Dynamic incremental CT

Effect of volume and concentration of contrast material and patient weight on hepatic enhancement

Jay Heiken, James A. Brink, Bruce L. McClennan, Stuart S. Sagel, Tamara M. Crowe, Mary V. Gaines

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

230 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop an individualized approach to the intravenous administration of contrast material for hepatic computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred patients were randomized into eight protocols. Each group received different volumes and concentrations of contrast material. For each protocol, maximum hepatic enhancement (MHE) was calculated, with an adjustment for iodine dose and patient weight. The contrast enhancement index (CEI) and optimum scanning interval were calculated for hepatic enhancement thresholds of 10-60 HU. RESULTS: The MHE calculated as a function of patient weight was 96 HU ± 19 per gram of iodine per kilogram of body weight. CEIs obtained with a contrast material concentration of 240 mg of iodine per milliliter were inferior to those obtained with a concentration of 320 or 350 mg I/mL. At low enhancement thresholds, the volume of contrast material had a more important effect than the concentration on CEI and optimum scanning interval; at high thresholds, concentration had a more important effect. CONCLUSION: For a patient of known weight, one can calculate the iodine dose needed to provide a desired level of hepatic enhancement. Use of a contrast material with a concentration of 240 mg I/mL is not recommended for dynamic incremental hepatic CT, except in small patients (eg, those weighing less than 73 kg).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)353-357
Number of pages5
JournalRadiology
Volume195
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Contrast Media
Weights and Measures
Iodine
Liver
Tomography
Intravenous Administration
Body Weight

Keywords

  • Computed tomography (CT), contrast media
  • Liver neoplasms
  • Liver, CT

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Dynamic incremental CT : Effect of volume and concentration of contrast material and patient weight on hepatic enhancement. / Heiken, Jay; Brink, James A.; McClennan, Bruce L.; Sagel, Stuart S.; Crowe, Tamara M.; Gaines, Mary V.

In: Radiology, Vol. 195, No. 2, 01.01.1995, p. 353-357.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Heiken, Jay ; Brink, James A. ; McClennan, Bruce L. ; Sagel, Stuart S. ; Crowe, Tamara M. ; Gaines, Mary V. / Dynamic incremental CT : Effect of volume and concentration of contrast material and patient weight on hepatic enhancement. In: Radiology. 1995 ; Vol. 195, No. 2. pp. 353-357.
@article{c52b4dafeffa4792b4e3974dcf25fdda,
title = "Dynamic incremental CT: Effect of volume and concentration of contrast material and patient weight on hepatic enhancement",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To develop an individualized approach to the intravenous administration of contrast material for hepatic computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred patients were randomized into eight protocols. Each group received different volumes and concentrations of contrast material. For each protocol, maximum hepatic enhancement (MHE) was calculated, with an adjustment for iodine dose and patient weight. The contrast enhancement index (CEI) and optimum scanning interval were calculated for hepatic enhancement thresholds of 10-60 HU. RESULTS: The MHE calculated as a function of patient weight was 96 HU ± 19 per gram of iodine per kilogram of body weight. CEIs obtained with a contrast material concentration of 240 mg of iodine per milliliter were inferior to those obtained with a concentration of 320 or 350 mg I/mL. At low enhancement thresholds, the volume of contrast material had a more important effect than the concentration on CEI and optimum scanning interval; at high thresholds, concentration had a more important effect. CONCLUSION: For a patient of known weight, one can calculate the iodine dose needed to provide a desired level of hepatic enhancement. Use of a contrast material with a concentration of 240 mg I/mL is not recommended for dynamic incremental hepatic CT, except in small patients (eg, those weighing less than 73 kg).",
keywords = "Computed tomography (CT), contrast media, Liver neoplasms, Liver, CT",
author = "Jay Heiken and Brink, {James A.} and McClennan, {Bruce L.} and Sagel, {Stuart S.} and Crowe, {Tamara M.} and Gaines, {Mary V.}",
year = "1995",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1148/radiology.195.2.7724752",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "195",
pages = "353--357",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dynamic incremental CT

T2 - Effect of volume and concentration of contrast material and patient weight on hepatic enhancement

AU - Heiken, Jay

AU - Brink, James A.

AU - McClennan, Bruce L.

AU - Sagel, Stuart S.

AU - Crowe, Tamara M.

AU - Gaines, Mary V.

PY - 1995/1/1

Y1 - 1995/1/1

N2 - PURPOSE: To develop an individualized approach to the intravenous administration of contrast material for hepatic computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred patients were randomized into eight protocols. Each group received different volumes and concentrations of contrast material. For each protocol, maximum hepatic enhancement (MHE) was calculated, with an adjustment for iodine dose and patient weight. The contrast enhancement index (CEI) and optimum scanning interval were calculated for hepatic enhancement thresholds of 10-60 HU. RESULTS: The MHE calculated as a function of patient weight was 96 HU ± 19 per gram of iodine per kilogram of body weight. CEIs obtained with a contrast material concentration of 240 mg of iodine per milliliter were inferior to those obtained with a concentration of 320 or 350 mg I/mL. At low enhancement thresholds, the volume of contrast material had a more important effect than the concentration on CEI and optimum scanning interval; at high thresholds, concentration had a more important effect. CONCLUSION: For a patient of known weight, one can calculate the iodine dose needed to provide a desired level of hepatic enhancement. Use of a contrast material with a concentration of 240 mg I/mL is not recommended for dynamic incremental hepatic CT, except in small patients (eg, those weighing less than 73 kg).

AB - PURPOSE: To develop an individualized approach to the intravenous administration of contrast material for hepatic computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred patients were randomized into eight protocols. Each group received different volumes and concentrations of contrast material. For each protocol, maximum hepatic enhancement (MHE) was calculated, with an adjustment for iodine dose and patient weight. The contrast enhancement index (CEI) and optimum scanning interval were calculated for hepatic enhancement thresholds of 10-60 HU. RESULTS: The MHE calculated as a function of patient weight was 96 HU ± 19 per gram of iodine per kilogram of body weight. CEIs obtained with a contrast material concentration of 240 mg of iodine per milliliter were inferior to those obtained with a concentration of 320 or 350 mg I/mL. At low enhancement thresholds, the volume of contrast material had a more important effect than the concentration on CEI and optimum scanning interval; at high thresholds, concentration had a more important effect. CONCLUSION: For a patient of known weight, one can calculate the iodine dose needed to provide a desired level of hepatic enhancement. Use of a contrast material with a concentration of 240 mg I/mL is not recommended for dynamic incremental hepatic CT, except in small patients (eg, those weighing less than 73 kg).

KW - Computed tomography (CT), contrast media

KW - Liver neoplasms

KW - Liver, CT

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028944743&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028944743&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1148/radiology.195.2.7724752

DO - 10.1148/radiology.195.2.7724752

M3 - Article

VL - 195

SP - 353

EP - 357

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 2

ER -