Does the chronic care model meet the emerging needs of people living with multimorbidity? A systematic review and thematic synthesis

Kasey R. Boehmer, Abd Moain Abu Dabrh, Michael R. Gionfriddo, Patricia Erwin, Victor Manuel Montori

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background The Chronic Care Model (CCM) emerged in the 1990s as an approach to re-organize primary care and implement critical elements that enable it to proactively attend to patients with chronic conditions. The chronic care landscape has evolved further, as most patients now present with multiple chronic conditions and increasing psychosocial complexity. These patients face accumulating and overwhelming complexity resulting from the sum of uncoordinated responses to each of their problems. Minimally Disruptive Medicine (MDM) was proposed to respond to this challenge, aiming at improving outcomes that matter to patients with the smallest burden of treatment. We sought to critically appraise the extent to which MDM constructs (e.g., reducing patient work, improving patients’ capacity) have been adopted within CCM implementations. Methods We conducted a systematic review and qualitative thematic synthesis of reports of CCM implementations published from 2011–2016. Results CCM implementations were mostly aligned with the healthcare system’s goals, condition-specific, and targeted disease-specific outcomes or healthcare utilization. No CCM implementation addressed patient work. Few reduced treatment workload without adding additional tasks. Implementations supported patient capacity by offering information, but rarely offered practical resources (e.g., financial assistance, transportation), helped patients reframe their biography with chronic illness, or assisted them in engaging with a supportive social network. Few implementations aimed at improving functional status or quality of life, and only one-third of studies were targeted for patients of low socioeconomic status. Conclusion MDM provides a lens to operationalize how to care for patients with multiple chronic conditions, but its constructs remain mostly absent from how implementations of the CCM are currently reported. Improvements to the primary care of patients with multimorbidity may benefit from the application of MDM, and the current CCM implementations that do apply MDM constructs should be considered exemplars for future implementation work.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere0190852
JournalPLoS One
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018

Fingerprint

systematic review
Comorbidity
Medicine
synthesis
medicine
patient care
health services
Primary Health Care
Transportation of Patients
Delivery of Health Care
functional status
Lenses
social networks
socioeconomic status
Workload
Lens
quality of life
chronic diseases
Social Class
Social Support

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Does the chronic care model meet the emerging needs of people living with multimorbidity? A systematic review and thematic synthesis. / Boehmer, Kasey R.; Abu Dabrh, Abd Moain; Gionfriddo, Michael R.; Erwin, Patricia; Montori, Victor Manuel.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 13, No. 2, e0190852, 01.02.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{1a4d584086974b5db2bdeaa47cdec2aa,
title = "Does the chronic care model meet the emerging needs of people living with multimorbidity? A systematic review and thematic synthesis",
abstract = "Background The Chronic Care Model (CCM) emerged in the 1990s as an approach to re-organize primary care and implement critical elements that enable it to proactively attend to patients with chronic conditions. The chronic care landscape has evolved further, as most patients now present with multiple chronic conditions and increasing psychosocial complexity. These patients face accumulating and overwhelming complexity resulting from the sum of uncoordinated responses to each of their problems. Minimally Disruptive Medicine (MDM) was proposed to respond to this challenge, aiming at improving outcomes that matter to patients with the smallest burden of treatment. We sought to critically appraise the extent to which MDM constructs (e.g., reducing patient work, improving patients’ capacity) have been adopted within CCM implementations. Methods We conducted a systematic review and qualitative thematic synthesis of reports of CCM implementations published from 2011–2016. Results CCM implementations were mostly aligned with the healthcare system’s goals, condition-specific, and targeted disease-specific outcomes or healthcare utilization. No CCM implementation addressed patient work. Few reduced treatment workload without adding additional tasks. Implementations supported patient capacity by offering information, but rarely offered practical resources (e.g., financial assistance, transportation), helped patients reframe their biography with chronic illness, or assisted them in engaging with a supportive social network. Few implementations aimed at improving functional status or quality of life, and only one-third of studies were targeted for patients of low socioeconomic status. Conclusion MDM provides a lens to operationalize how to care for patients with multiple chronic conditions, but its constructs remain mostly absent from how implementations of the CCM are currently reported. Improvements to the primary care of patients with multimorbidity may benefit from the application of MDM, and the current CCM implementations that do apply MDM constructs should be considered exemplars for future implementation work.",
author = "Boehmer, {Kasey R.} and {Abu Dabrh}, {Abd Moain} and Gionfriddo, {Michael R.} and Patricia Erwin and Montori, {Victor Manuel}",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0190852",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does the chronic care model meet the emerging needs of people living with multimorbidity? A systematic review and thematic synthesis

AU - Boehmer, Kasey R.

