Early phase trial designs and endpoints for targeted therapies in rare genotype subsets

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The primary goal of phase I dose-finding trials has been historically to understand the safety profile of a new treatment/regimen and establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for further investigation in a specific tumor type. These designs hinged on the assumption that the highest safe dose is also likely to be the most efficacious dose. In the current era of stratified medicine and targeted therapies, these assumptions and designs are quickly becoming obsolete. Newer approaches to dose-finding designs are emerging with a focus on not just safety, but also an efficacy (clinical- or biomarker-based) measure to guide the determination of the "optimal" dose (not necessarily the MTD) model, as opposed to rule-based designs. These designs allow for flexibility in trial conduct, with improved precision in estimating the dose to take forward for further testing, patient selection/enrichment strategies to maximize the chance of therapeutic effect, and expansion cohorts to further understand the safety/efficacy of the agent and patient subsets most likely to benefit from the agent under investigation. Although advances in technology have enabled the possibility of using these newer approaches, the acceptance and integration of these approaches in practice can only be accelerated if it is developed in concert with a clinical paradigm.

Fingerprint

Maximum Tolerated Dose
Genotype
Safety
Proxy
Therapeutic Uses
Patient Selection
Therapeutics
Biomarkers
Medicine
Technology
Neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{bc2e1aa9c75349f19475a8652a193f4a,
title = "Early phase trial designs and endpoints for targeted therapies in rare genotype subsets",
abstract = "The primary goal of phase I dose-finding trials has been historically to understand the safety profile of a new treatment/regimen and establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for further investigation in a specific tumor type. These designs hinged on the assumption that the highest safe dose is also likely to be the most efficacious dose. In the current era of stratified medicine and targeted therapies, these assumptions and designs are quickly becoming obsolete. Newer approaches to dose-finding designs are emerging with a focus on not just safety, but also an efficacy (clinical- or biomarker-based) measure to guide the determination of the {"}optimal{"} dose (not necessarily the MTD) model, as opposed to rule-based designs. These designs allow for flexibility in trial conduct, with improved precision in estimating the dose to take forward for further testing, patient selection/enrichment strategies to maximize the chance of therapeutic effect, and expansion cohorts to further understand the safety/efficacy of the agent and patient subsets most likely to benefit from the agent under investigation. Although advances in technology have enabled the possibility of using these newer approaches, the acceptance and integration of these approaches in practice can only be accelerated if it is developed in concert with a clinical paradigm.",
author = "Mandrekar, {Sumithra J}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.14694/EdBook_AM.2014.34.e107",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "e107--e110",
journal = "American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book / ASCO. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Meeting",
issn = "1548-8756",
publisher = "American Society of Clinical Oncology",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Early phase trial designs and endpoints for targeted therapies in rare genotype subsets

AU - Mandrekar, Sumithra J

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The primary goal of phase I dose-finding trials has been historically to understand the safety profile of a new treatment/regimen and establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for further investigation in a specific tumor type. These designs hinged on the assumption that the highest safe dose is also likely to be the most efficacious dose. In the current era of stratified medicine and targeted therapies, these assumptions and designs are quickly becoming obsolete. Newer approaches to dose-finding designs are emerging with a focus on not just safety, but also an efficacy (clinical- or biomarker-based) measure to guide the determination of the "optimal" dose (not necessarily the MTD) model, as opposed to rule-based designs. These designs allow for flexibility in trial conduct, with improved precision in estimating the dose to take forward for further testing, patient selection/enrichment strategies to maximize the chance of therapeutic effect, and expansion cohorts to further understand the safety/efficacy of the agent and patient subsets most likely to benefit from the agent under investigation. Although advances in technology have enabled the possibility of using these newer approaches, the acceptance and integration of these approaches in practice can only be accelerated if it is developed in concert with a clinical paradigm.

AB - The primary goal of phase I dose-finding trials has been historically to understand the safety profile of a new treatment/regimen and establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for further investigation in a specific tumor type. These designs hinged on the assumption that the highest safe dose is also likely to be the most efficacious dose. In the current era of stratified medicine and targeted therapies, these assumptions and designs are quickly becoming obsolete. Newer approaches to dose-finding designs are emerging with a focus on not just safety, but also an efficacy (clinical- or biomarker-based) measure to guide the determination of the "optimal" dose (not necessarily the MTD) model, as opposed to rule-based designs. These designs allow for flexibility in trial conduct, with improved precision in estimating the dose to take forward for further testing, patient selection/enrichment strategies to maximize the chance of therapeutic effect, and expansion cohorts to further understand the safety/efficacy of the agent and patient subsets most likely to benefit from the agent under investigation. Although advances in technology have enabled the possibility of using these newer approaches, the acceptance and integration of these approaches in practice can only be accelerated if it is developed in concert with a clinical paradigm.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953342408&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953342408&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.14694/EdBook_AM.2014.34.e107

DO - 10.14694/EdBook_AM.2014.34.e107

M3 - Article

SP - e107-e110

JO - American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book / ASCO. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Meeting

JF - American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book / ASCO. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Meeting

SN - 1548-8756

ER -