 patients (5%) had an E/e′ of ≥15 while 31 patients (17%) had a right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) of >35 mm Hg. E/e′ ≥15 and RVSP >35 mm Hg were associated with lower peak VO2 (14.1 ± 4.4 vs 21.0 ± 6.9 and 15.2 ± 3.6 vs 21.8 ± 6.8 ml/kg/min, respectively, p <0.0001). E/e′ ≥15 (sensitivity 0.13, specificity 0.99, area under the curve 0.64) and RVSP >35 mm Hg (sensitivity 0.38, specificity 0.93, area under the curve 0.76) were highly specific for predicting limited peak VO2. Age and RVSP at rest were independent correlates with VE/VCO2, but diastolic function was not. However, the risk of having abnormal VE/VCO 2 nadir was only elevated in subjects with elevated RVSP in the setting of abnormal diastolic function (hazard ratio 2.4, 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 4.6, p = 0.02). In conclusion, both E/e′ ≥15 and RVSP >35 mm Hg are highly specific markers of exercise limitation in patients without heart failure, but RVSP at rest may offer better overall diagnostic power than E/e′ to predict low peak VO2 in this group.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)473-478
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Cardiology
Volume114
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2014

Fingerprint

Dyspnea
Ventricular Pressure
Respiration
Blood Pressure
Heart Failure
Stress Echocardiography
Carbon Dioxide
Area Under Curve
Ventilation
Echocardiography
Gases
Confidence Intervals
Exercise
Sensitivity and Specificity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Echocardiographic determinants of peak aerobic capacity and breathing efficiency in patients with undifferentiated dyspnea. / Thaden, Jeremy J.; McCully, Robert B.; Kopecky, Stephen L.; Allison, Thomas G.

In: American Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 114, No. 3, 01.08.2014, p. 473-478.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Thaden, Jeremy J. ; McCully, Robert B. ; Kopecky, Stephen L. ; Allison, Thomas G. / Echocardiographic determinants of peak aerobic capacity and breathing efficiency in patients with undifferentiated dyspnea. In: American Journal of Cardiology. 2014 ; Vol. 114, No. 3. pp. 473-478.
@article{ac6635b23c174738af900440f5a04956,
title = "Echocardiographic determinants of peak aerobic capacity and breathing efficiency in patients with undifferentiated dyspnea",
abstract = "Diastolic function and E/e′ correlate with peak aerobic capacity (VO2) in patients with heart failure, but the echocardiographic correlates of abnormal gas exchange in patients without heart failure are not well defined. We sought to determine the echocardiographic correlates of peak VO2 and breathing efficiency (estimated using the ratio of minute ventilation to carbon dioxide production, or VE/VCO2 nadir) in patients with unexplained dyspnea. We identified 232 patients with unexplained dyspnea who underwent echocardiography at rest followed by stress echocardiography with simultaneous measurement of peak VO2 and VE/VCO2 nadir. At baseline, 17 patients (5{\%}) had an E/e′ of ≥15 while 31 patients (17{\%}) had a right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) of >35 mm Hg. E/e′ ≥15 and RVSP >35 mm Hg were associated with lower peak VO2 (14.1 ± 4.4 vs 21.0 ± 6.9 and 15.2 ± 3.6 vs 21.8 ± 6.8 ml/kg/min, respectively, p <0.0001). E/e′ ≥15 (sensitivity 0.13, specificity 0.99, area under the curve 0.64) and RVSP >35 mm Hg (sensitivity 0.38, specificity 0.93, area under the curve 0.76) were highly specific for predicting limited peak VO2. Age and RVSP at rest were independent correlates with VE/VCO2, but diastolic function was not. However, the risk of having abnormal VE/VCO 2 nadir was only elevated in subjects with elevated RVSP in the setting of abnormal diastolic function (hazard ratio 2.4, 95{\%} confidence interval 1.3 to 4.6, p = 0.02). In conclusion, both E/e′ ≥15 and RVSP >35 mm Hg are highly specific markers of exercise limitation in patients without heart failure, but RVSP at rest may offer better overall diagnostic power than E/e′ to predict low peak VO2 in this group.",
author = "Thaden, {Jeremy J.} and McCully, {Robert B.} and Kopecky, {Stephen L.} and Allison, {Thomas G.}",
year = "2014",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.04.054",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "114",
pages = "473--478",
journal = "American Journal of Cardiology",
issn = "0002-9149",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Echocardiographic determinants of peak aerobic capacity and breathing efficiency in patients with undifferentiated dyspnea

AU - Thaden, Jeremy J.

