Does ankle aspiration for acute ankle fractures result in pain relief? A prospective randomized double-blinded placebo controlled trial

Timothy J. Ewald, Pamela Holte, Joseph R. Cass, William W. Cross, S. Andrew Sems

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Does ankle aspiration help with pain control in patients with ankle fractures? Design: Prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Setting: Level 1 Academic Medical Center. Patients/Participants: Consecutive skeletally mature patients with ankle fractures. Intervention: Randomized between ankle aspiration and sham procedure. Main Outcome Measurements: Pain scores for 72 hours after injury and pain medicine usage. Results: Comparison between study subjects receiving ankle aspiration and sham procedure showed no significant differences in pain scores acutely in the emergency department or within 3 days after injury. There were also no statistically significant differences in pain medicine usage within 3 days after injury. Secondary outcomes, including lower leg volume, 6-month functional outcome scores, and complication rate, also showed no significant differences between subjects receiving aspiration and the sham procedure. Conclusions: Aspiration of acute ankle fractures does not result in decreased pain scores or opioid usage after aspiration. Aspiration of acute ankle fractures does not provide measurable clinical benefit. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)399-403
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Volume29
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 22 2015

Fingerprint

Ankle Fractures
Ankle
Placebos
Pain
Wounds and Injuries
Medicine
Pain Measurement
Aspirations (Psychology)
Opioid Analgesics
Hospital Emergency Service
Leg
Randomized Controlled Trials

Keywords

  • ankle fracture
  • aspiration
  • hemarthrosis
  • pain
  • trauma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Does ankle aspiration for acute ankle fractures result in pain relief? A prospective randomized double-blinded placebo controlled trial. / Ewald, Timothy J.; Holte, Pamela; Cass, Joseph R.; Cross, William W.; Sems, S. Andrew.

In: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, Vol. 29, No. 9, 22.09.2015, p. 399-403.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ewald, Timothy J. ; Holte, Pamela ; Cass, Joseph R. ; Cross, William W. ; Sems, S. Andrew. / Does ankle aspiration for acute ankle fractures result in pain relief? A prospective randomized double-blinded placebo controlled trial. In: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 2015 ; Vol. 29, No. 9. pp. 399-403.
@article{144a6af63b0a4d31b5acc79b97341746,
title = "Does ankle aspiration for acute ankle fractures result in pain relief? A prospective randomized double-blinded placebo controlled trial",
abstract = "Objectives: Does ankle aspiration help with pain control in patients with ankle fractures? Design: Prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Setting: Level 1 Academic Medical Center. Patients/Participants: Consecutive skeletally mature patients with ankle fractures. Intervention: Randomized between ankle aspiration and sham procedure. Main Outcome Measurements: Pain scores for 72 hours after injury and pain medicine usage. Results: Comparison between study subjects receiving ankle aspiration and sham procedure showed no significant differences in pain scores acutely in the emergency department or within 3 days after injury. There were also no statistically significant differences in pain medicine usage within 3 days after injury. Secondary outcomes, including lower leg volume, 6-month functional outcome scores, and complication rate, also showed no significant differences between subjects receiving aspiration and the sham procedure. Conclusions: Aspiration of acute ankle fractures does not result in decreased pain scores or opioid usage after aspiration. Aspiration of acute ankle fractures does not provide measurable clinical benefit. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.",
keywords = "ankle fracture, aspiration, hemarthrosis, pain, trauma",
author = "Ewald, {Timothy J.} and Pamela Holte and Cass, {Joseph R.} and Cross, {William W.} and Sems, {S. Andrew}",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1097/BOT.0000000000000314",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "399--403",
journal = "Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma",
issn = "0890-5339",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does ankle aspiration for acute ankle fractures result in pain relief? A prospective randomized double-blinded placebo controlled trial

AU - Ewald, Timothy J.

AU - Holte, Pamela

AU - Cass, Joseph R.

AU - Cross, William W.

AU - Sems, S. Andrew

PY - 2015/9/22

Y1 - 2015/9/22

N2 - Objectives: Does ankle aspiration help with pain control in patients with ankle fractures? Design: Prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Setting: Level 1 Academic Medical Center. Patients/Participants: Consecutive skeletally mature patients with ankle fractures. Intervention: Randomized between ankle aspiration and sham procedure. Main Outcome Measurements: Pain scores for 72 hours after injury and pain medicine usage. Results: Comparison between study subjects receiving ankle aspiration and sham procedure showed no significant differences in pain scores acutely in the emergency department or within 3 days after injury. There were also no statistically significant differences in pain medicine usage within 3 days after injury. Secondary outcomes, including lower leg volume, 6-month functional outcome scores, and complication rate, also showed no significant differences between subjects receiving aspiration and the sham procedure. Conclusions: Aspiration of acute ankle fractures does not result in decreased pain scores or opioid usage after aspiration. Aspiration of acute ankle fractures does not provide measurable clinical benefit. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

AB - Objectives: Does ankle aspiration help with pain control in patients with ankle fractures? Design: Prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Setting: Level 1 Academic Medical Center. Patients/Participants: Consecutive skeletally mature patients with ankle fractures. Intervention: Randomized between ankle aspiration and sham procedure. Main Outcome Measurements: Pain scores for 72 hours after injury and pain medicine usage. Results: Comparison between study subjects receiving ankle aspiration and sham procedure showed no significant differences in pain scores acutely in the emergency department or within 3 days after injury. There were also no statistically significant differences in pain medicine usage within 3 days after injury. Secondary outcomes, including lower leg volume, 6-month functional outcome scores, and complication rate, also showed no significant differences between subjects receiving aspiration and the sham procedure. Conclusions: Aspiration of acute ankle fractures does not result in decreased pain scores or opioid usage after aspiration. Aspiration of acute ankle fractures does not provide measurable clinical benefit. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

KW - ankle fracture

KW - aspiration

KW - hemarthrosis

KW - pain

KW - trauma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940212887&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940212887&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000314

DO - 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000314

M3 - Article

C2 - 25756917

AN - SCOPUS:84940212887

VL - 29

SP - 399

EP - 403

JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

SN - 0890-5339

IS - 9

ER -