Double-balloon enteroscopy in Crohn's disease: Findings and impact on management in a multicenter retrospective study

Adam Rahman, Andrew Ross, Jonathan A Leighton, Drew Schembre, Lauren Gerson, Simon K. Lo, Irving Waxman, Charles Dye, Carol Semrad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) is effective in visualizing the small bowel to perform biopsy sampling and interventions. Few studies have evaluated the utility of DBE in patients with known or suspected Crohn's disease (CD). Objective To evaluate the use of DBE in the diagnosis and impact on patient management in known and suspected CD and to compare capsule endoscopy (CE) with DBE findings. Design Retrospective study from August 2004 to August 2009 of DBE procedures. Setting Five academic, tertiary U.S. centers. Patients Patients with known or suspected CD. Main Outcome Measures Diagnostic yield, impact on patient management, and comparison of DBE to CE findings in patients with known and suspected CD. Results We analyzed 98 DBE procedures performed in 81 patients (38 with known CD and 43 with suspected CD). For patients with CD, common indications were abdominal pain and bleeding/anemia. The diagnostic yield was 87% (33/38 patients). The impact on subsequent management decisions was 82% (31/38). Common indications for DBE in patients with suspected CD were abnormal CE or other imaging. The diagnostic yield was 79% (34/43 patients). The impact on subsequent management decisions was 77% (33/43). In 17% of patients (14/81), DBE failed to reach the target lesion. There was 1 perforation, 3 strictures dilated, and 1 of 2 retained capsules recovered. When CE was followed by DBE, 46% of lesions were confirmed on DBE. Limitations Retrospective analysis, imperfect criterion standard. Conclusions DBE is an effective technique for assessment of the small bowel in known and suspected CD and affects management. Failure to reach target areas with DBE is not uncommon, and perforations can occur. There is poor correlation between CE and DBE.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)102-107
Number of pages6
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume82
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2015

Fingerprint

Double-Balloon Enteroscopy
Crohn Disease
Multicenter Studies
Retrospective Studies
Capsule Endoscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Double-balloon enteroscopy in Crohn's disease : Findings and impact on management in a multicenter retrospective study. / Rahman, Adam; Ross, Andrew; Leighton, Jonathan A; Schembre, Drew; Gerson, Lauren; Lo, Simon K.; Waxman, Irving; Dye, Charles; Semrad, Carol.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 82, No. 1, 01.07.2015, p. 102-107.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rahman, Adam ; Ross, Andrew ; Leighton, Jonathan A ; Schembre, Drew ; Gerson, Lauren ; Lo, Simon K. ; Waxman, Irving ; Dye, Charles ; Semrad, Carol. / Double-balloon enteroscopy in Crohn's disease : Findings and impact on management in a multicenter retrospective study. In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2015 ; Vol. 82, No. 1. pp. 102-107.
@article{2d4bc32583fd4e4598fca130a9637d8c,
title = "Double-balloon enteroscopy in Crohn's disease: Findings and impact on management in a multicenter retrospective study",
abstract = "Background Double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) is effective in visualizing the small bowel to perform biopsy sampling and interventions. Few studies have evaluated the utility of DBE in patients with known or suspected Crohn's disease (CD). Objective To evaluate the use of DBE in the diagnosis and impact on patient management in known and suspected CD and to compare capsule endoscopy (CE) with DBE findings. Design Retrospective study from August 2004 to August 2009 of DBE procedures. Setting Five academic, tertiary U.S. centers. Patients Patients with known or suspected CD. Main Outcome Measures Diagnostic yield, impact on patient management, and comparison of DBE to CE findings in patients with known and suspected CD. Results We analyzed 98 DBE procedures performed in 81 patients (38 with known CD and 43 with suspected CD). For patients with CD, common indications were abdominal pain and bleeding/anemia. The diagnostic yield was 87{\%} (33/38 patients). The impact on subsequent management decisions was 82{\%} (31/38). Common indications for DBE in patients with suspected CD were abnormal CE or other imaging. The diagnostic yield was 79{\%} (34/43 patients). The impact on subsequent management decisions was 77{\%} (33/43). In 17{\%} of patients (14/81), DBE failed to reach the target lesion. There was 1 perforation, 3 strictures dilated, and 1 of 2 retained capsules recovered. When CE was followed by DBE, 46{\%} of lesions were confirmed on DBE. Limitations Retrospective analysis, imperfect criterion standard. Conclusions DBE is an effective technique for assessment of the small bowel in known and suspected CD and affects management. Failure to reach target areas with DBE is not uncommon, and perforations can occur. There is poor correlation between CE and DBE.",
author = "Adam Rahman and Andrew Ross and Leighton, {Jonathan A} and Drew Schembre and Lauren Gerson and Lo, {Simon K.} and Irving Waxman and Charles Dye and Carol Semrad",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.039",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "82",
pages = "102--107",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Double-balloon enteroscopy in Crohn's disease

