Do pre-existing complications affect the failure to rescue quality measures?

James P. Moriarty, D. M. Finnie, M. G. Johnson, J. M. Huddleston, James M Naessens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: A project sponsored by the University Health System Consortium has addressed the inaccuracy and high variability across institutions concerning the use of the failure to rescue (FTR) quality indicator defined by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Results indicated that of the complications identified by the quality indicator, 29.5% were pre-existing upon hospital admission. Objective: The purpose of our study was to investigate the possible bias to FTR measures by including cases of complications that were pre-existing at admission. Methods: Hospital discharges between 1 January 1996 and 30 September 2007 were retrospectively gathered from administrative databases. Using definitions outlined by the AHRQ and the National Quality Forum (NQF), FTR rates were calculated. Using present on admission coding, FTR rates were recalculated to differentiate between the rates of pre-existing and that of acquired cases. Results: Using the AHRQ definition, the overall FTR rate was 11.60%. The FTR rate for patients with pre-existing complications was 8.85%, whereas patients with complications acquired during hospitalisation had an FTR rate of 18.46% (p<0.001). The NQF FTR rate was 9.93%. Pre-existing and acquired FTR rates using the NQF measure were 9.42% and 12.77%, respectively (p<0.001). Conclusions: Current definitions of FTR measures meant to identify inhospital complications appear biased by the inclusion of problems at admission. Furthermore, many patients with these complications are excluded from the algorithms. When taking into account the timing of the " complications", these measures can be useful for internal quality control. However, it should be stressed that the usefulness of the measures to compare institutions will be dependent on coding practices of institutions. Validation using chart review may be required.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)65-68
Number of pages4
JournalQuality and Safety in Health Care
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2010

Fingerprint

Health Services Research
Quality Control
Hospitalization
Databases
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Do pre-existing complications affect the failure to rescue quality measures? / Moriarty, James P.; Finnie, D. M.; Johnson, M. G.; Huddleston, J. M.; Naessens, James M.

In: Quality and Safety in Health Care, Vol. 19, No. 1, 02.2010, p. 65-68.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Moriarty, James P. ; Finnie, D. M. ; Johnson, M. G. ; Huddleston, J. M. ; Naessens, James M. / Do pre-existing complications affect the failure to rescue quality measures?. In: Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2010 ; Vol. 19, No. 1. pp. 65-68.
@article{2b18f30711234074b87714738784f6e2,
title = "Do pre-existing complications affect the failure to rescue quality measures?",
abstract = "Background: A project sponsored by the University Health System Consortium has addressed the inaccuracy and high variability across institutions concerning the use of the failure to rescue (FTR) quality indicator defined by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Results indicated that of the complications identified by the quality indicator, 29.5{\%} were pre-existing upon hospital admission. Objective: The purpose of our study was to investigate the possible bias to FTR measures by including cases of complications that were pre-existing at admission. Methods: Hospital discharges between 1 January 1996 and 30 September 2007 were retrospectively gathered from administrative databases. Using definitions outlined by the AHRQ and the National Quality Forum (NQF), FTR rates were calculated. Using present on admission coding, FTR rates were recalculated to differentiate between the rates of pre-existing and that of acquired cases. Results: Using the AHRQ definition, the overall FTR rate was 11.60{\%}. The FTR rate for patients with pre-existing complications was 8.85{\%}, whereas patients with complications acquired during hospitalisation had an FTR rate of 18.46{\%} (p<0.001). The NQF FTR rate was 9.93{\%}. Pre-existing and acquired FTR rates using the NQF measure were 9.42{\%} and 12.77{\%}, respectively (p<0.001). Conclusions: Current definitions of FTR measures meant to identify inhospital complications appear biased by the inclusion of problems at admission. Furthermore, many patients with these complications are excluded from the algorithms. When taking into account the timing of the {"} complications{"}, these measures can be useful for internal quality control. However, it should be stressed that the usefulness of the measures to compare institutions will be dependent on coding practices of institutions. Validation using chart review may be required.",
author = "Moriarty, {James P.} and Finnie, {D. M.} and Johnson, {M. G.} and Huddleston, {J. M.} and Naessens, {James M}",
year = "2010",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1136/qshc.2007.025981",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "65--68",
journal = "BMJ Quality and Safety",
issn = "2044-5415",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do pre-existing complications affect the failure to rescue quality measures?

