Does gender influence outcomes from a multidisciplinary intervention for quality of life designed for patients with advanced cancer?

Maria I. Lapid, Pamela J. Atherton, Simon Kung, Andrea L. Cheville, Molly McNiven, Jeff A. Sloan, Matthew M. Clark, Teresa A. Rummans

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations


Purpose: Cancer treatment can profoundly impact the patient's quality of life (QOL). It has been well documented that there are gender differences in the symptoms associated with cancer treatment. This study explores the impact of gender on QOL for patients with newly diagnosed advanced cancer. Methods: A randomized, controlled clinical trial in patients receiving radiotherapy for advanced cancer demonstrated maintenance of QOL with a six session multidisciplinary structured intervention compared to controls. This current study reports the gender differences in that trial. Outcome measures included the functional assessment of cancer therapy-general (FACT-G), linear analog self-assessment (LASA), and profile of mood states (POMS) at baseline and weeks 4, 27, and 52. Kruskal-Wallis was used to compare QOL scores. Results: One hundred thirty-one patients (45 women and 86 men, mean age 58.7) participated in the clinical trial. At week 4 postintervention, women in the intervention group had statistically significant improvement in their FACT-G score, FACT-G physical well-being subscale, LASA fatigue, POMS total score, POMS fatigue-inertia subscale, and POMS confusion-bewilderment subscale (p < 0.05). Men receiving the intervention had a smaller decrease in FACT-G score compared to controls (p = 0.048) and also worsened on the LASA financial (p = 0.02). At week 27, the only gender difference was that intervention group men had more POMS anger-hostility (p = 0.009). By week 52, there were no statistically significant gender differences in any of the QOL measures. Conclusions: Gender-based differences appear to play a role in the early, but not late, response to a multidisciplinary intervention to improve QOL for patients with advanced cancer, suggesting that early interventions can be tailored for each gender.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2485-2490
Number of pages6
JournalSupportive Care in Cancer
Issue number9
StatePublished - Sep 2013


  • Men
  • Oncology
  • Psychosocial
  • Radiation therapy
  • Well-being
  • Women

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology


Dive into the research topics of 'Does gender influence outcomes from a multidisciplinary intervention for quality of life designed for patients with advanced cancer?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this