T2 - Findings and impact on management in a multicenter retrospective study

AU - Rahman, Adam

AU - Ross, Andrew

AU - Leighton, Jonathan A

AU - Schembre, Drew

AU - Gerson, Lauren

AU - Lo, Simon K.

AU - Waxman, Irving

AU - Dye, Charles

AU - Semrad, Carol

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - Background Double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) is effective in visualizing the small bowel to perform biopsy sampling and interventions. Few studies have evaluated the utility of DBE in patients with known or suspected Crohn's disease (CD). Objective To evaluate the use of DBE in the diagnosis and impact on patient management in known and suspected CD and to compare capsule endoscopy (CE) with DBE findings. Design Retrospective study from August 2004 to August 2009 of DBE procedures. Setting Five academic, tertiary U.S. centers. Patients Patients with known or suspected CD. Main Outcome Measures Diagnostic yield, impact on patient management, and comparison of DBE to CE findings in patients with known and suspected CD. Results We analyzed 98 DBE procedures performed in 81 patients (38 with known CD and 43 with suspected CD). For patients with CD, common indications were abdominal pain and bleeding/anemia. The diagnostic yield was 87% (33/38 patients). The impact on subsequent management decisions was 82% (31/38). Common indications for DBE in patients with suspected CD were abnormal CE or other imaging. The diagnostic yield was 79% (34/43 patients). The impact on subsequent management decisions was 77% (33/43). In 17% of patients (14/81), DBE failed to reach the target lesion. There was 1 perforation, 3 strictures dilated, and 1 of 2 retained capsules recovered. When CE was followed by DBE, 46% of lesions were confirmed on DBE. Limitations Retrospective analysis, imperfect criterion standard. Conclusions DBE is an effective technique for assessment of the small bowel in known and suspected CD and affects management. Failure to reach target areas with DBE is not uncommon, and perforations can occur. There is poor correlation between CE and DBE.

AB - Background Double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) is effective in visualizing the small bowel to perform biopsy sampling and interventions. Few studies have evaluated the utility of DBE in patients with known or suspected Crohn's disease (CD). Objective To evaluate the use of DBE in the diagnosis and impact on patient management in known and suspected CD and to compare capsule endoscopy (CE) with DBE findings. Design Retrospective study from August 2004 to August 2009 of DBE procedures. Setting Five academic, tertiary U.S. centers. Patients Patients with known or suspected CD. Main Outcome Measures Diagnostic yield, impact on patient management, and comparison of DBE to CE findings in patients with known and suspected CD. Results We analyzed 98 DBE procedures performed in 81 patients (38 with known CD and 43 with suspected CD). For patients with CD, common indications were abdominal pain and bleeding/anemia. The diagnostic yield was 87% (33/38 patients). The impact on subsequent management decisions was 82% (31/38). Common indications for DBE in patients with suspected CD were abnormal CE or other imaging. The diagnostic yield was 79% (34/43 patients). The impact on subsequent management decisions was 77% (33/43). In 17% of patients (14/81), DBE failed to reach the target lesion. There was 1 perforation, 3 strictures dilated, and 1 of 2 retained capsules recovered. When CE was followed by DBE, 46% of lesions were confirmed on DBE. Limitations Retrospective analysis, imperfect criterion standard. Conclusions DBE is an effective technique for assessment of the small bowel in known and suspected CD and affects management. Failure to reach target areas with DBE is not uncommon, and perforations can occur. There is poor correlation between CE and DBE.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930928477&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930928477&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.039

DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.039

M3 - Article

C2 - 25840927

AN - SCOPUS:84930928477

VL - 82

SP - 102

EP - 107

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 1

ER -