AU - McCully, Robert B.

AU - Kopecky, Stephen L.

AU - Allison, Thomas G.

PY - 2014/8/1

Y1 - 2014/8/1

N2 - Diastolic function and E/e′ correlate with peak aerobic capacity (VO2) in patients with heart failure, but the echocardiographic correlates of abnormal gas exchange in patients without heart failure are not well defined. We sought to determine the echocardiographic correlates of peak VO2 and breathing efficiency (estimated using the ratio of minute ventilation to carbon dioxide production, or VE/VCO2 nadir) in patients with unexplained dyspnea. We identified 232 patients with unexplained dyspnea who underwent echocardiography at rest followed by stress echocardiography with simultaneous measurement of peak VO2 and VE/VCO2 nadir. At baseline, 17 patients (5%) had an E/e′ of ≥15 while 31 patients (17%) had a right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) of >35 mm Hg. E/e′ ≥15 and RVSP >35 mm Hg were associated with lower peak VO2 (14.1 ± 4.4 vs 21.0 ± 6.9 and 15.2 ± 3.6 vs 21.8 ± 6.8 ml/kg/min, respectively, p <0.0001). E/e′ ≥15 (sensitivity 0.13, specificity 0.99, area under the curve 0.64) and RVSP >35 mm Hg (sensitivity 0.38, specificity 0.93, area under the curve 0.76) were highly specific for predicting limited peak VO2. Age and RVSP at rest were independent correlates with VE/VCO2, but diastolic function was not. However, the risk of having abnormal VE/VCO 2 nadir was only elevated in subjects with elevated RVSP in the setting of abnormal diastolic function (hazard ratio 2.4, 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 4.6, p = 0.02). In conclusion, both E/e′ ≥15 and RVSP >35 mm Hg are highly specific markers of exercise limitation in patients without heart failure, but RVSP at rest may offer better overall diagnostic power than E/e′ to predict low peak VO2 in this group.

AB - Diastolic function and E/e′ correlate with peak aerobic capacity (VO2) in patients with heart failure, but the echocardiographic correlates of abnormal gas exchange in patients without heart failure are not well defined. We sought to determine the echocardiographic correlates of peak VO2 and breathing efficiency (estimated using the ratio of minute ventilation to carbon dioxide production, or VE/VCO2 nadir) in patients with unexplained dyspnea. We identified 232 patients with unexplained dyspnea who underwent echocardiography at rest followed by stress echocardiography with simultaneous measurement of peak VO2 and VE/VCO2 nadir. At baseline, 17 patients (5%) had an E/e′ of ≥15 while 31 patients (17%) had a right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) of >35 mm Hg. E/e′ ≥15 and RVSP >35 mm Hg were associated with lower peak VO2 (14.1 ± 4.4 vs 21.0 ± 6.9 and 15.2 ± 3.6 vs 21.8 ± 6.8 ml/kg/min, respectively, p <0.0001). E/e′ ≥15 (sensitivity 0.13, specificity 0.99, area under the curve 0.64) and RVSP >35 mm Hg (sensitivity 0.38, specificity 0.93, area under the curve 0.76) were highly specific for predicting limited peak VO2. Age and RVSP at rest were independent correlates with VE/VCO2, but diastolic function was not. However, the risk of having abnormal VE/VCO 2 nadir was only elevated in subjects with elevated RVSP in the setting of abnormal diastolic function (hazard ratio 2.4, 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 4.6, p = 0.02). In conclusion, both E/e′ ≥15 and RVSP >35 mm Hg are highly specific markers of exercise limitation in patients without heart failure, but RVSP at rest may offer better overall diagnostic power than E/e′ to predict low peak VO2 in this group.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904255867&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904255867&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.04.054

DO - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.04.054

M3 - Article

C2 - 24948490

AN - SCOPUS:84904255867

VL - 114

SP - 473

EP - 478

JO - American Journal of Cardiology

JF - American Journal of Cardiology

SN - 0002-9149

IS - 3

ER -