AU - Abu Dabrh, Abd Moain

AU - Gionfriddo, Michael R.

AU - Erwin, Patricia

AU - Montori, Victor Manuel

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - Background The Chronic Care Model (CCM) emerged in the 1990s as an approach to re-organize primary care and implement critical elements that enable it to proactively attend to patients with chronic conditions. The chronic care landscape has evolved further, as most patients now present with multiple chronic conditions and increasing psychosocial complexity. These patients face accumulating and overwhelming complexity resulting from the sum of uncoordinated responses to each of their problems. Minimally Disruptive Medicine (MDM) was proposed to respond to this challenge, aiming at improving outcomes that matter to patients with the smallest burden of treatment. We sought to critically appraise the extent to which MDM constructs (e.g., reducing patient work, improving patients’ capacity) have been adopted within CCM implementations. Methods We conducted a systematic review and qualitative thematic synthesis of reports of CCM implementations published from 2011–2016. Results CCM implementations were mostly aligned with the healthcare system’s goals, condition-specific, and targeted disease-specific outcomes or healthcare utilization. No CCM implementation addressed patient work. Few reduced treatment workload without adding additional tasks. Implementations supported patient capacity by offering information, but rarely offered practical resources (e.g., financial assistance, transportation), helped patients reframe their biography with chronic illness, or assisted them in engaging with a supportive social network. Few implementations aimed at improving functional status or quality of life, and only one-third of studies were targeted for patients of low socioeconomic status. Conclusion MDM provides a lens to operationalize how to care for patients with multiple chronic conditions, but its constructs remain mostly absent from how implementations of the CCM are currently reported. Improvements to the primary care of patients with multimorbidity may benefit from the application of MDM, and the current CCM implementations that do apply MDM constructs should be considered exemplars for future implementation work.

AB - Background The Chronic Care Model (CCM) emerged in the 1990s as an approach to re-organize primary care and implement critical elements that enable it to proactively attend to patients with chronic conditions. The chronic care landscape has evolved further, as most patients now present with multiple chronic conditions and increasing psychosocial complexity. These patients face accumulating and overwhelming complexity resulting from the sum of uncoordinated responses to each of their problems. Minimally Disruptive Medicine (MDM) was proposed to respond to this challenge, aiming at improving outcomes that matter to patients with the smallest burden of treatment. We sought to critically appraise the extent to which MDM constructs (e.g., reducing patient work, improving patients’ capacity) have been adopted within CCM implementations. Methods We conducted a systematic review and qualitative thematic synthesis of reports of CCM implementations published from 2011–2016. Results CCM implementations were mostly aligned with the healthcare system’s goals, condition-specific, and targeted disease-specific outcomes or healthcare utilization. No CCM implementation addressed patient work. Few reduced treatment workload without adding additional tasks. Implementations supported patient capacity by offering information, but rarely offered practical resources (e.g., financial assistance, transportation), helped patients reframe their biography with chronic illness, or assisted them in engaging with a supportive social network. Few implementations aimed at improving functional status or quality of life, and only one-third of studies were targeted for patients of low socioeconomic status. Conclusion MDM provides a lens to operationalize how to care for patients with multiple chronic conditions, but its constructs remain mostly absent from how implementations of the CCM are currently reported. Improvements to the primary care of patients with multimorbidity may benefit from the application of MDM, and the current CCM implementations that do apply MDM constructs should be considered exemplars for future implementation work.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041944768&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041944768&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0190852

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0190852

M3 - Review article

VL - 13

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 2

M1 - e0190852

ER -