AU - Moriarty, James P.

AU - Finnie, D. M.

AU - Johnson, M. G.

AU - Huddleston, J. M.

AU - Naessens, James M

PY - 2010/2

Y1 - 2010/2

N2 - Background: A project sponsored by the University Health System Consortium has addressed the inaccuracy and high variability across institutions concerning the use of the failure to rescue (FTR) quality indicator defined by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Results indicated that of the complications identified by the quality indicator, 29.5% were pre-existing upon hospital admission. Objective: The purpose of our study was to investigate the possible bias to FTR measures by including cases of complications that were pre-existing at admission. Methods: Hospital discharges between 1 January 1996 and 30 September 2007 were retrospectively gathered from administrative databases. Using definitions outlined by the AHRQ and the National Quality Forum (NQF), FTR rates were calculated. Using present on admission coding, FTR rates were recalculated to differentiate between the rates of pre-existing and that of acquired cases. Results: Using the AHRQ definition, the overall FTR rate was 11.60%. The FTR rate for patients with pre-existing complications was 8.85%, whereas patients with complications acquired during hospitalisation had an FTR rate of 18.46% (p<0.001). The NQF FTR rate was 9.93%. Pre-existing and acquired FTR rates using the NQF measure were 9.42% and 12.77%, respectively (p<0.001). Conclusions: Current definitions of FTR measures meant to identify inhospital complications appear biased by the inclusion of problems at admission. Furthermore, many patients with these complications are excluded from the algorithms. When taking into account the timing of the " complications", these measures can be useful for internal quality control. However, it should be stressed that the usefulness of the measures to compare institutions will be dependent on coding practices of institutions. Validation using chart review may be required.

AB - Background: A project sponsored by the University Health System Consortium has addressed the inaccuracy and high variability across institutions concerning the use of the failure to rescue (FTR) quality indicator defined by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Results indicated that of the complications identified by the quality indicator, 29.5% were pre-existing upon hospital admission. Objective: The purpose of our study was to investigate the possible bias to FTR measures by including cases of complications that were pre-existing at admission. Methods: Hospital discharges between 1 January 1996 and 30 September 2007 were retrospectively gathered from administrative databases. Using definitions outlined by the AHRQ and the National Quality Forum (NQF), FTR rates were calculated. Using present on admission coding, FTR rates were recalculated to differentiate between the rates of pre-existing and that of acquired cases. Results: Using the AHRQ definition, the overall FTR rate was 11.60%. The FTR rate for patients with pre-existing complications was 8.85%, whereas patients with complications acquired during hospitalisation had an FTR rate of 18.46% (p<0.001). The NQF FTR rate was 9.93%. Pre-existing and acquired FTR rates using the NQF measure were 9.42% and 12.77%, respectively (p<0.001). Conclusions: Current definitions of FTR measures meant to identify inhospital complications appear biased by the inclusion of problems at admission. Furthermore, many patients with these complications are excluded from the algorithms. When taking into account the timing of the " complications", these measures can be useful for internal quality control. However, it should be stressed that the usefulness of the measures to compare institutions will be dependent on coding practices of institutions. Validation using chart review may be required.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77649119472&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77649119472&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/qshc.2007.025981

DO - 10.1136/qshc.2007.025981

M3 - Article

C2 - 20172886

AN - SCOPUS:77649119472

VL - 19

SP - 65

EP - 68

JO - BMJ Quality and Safety

JF - BMJ Quality and Safety

SN - 2044-5415

IS - 1

ER -