TY - JOUR
T1 - Do Magnet®-Designated Hospitals Perform Better on Medicare's Value-Based Purchasing Program?
AU - Spaulding, Aaron
AU - Hamadi, Hanadi
AU - Moody, La Ree
AU - Lentz, Luanne
AU - Liu, Xinliang Albert
AU - Wu, Yu Janet
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between a hospital's Magnet® recognition status, tenure, and its performance in the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (HVBP) program. BACKGROUND Previous studies have sought to determine associations between quality of care provided in inpatient setting and the Magnet Recognition Program®; however, no study has done so using the most recent (FY2017) iteration of the HVBP program, nor determined the influence a hospital's Magnet designation tenure has on HVBP scores. METHOD This study used a cross-sectional study design of 2686 hospitals using propensity score matching to reduce bias and improve comparability. RESULTS Magnet-designated hospitals were associated with higher total performance, process of care and patient experience of care scores, and lower efficiency score. No association was identified between the length of time hospitals have been Magnet designated. CONCLUSION Findings suggest non-Magnet status hospitals need to consider implementing the principles of Magnet into their culture or participation in the Magnet Recognition Program to provide higher quality of care.
AB - OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between a hospital's Magnet® recognition status, tenure, and its performance in the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (HVBP) program. BACKGROUND Previous studies have sought to determine associations between quality of care provided in inpatient setting and the Magnet Recognition Program®; however, no study has done so using the most recent (FY2017) iteration of the HVBP program, nor determined the influence a hospital's Magnet designation tenure has on HVBP scores. METHOD This study used a cross-sectional study design of 2686 hospitals using propensity score matching to reduce bias and improve comparability. RESULTS Magnet-designated hospitals were associated with higher total performance, process of care and patient experience of care scores, and lower efficiency score. No association was identified between the length of time hospitals have been Magnet designated. CONCLUSION Findings suggest non-Magnet status hospitals need to consider implementing the principles of Magnet into their culture or participation in the Magnet Recognition Program to provide higher quality of care.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088531194&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85088531194&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000906
DO - 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000906
M3 - Article
C2 - 32701644
AN - SCOPUS:85088531194
SN - 0002-0443
VL - 50
SP - 395
EP - 401
JO - Journal of Nursing Administration
JF - Journal of Nursing Administration
IS - 7-8
ER -