Driving with roadmaps and dashboards: Using information resources to structure the decision models in service organizations

Bruce F. Chorpita, Adam Bernstein, Eric L. Daleiden, John Weisz, Bruce Chorpita, Robert Gibbons, Charles Glisson, Evelyn Polk Green, Kimberly Hoagwood, Peter S. Jensen, Kelly Kelleher, John Landsverk, Stephen Mayberg, Jeanne Miranda, Lawrence Palinkas, Sonja Schoenwald

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

81 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper illustrates the application of design principles for tools that structure clinical decision-making. If the effort to implement evidence-based practices in community services organizations is to be effective, attention must be paid to the decision-making context in which such treatments are delivered. Clinical research trials commonly occur in an environment characterized by structured decision making and expert supports. Technology has great potential to serve mental health organizations by supporting these potentially important contextual features of the research environment, through organization and reporting of clinical data into interpretable information to support decisions and anchor decision-making procedures. This article describes one example of a behavioral health reporting system designed to facilitate clinical and administrative use of evidence-based practices. The design processes underlying this system-mapping of decision points and distillation of performance information at the individual, caseload, and organizational levels-can be implemented to support clinical practice in a wide variety of settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)114-123
Number of pages10
JournalAdministration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
Volume35
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Evidence-Based Practice
Organizations
Distillation
Social Welfare
Research
Mental Health
Research Design
Clinical Trials
Technology
Health
Clinical Decision-Making

Keywords

  • Clinical reasoning
  • Evidence-based
  • Feedback
  • Organizational change
  • Technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health Policy
  • Phychiatric Mental Health

Cite this

Driving with roadmaps and dashboards : Using information resources to structure the decision models in service organizations. / Chorpita, Bruce F.; Bernstein, Adam; Daleiden, Eric L.; Weisz, John; Chorpita, Bruce; Gibbons, Robert; Glisson, Charles; Green, Evelyn Polk; Hoagwood, Kimberly; Jensen, Peter S.; Kelleher, Kelly; Landsverk, John; Mayberg, Stephen; Miranda, Jeanne; Palinkas, Lawrence; Schoenwald, Sonja.

In: Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, Vol. 35, No. 1-2, 03.2008, p. 114-123.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chorpita, BF, Bernstein, A, Daleiden, EL, Weisz, J, Chorpita, B, Gibbons, R, Glisson, C, Green, EP, Hoagwood, K, Jensen, PS, Kelleher, K, Landsverk, J, Mayberg, S, Miranda, J, Palinkas, L & Schoenwald, S 2008, 'Driving with roadmaps and dashboards: Using information resources to structure the decision models in service organizations', Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, vol. 35, no. 1-2, pp. 114-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-007-0151-x
Chorpita, Bruce F. ; Bernstein, Adam ; Daleiden, Eric L. ; Weisz, John ; Chorpita, Bruce ; Gibbons, Robert ; Glisson, Charles ; Green, Evelyn Polk ; Hoagwood, Kimberly ; Jensen, Peter S. ; Kelleher, Kelly ; Landsverk, John ; Mayberg, Stephen ; Miranda, Jeanne ; Palinkas, Lawrence ; Schoenwald, Sonja. / Driving with roadmaps and dashboards : Using information resources to structure the decision models in service organizations. In: Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 2008 ; Vol. 35, No. 1-2. pp. 114-123.
@article{61d6ebf5bed34b11ba89a097312843c8,
title = "Driving with roadmaps and dashboards: Using information resources to structure the decision models in service organizations",
abstract = "This paper illustrates the application of design principles for tools that structure clinical decision-making. If the effort to implement evidence-based practices in community services organizations is to be effective, attention must be paid to the decision-making context in which such treatments are delivered. Clinical research trials commonly occur in an environment characterized by structured decision making and expert supports. Technology has great potential to serve mental health organizations by supporting these potentially important contextual features of the research environment, through organization and reporting of clinical data into interpretable information to support decisions and anchor decision-making procedures. This article describes one example of a behavioral health reporting system designed to facilitate clinical and administrative use of evidence-based practices. The design processes underlying this system-mapping of decision points and distillation of performance information at the individual, caseload, and organizational levels-can be implemented to support clinical practice in a wide variety of settings.",
keywords = "Clinical reasoning, Evidence-based, Feedback, Organizational change, Technology",
author = "Chorpita, {Bruce F.} and Adam Bernstein and Daleiden, {Eric L.} and John Weisz and Bruce Chorpita and Robert Gibbons and Charles Glisson and Green, {Evelyn Polk} and Kimberly Hoagwood and Jensen, {Peter S.} and Kelly Kelleher and John Landsverk and Stephen Mayberg and Jeanne Miranda and Lawrence Palinkas and Sonja Schoenwald",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s10488-007-0151-x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "114--123",
journal = "Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research",
issn = "0894-587X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Driving with roadmaps and dashboards

T2 - Using information resources to structure the decision models in service organizations

AU - Chorpita, Bruce F.

AU - Bernstein, Adam

AU - Daleiden, Eric L.

AU - Weisz, John

AU - Chorpita, Bruce

AU - Gibbons, Robert

AU - Glisson, Charles

AU - Green, Evelyn Polk

AU - Hoagwood, Kimberly

AU - Jensen, Peter S.

AU - Kelleher, Kelly

AU - Landsverk, John

AU - Mayberg, Stephen

AU - Miranda, Jeanne

AU - Palinkas, Lawrence

AU - Schoenwald, Sonja

PY - 2008/3

Y1 - 2008/3

N2 - This paper illustrates the application of design principles for tools that structure clinical decision-making. If the effort to implement evidence-based practices in community services organizations is to be effective, attention must be paid to the decision-making context in which such treatments are delivered. Clinical research trials commonly occur in an environment characterized by structured decision making and expert supports. Technology has great potential to serve mental health organizations by supporting these potentially important contextual features of the research environment, through organization and reporting of clinical data into interpretable information to support decisions and anchor decision-making procedures. This article describes one example of a behavioral health reporting system designed to facilitate clinical and administrative use of evidence-based practices. The design processes underlying this system-mapping of decision points and distillation of performance information at the individual, caseload, and organizational levels-can be implemented to support clinical practice in a wide variety of settings.

AB - This paper illustrates the application of design principles for tools that structure clinical decision-making. If the effort to implement evidence-based practices in community services organizations is to be effective, attention must be paid to the decision-making context in which such treatments are delivered. Clinical research trials commonly occur in an environment characterized by structured decision making and expert supports. Technology has great potential to serve mental health organizations by supporting these potentially important contextual features of the research environment, through organization and reporting of clinical data into interpretable information to support decisions and anchor decision-making procedures. This article describes one example of a behavioral health reporting system designed to facilitate clinical and administrative use of evidence-based practices. The design processes underlying this system-mapping of decision points and distillation of performance information at the individual, caseload, and organizational levels-can be implemented to support clinical practice in a wide variety of settings.

KW - Clinical reasoning

KW - Evidence-based

KW - Feedback

KW - Organizational change

KW - Technology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37649011816&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=37649011816&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10488-007-0151-x

DO - 10.1007/s10488-007-0151-x

M3 - Article

C2 - 17987376

AN - SCOPUS:37649011816

VL - 35

SP - 114

EP - 123

JO - Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research

JF - Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research

SN - 0894-587X

IS - 1-2

ER -