Does the evidence make a difference in consumer behavior? Sales of supplements before and after publication of negative research results

Jon C Tilburt, Ezekiel J. Emanuel, Franklin G. Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the public consumption of herbs, vitamins, and supplements changes in light of emerging negative evidence. METHODS: We describe trends in annual US sales of five major supplements in temporal relationship with publication of research from three top US general medical journals published from 2001 through early 2006 and the number of news citations associated with each publication using the Lexus-Nexis database. RESULTS: In four of five supplements (St. John's wort, echinacea, saw palmetto, and glucosamine), there was little or no change in sales trends after publication of research results. In one instance, however, dramatic changes in sales occurred following publication of data suggesting harm from high doses of vitamin E. CONCLUSION: Results reporting harm may have a greater impact on supplement consumption than those demonstrating lack of efficacy. In order for clinical trial evidence to influence public behavior, there needs to be a better understanding of the factors that influence the translation of evidence in the public.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1495-1498
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume23
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2008

Fingerprint

Publications
Research
Echinacea
Hypericum
Glucosamine
Vitamin E
Vitamins
Clinical Trials
Databases
Consumer Behavior

Keywords

  • Complementary therapies
  • Dietary supplements
  • Health behaviors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Does the evidence make a difference in consumer behavior? Sales of supplements before and after publication of negative research results. / Tilburt, Jon C; Emanuel, Ezekiel J.; Miller, Franklin G.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 23, No. 9, 09.2008, p. 1495-1498.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1d6da0abce184fb5823badcc0483e779,
title = "Does the evidence make a difference in consumer behavior? Sales of supplements before and after publication of negative research results",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To determine if the public consumption of herbs, vitamins, and supplements changes in light of emerging negative evidence. METHODS: We describe trends in annual US sales of five major supplements in temporal relationship with publication of research from three top US general medical journals published from 2001 through early 2006 and the number of news citations associated with each publication using the Lexus-Nexis database. RESULTS: In four of five supplements (St. John's wort, echinacea, saw palmetto, and glucosamine), there was little or no change in sales trends after publication of research results. In one instance, however, dramatic changes in sales occurred following publication of data suggesting harm from high doses of vitamin E. CONCLUSION: Results reporting harm may have a greater impact on supplement consumption than those demonstrating lack of efficacy. In order for clinical trial evidence to influence public behavior, there needs to be a better understanding of the factors that influence the translation of evidence in the public.",
keywords = "Complementary therapies, Dietary supplements, Health behaviors",
author = "Tilburt, {Jon C} and Emanuel, {Ezekiel J.} and Miller, {Franklin G.}",
year = "2008",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s11606-008-0704-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "1495--1498",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does the evidence make a difference in consumer behavior? Sales of supplements before and after publication of negative research results

AU - Tilburt, Jon C

AU - Emanuel, Ezekiel J.

AU - Miller, Franklin G.

PY - 2008/9

Y1 - 2008/9

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To determine if the public consumption of herbs, vitamins, and supplements changes in light of emerging negative evidence. METHODS: We describe trends in annual US sales of five major supplements in temporal relationship with publication of research from three top US general medical journals published from 2001 through early 2006 and the number of news citations associated with each publication using the Lexus-Nexis database. RESULTS: In four of five supplements (St. John's wort, echinacea, saw palmetto, and glucosamine), there was little or no change in sales trends after publication of research results. In one instance, however, dramatic changes in sales occurred following publication of data suggesting harm from high doses of vitamin E. CONCLUSION: Results reporting harm may have a greater impact on supplement consumption than those demonstrating lack of efficacy. In order for clinical trial evidence to influence public behavior, there needs to be a better understanding of the factors that influence the translation of evidence in the public.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To determine if the public consumption of herbs, vitamins, and supplements changes in light of emerging negative evidence. METHODS: We describe trends in annual US sales of five major supplements in temporal relationship with publication of research from three top US general medical journals published from 2001 through early 2006 and the number of news citations associated with each publication using the Lexus-Nexis database. RESULTS: In four of five supplements (St. John's wort, echinacea, saw palmetto, and glucosamine), there was little or no change in sales trends after publication of research results. In one instance, however, dramatic changes in sales occurred following publication of data suggesting harm from high doses of vitamin E. CONCLUSION: Results reporting harm may have a greater impact on supplement consumption than those demonstrating lack of efficacy. In order for clinical trial evidence to influence public behavior, there needs to be a better understanding of the factors that influence the translation of evidence in the public.

KW - Complementary therapies

KW - Dietary supplements

KW - Health behaviors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=50049098837&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=50049098837&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11606-008-0704-z

DO - 10.1007/s11606-008-0704-z

M3 - Article

C2 - 18618194

AN - SCOPUS:50049098837

VL - 23

SP - 1495

EP - 1498

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 9

ER -