Early results from a novel quality outcomes program: The American Society of Breast Surgeons' mastery of breast surgery

Edward J. Clifford, Edward B. De Vol, Barbara A Pockaj, Lee G. Wilke, Judy C Boughey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: In 2008, the American Society for Breast Surgeons launched its Mastery in Breast Surgery Pilot Program to demonstrate feasibility of a Web-based tool for breast surgeons to document and monitor quality outcomes. Methods: Participating surgeons report performance of three quality measures for breast procedures: Was a needle biopsy performed to evaluate the breast lesion before the procedure? Was the surgical specimen oriented? For nonpalpable lesions localized with image guidance, was there intraoperative confirmation of removal? Data are collected through the American Society for Breast Surgeons' Web-based software using a secure server and encrypted identification numbers. Surgeon demographic/practice characteristic data were collected, and logistic regression models were used to identify factors that affected quality measures. Results: From October 2008 to December 2009, a total of 696 surgeons entered data for 28,798 breast procedures. Participants were diverse in years in practice, geographic location, practice setting and type, and proportion of practice made up of breast procedures. Delivery of "optimal care" (defined as delivery of all quality measures for which there was no valid clinical reason for nonperformance) was high for all surgeon demographic/practice characteristics, ranging from 81% to 94%. Statistically significant differences in delivery of quality measures were observed within all physician demographic/practice characteristic variables, but many absolute differences were small. Conclusions: The high level of participation and volume of breast procedures for which quality measure data was entered demonstrate this is a feasible means of collecting quality performance data. Future development will include identifying/developing additional quality measures and establishing evidence-based benchmarks for care on the basis of data collected.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAnnals of Surgical Oncology
Volume17
Issue numberSUPPL. 3
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2010

Fingerprint

Breast
Demography
Logistic Models
Benchmarking
Geographic Locations
Needle Biopsy
Surgeons
Software
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Oncology

Cite this

Early results from a novel quality outcomes program : The American Society of Breast Surgeons' mastery of breast surgery. / Clifford, Edward J.; De Vol, Edward B.; Pockaj, Barbara A; Wilke, Lee G.; Boughey, Judy C.

In: Annals of Surgical Oncology, Vol. 17, No. SUPPL. 3, 10.2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0077a021709a4da0831bb6fe211cc865,
title = "Early results from a novel quality outcomes program: The American Society of Breast Surgeons' mastery of breast surgery",
abstract = "Background: In 2008, the American Society for Breast Surgeons launched its Mastery in Breast Surgery Pilot Program to demonstrate feasibility of a Web-based tool for breast surgeons to document and monitor quality outcomes. Methods: Participating surgeons report performance of three quality measures for breast procedures: Was a needle biopsy performed to evaluate the breast lesion before the procedure? Was the surgical specimen oriented? For nonpalpable lesions localized with image guidance, was there intraoperative confirmation of removal? Data are collected through the American Society for Breast Surgeons' Web-based software using a secure server and encrypted identification numbers. Surgeon demographic/practice characteristic data were collected, and logistic regression models were used to identify factors that affected quality measures. Results: From October 2008 to December 2009, a total of 696 surgeons entered data for 28,798 breast procedures. Participants were diverse in years in practice, geographic location, practice setting and type, and proportion of practice made up of breast procedures. Delivery of {"}optimal care{"} (defined as delivery of all quality measures for which there was no valid clinical reason for nonperformance) was high for all surgeon demographic/practice characteristics, ranging from 81{\%} to 94{\%}. Statistically significant differences in delivery of quality measures were observed within all physician demographic/practice characteristic variables, but many absolute differences were small. Conclusions: The high level of participation and volume of breast procedures for which quality measure data was entered demonstrate this is a feasible means of collecting quality performance data. Future development will include identifying/developing additional quality measures and establishing evidence-based benchmarks for care on the basis of data collected.",
author = "Clifford, {Edward J.} and {De Vol}, {Edward B.} and Pockaj, {Barbara A} and Wilke, {Lee G.} and Boughey, {Judy C}",
year = "2010",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1245/s10434-010-1263-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
journal = "Annals of Surgical Oncology",
issn = "1068-9265",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "SUPPL. 3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Early results from a novel quality outcomes program

T2 - The American Society of Breast Surgeons' mastery of breast surgery

AU - Clifford, Edward J.

AU - De Vol, Edward B.

AU - Pockaj, Barbara A

AU - Wilke, Lee G.

AU - Boughey, Judy C

PY - 2010/10

Y1 - 2010/10

N2 - Background: In 2008, the American Society for Breast Surgeons launched its Mastery in Breast Surgery Pilot Program to demonstrate feasibility of a Web-based tool for breast surgeons to document and monitor quality outcomes. Methods: Participating surgeons report performance of three quality measures for breast procedures: Was a needle biopsy performed to evaluate the breast lesion before the procedure? Was the surgical specimen oriented? For nonpalpable lesions localized with image guidance, was there intraoperative confirmation of removal? Data are collected through the American Society for Breast Surgeons' Web-based software using a secure server and encrypted identification numbers. Surgeon demographic/practice characteristic data were collected, and logistic regression models were used to identify factors that affected quality measures. Results: From October 2008 to December 2009, a total of 696 surgeons entered data for 28,798 breast procedures. Participants were diverse in years in practice, geographic location, practice setting and type, and proportion of practice made up of breast procedures. Delivery of "optimal care" (defined as delivery of all quality measures for which there was no valid clinical reason for nonperformance) was high for all surgeon demographic/practice characteristics, ranging from 81% to 94%. Statistically significant differences in delivery of quality measures were observed within all physician demographic/practice characteristic variables, but many absolute differences were small. Conclusions: The high level of participation and volume of breast procedures for which quality measure data was entered demonstrate this is a feasible means of collecting quality performance data. Future development will include identifying/developing additional quality measures and establishing evidence-based benchmarks for care on the basis of data collected.

AB - Background: In 2008, the American Society for Breast Surgeons launched its Mastery in Breast Surgery Pilot Program to demonstrate feasibility of a Web-based tool for breast surgeons to document and monitor quality outcomes. Methods: Participating surgeons report performance of three quality measures for breast procedures: Was a needle biopsy performed to evaluate the breast lesion before the procedure? Was the surgical specimen oriented? For nonpalpable lesions localized with image guidance, was there intraoperative confirmation of removal? Data are collected through the American Society for Breast Surgeons' Web-based software using a secure server and encrypted identification numbers. Surgeon demographic/practice characteristic data were collected, and logistic regression models were used to identify factors that affected quality measures. Results: From October 2008 to December 2009, a total of 696 surgeons entered data for 28,798 breast procedures. Participants were diverse in years in practice, geographic location, practice setting and type, and proportion of practice made up of breast procedures. Delivery of "optimal care" (defined as delivery of all quality measures for which there was no valid clinical reason for nonperformance) was high for all surgeon demographic/practice characteristics, ranging from 81% to 94%. Statistically significant differences in delivery of quality measures were observed within all physician demographic/practice characteristic variables, but many absolute differences were small. Conclusions: The high level of participation and volume of breast procedures for which quality measure data was entered demonstrate this is a feasible means of collecting quality performance data. Future development will include identifying/developing additional quality measures and establishing evidence-based benchmarks for care on the basis of data collected.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78149250423&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78149250423&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1245/s10434-010-1263-1

DO - 10.1245/s10434-010-1263-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 20853039

AN - SCOPUS:78149250423

VL - 17

JO - Annals of Surgical Oncology

JF - Annals of Surgical Oncology

SN - 1068-9265

IS - SUPPL. 3

ER -