Do trauma activations affect interruptions in the emergency department?

Katherine L. Forsyth, Hunter J. Hawthorne, Anna R. Linden, Nibras El-Sherif, Rachelen S. Varghese, Susan Hallbeck, Renaldo Blocker

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Clinicians have anecdotally indicated that interruptions increase following trauma activations in the emergency department (ED), yet it is unknown whether interruptions change following the end of a trauma case. This study aimed to examine the interruption characteristics of clinicians that participate in trauma activations before and after activations using the SEIPS model. Observers shadowed ED clinicians across entire shifts and logged interruptions that affected clinicians in a tablet PC-based tool. Interruption characteristics captured included duration, nature, location, and task priority. Trauma activations lasting more than five minutes were also recorded. Only interruptions occurring within one-hour of trauma activations were included in the analysis. Chi-square analyses identified significant associations between SEIPS-categorized interruptions and the interruption priority, p < 0.01, and between the SEIPS-categorized interruptions and the interruption location, p = 0.01, pre- and post-trauma activations. Identifying these associations revealed key opportunities to reduce unnecessary interruptions in the ED.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2017 International Annual Meeting, HFES 2017
PublisherHuman Factors an Ergonomics Society Inc.
Pages643-647
Number of pages5
Volume2017-October
ISBN (Electronic)9780945289531
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017
EventHuman Factors and Ergonomics Society 2017 International Annual Meeting, HFES 2017 - Austin, United States
Duration: Oct 9 2017Oct 13 2017

Other

OtherHuman Factors and Ergonomics Society 2017 International Annual Meeting, HFES 2017
CountryUnited States
CityAustin
Period10/9/1710/13/17

Fingerprint

activation
trauma
Chemical activation
PC

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics

Cite this

Forsyth, K. L., Hawthorne, H. J., Linden, A. R., El-Sherif, N., Varghese, R. S., Hallbeck, S., & Blocker, R. (2017). Do trauma activations affect interruptions in the emergency department? In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2017 International Annual Meeting, HFES 2017 (Vol. 2017-October, pp. 643-647). Human Factors an Ergonomics Society Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601645

Do trauma activations affect interruptions in the emergency department? / Forsyth, Katherine L.; Hawthorne, Hunter J.; Linden, Anna R.; El-Sherif, Nibras; Varghese, Rachelen S.; Hallbeck, Susan; Blocker, Renaldo.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2017 International Annual Meeting, HFES 2017. Vol. 2017-October Human Factors an Ergonomics Society Inc., 2017. p. 643-647.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Forsyth, KL, Hawthorne, HJ, Linden, AR, El-Sherif, N, Varghese, RS, Hallbeck, S & Blocker, R 2017, Do trauma activations affect interruptions in the emergency department? in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2017 International Annual Meeting, HFES 2017. vol. 2017-October, Human Factors an Ergonomics Society Inc., pp. 643-647, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2017 International Annual Meeting, HFES 2017, Austin, United States, 10/9/17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601645
Forsyth KL, Hawthorne HJ, Linden AR, El-Sherif N, Varghese RS, Hallbeck S et al. Do trauma activations affect interruptions in the emergency department? In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2017 International Annual Meeting, HFES 2017. Vol. 2017-October. Human Factors an Ergonomics Society Inc. 2017. p. 643-647 https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601645
Forsyth, Katherine L. ; Hawthorne, Hunter J. ; Linden, Anna R. ; El-Sherif, Nibras ; Varghese, Rachelen S. ; Hallbeck, Susan ; Blocker, Renaldo. / Do trauma activations affect interruptions in the emergency department?. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2017 International Annual Meeting, HFES 2017. Vol. 2017-October Human Factors an Ergonomics Society Inc., 2017. pp. 643-647
@inproceedings{81bd69a611394a1f8d4059e68d2e4c35,
title = "Do trauma activations affect interruptions in the emergency department?",
abstract = "Clinicians have anecdotally indicated that interruptions increase following trauma activations in the emergency department (ED), yet it is unknown whether interruptions change following the end of a trauma case. This study aimed to examine the interruption characteristics of clinicians that participate in trauma activations before and after activations using the SEIPS model. Observers shadowed ED clinicians across entire shifts and logged interruptions that affected clinicians in a tablet PC-based tool. Interruption characteristics captured included duration, nature, location, and task priority. Trauma activations lasting more than five minutes were also recorded. Only interruptions occurring within one-hour of trauma activations were included in the analysis. Chi-square analyses identified significant associations between SEIPS-categorized interruptions and the interruption priority, p < 0.01, and between the SEIPS-categorized interruptions and the interruption location, p = 0.01, pre- and post-trauma activations. Identifying these associations revealed key opportunities to reduce unnecessary interruptions in the ED.",
author = "Forsyth, {Katherine L.} and Hawthorne, {Hunter J.} and Linden, {Anna R.} and Nibras El-Sherif and Varghese, {Rachelen S.} and Susan Hallbeck and Renaldo Blocker",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1541931213601645",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2017-October",
pages = "643--647",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2017 International Annual Meeting, HFES 2017",
publisher = "Human Factors an Ergonomics Society Inc.",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Do trauma activations affect interruptions in the emergency department?

AU - Forsyth, Katherine L.

AU - Hawthorne, Hunter J.

AU - Linden, Anna R.

AU - El-Sherif, Nibras

AU - Varghese, Rachelen S.

AU - Hallbeck, Susan

AU - Blocker, Renaldo

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Clinicians have anecdotally indicated that interruptions increase following trauma activations in the emergency department (ED), yet it is unknown whether interruptions change following the end of a trauma case. This study aimed to examine the interruption characteristics of clinicians that participate in trauma activations before and after activations using the SEIPS model. Observers shadowed ED clinicians across entire shifts and logged interruptions that affected clinicians in a tablet PC-based tool. Interruption characteristics captured included duration, nature, location, and task priority. Trauma activations lasting more than five minutes were also recorded. Only interruptions occurring within one-hour of trauma activations were included in the analysis. Chi-square analyses identified significant associations between SEIPS-categorized interruptions and the interruption priority, p < 0.01, and between the SEIPS-categorized interruptions and the interruption location, p = 0.01, pre- and post-trauma activations. Identifying these associations revealed key opportunities to reduce unnecessary interruptions in the ED.

AB - Clinicians have anecdotally indicated that interruptions increase following trauma activations in the emergency department (ED), yet it is unknown whether interruptions change following the end of a trauma case. This study aimed to examine the interruption characteristics of clinicians that participate in trauma activations before and after activations using the SEIPS model. Observers shadowed ED clinicians across entire shifts and logged interruptions that affected clinicians in a tablet PC-based tool. Interruption characteristics captured included duration, nature, location, and task priority. Trauma activations lasting more than five minutes were also recorded. Only interruptions occurring within one-hour of trauma activations were included in the analysis. Chi-square analyses identified significant associations between SEIPS-categorized interruptions and the interruption priority, p < 0.01, and between the SEIPS-categorized interruptions and the interruption location, p = 0.01, pre- and post-trauma activations. Identifying these associations revealed key opportunities to reduce unnecessary interruptions in the ED.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042517514&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042517514&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1541931213601645

DO - 10.1177/1541931213601645

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:85042517514

VL - 2017-October

SP - 643

EP - 647

BT - Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2017 International Annual Meeting, HFES 2017

PB - Human Factors an Ergonomics Society Inc.

ER -