Distress and empathy do not drive changes in specialty preference among US medical students

Liselotte (Lotte) Dyrbye, Anne M. Eacker, William Harper, David V. Power, F. Stanford Massie, Daniel Satele, Matthew R. Thomas, Jeff A Sloan, Tait D. Shanafelt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Although medical student specialty choices shape the future of the healthcare workforce, factors influencing changes in specialty preference during training remain poorly understood. Aim: To explore if medical student distress and empathy predicts changes in students' specialty preference. Methods: A total of 858/1321 medical students attending five medical schools responded to surveys in 2006 and 2007. The survey included questions about specialty choice, burnout, depression, quality of life, and empathy. Results: A total of 26% (205/799) changed their specialty preference over 1 year. Depersonalization an aspect of burnout was the only distress variable associated with change in specialty preference (OR, odds ratio 0.962 for each 1-point increase in score, p=0.03). Empathy at baseline and changes in empathy over the course of 1 year did not predict change in specialty preference (all p>0.05). On multi-variable analysis, being a third year (OR 1.92), being male (OR 1.48), and depersonalization score (OR 0.962 for each point increase) independently predicted a change in specialty preference. Distress and empathy did not independently predict students' losing interest in primary care whereas being a fourth-year student (OR 1.83) and being female (OR 1.83) did. Conclusion: Among those who did have a major change in their specialty preference, distress and empathy did not play a major role.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalMedical Teacher
Volume34
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2012

Fingerprint

Medical Students
empathy
medical student
Depersonalization
depersonalization
Students
burnout
Medical Schools
student
Primary Health Care
Odds Ratio
Quality of Life
Medicine
quality of life
Depression
Delivery of Health Care
school

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Dyrbye, L. L., Eacker, A. M., Harper, W., Power, D. V., Massie, F. S., Satele, D., ... Shanafelt, T. D. (2012). Distress and empathy do not drive changes in specialty preference among US medical students. Medical Teacher, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.644830

Distress and empathy do not drive changes in specialty preference among US medical students. / Dyrbye, Liselotte (Lotte); Eacker, Anne M.; Harper, William; Power, David V.; Massie, F. Stanford; Satele, Daniel; Thomas, Matthew R.; Sloan, Jeff A; Shanafelt, Tait D.

In: Medical Teacher, Vol. 34, No. 2, 02.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dyrbye, LL, Eacker, AM, Harper, W, Power, DV, Massie, FS, Satele, D, Thomas, MR, Sloan, JA & Shanafelt, TD 2012, 'Distress and empathy do not drive changes in specialty preference among US medical students', Medical Teacher, vol. 34, no. 2. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.644830
Dyrbye, Liselotte (Lotte) ; Eacker, Anne M. ; Harper, William ; Power, David V. ; Massie, F. Stanford ; Satele, Daniel ; Thomas, Matthew R. ; Sloan, Jeff A ; Shanafelt, Tait D. / Distress and empathy do not drive changes in specialty preference among US medical students. In: Medical Teacher. 2012 ; Vol. 34, No. 2.
@article{323bf7a6444d44b78384ecf707bce7eb,
title = "Distress and empathy do not drive changes in specialty preference among US medical students",
abstract = "Background: Although medical student specialty choices shape the future of the healthcare workforce, factors influencing changes in specialty preference during training remain poorly understood. Aim: To explore if medical student distress and empathy predicts changes in students' specialty preference. Methods: A total of 858/1321 medical students attending five medical schools responded to surveys in 2006 and 2007. The survey included questions about specialty choice, burnout, depression, quality of life, and empathy. Results: A total of 26{\%} (205/799) changed their specialty preference over 1 year. Depersonalization an aspect of burnout was the only distress variable associated with change in specialty preference (OR, odds ratio 0.962 for each 1-point increase in score, p=0.03). Empathy at baseline and changes in empathy over the course of 1 year did not predict change in specialty preference (all p>0.05). On multi-variable analysis, being a third year (OR 1.92), being male (OR 1.48), and depersonalization score (OR 0.962 for each point increase) independently predicted a change in specialty preference. Distress and empathy did not independently predict students' losing interest in primary care whereas being a fourth-year student (OR 1.83) and being female (OR 1.83) did. Conclusion: Among those who did have a major change in their specialty preference, distress and empathy did not play a major role.",
author = "Dyrbye, {Liselotte (Lotte)} and Eacker, {Anne M.} and William Harper and Power, {David V.} and Massie, {F. Stanford} and Daniel Satele and Thomas, {Matthew R.} and Sloan, {Jeff A} and Shanafelt, {Tait D.}",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
doi = "10.3109/0142159X.2012.644830",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
journal = "Medical Teacher",
issn = "0142-159X",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Distress and empathy do not drive changes in specialty preference among US medical students

AU - Dyrbye, Liselotte (Lotte)

AU - Eacker, Anne M.

AU - Harper, William

AU - Power, David V.

AU - Massie, F. Stanford

AU - Satele, Daniel

AU - Thomas, Matthew R.

AU - Sloan, Jeff A

AU - Shanafelt, Tait D.

PY - 2012/2

Y1 - 2012/2

N2 - Background: Although medical student specialty choices shape the future of the healthcare workforce, factors influencing changes in specialty preference during training remain poorly understood. Aim: To explore if medical student distress and empathy predicts changes in students' specialty preference. Methods: A total of 858/1321 medical students attending five medical schools responded to surveys in 2006 and 2007. The survey included questions about specialty choice, burnout, depression, quality of life, and empathy. Results: A total of 26% (205/799) changed their specialty preference over 1 year. Depersonalization an aspect of burnout was the only distress variable associated with change in specialty preference (OR, odds ratio 0.962 for each 1-point increase in score, p=0.03). Empathy at baseline and changes in empathy over the course of 1 year did not predict change in specialty preference (all p>0.05). On multi-variable analysis, being a third year (OR 1.92), being male (OR 1.48), and depersonalization score (OR 0.962 for each point increase) independently predicted a change in specialty preference. Distress and empathy did not independently predict students' losing interest in primary care whereas being a fourth-year student (OR 1.83) and being female (OR 1.83) did. Conclusion: Among those who did have a major change in their specialty preference, distress and empathy did not play a major role.

AB - Background: Although medical student specialty choices shape the future of the healthcare workforce, factors influencing changes in specialty preference during training remain poorly understood. Aim: To explore if medical student distress and empathy predicts changes in students' specialty preference. Methods: A total of 858/1321 medical students attending five medical schools responded to surveys in 2006 and 2007. The survey included questions about specialty choice, burnout, depression, quality of life, and empathy. Results: A total of 26% (205/799) changed their specialty preference over 1 year. Depersonalization an aspect of burnout was the only distress variable associated with change in specialty preference (OR, odds ratio 0.962 for each 1-point increase in score, p=0.03). Empathy at baseline and changes in empathy over the course of 1 year did not predict change in specialty preference (all p>0.05). On multi-variable analysis, being a third year (OR 1.92), being male (OR 1.48), and depersonalization score (OR 0.962 for each point increase) independently predicted a change in specialty preference. Distress and empathy did not independently predict students' losing interest in primary care whereas being a fourth-year student (OR 1.83) and being female (OR 1.83) did. Conclusion: Among those who did have a major change in their specialty preference, distress and empathy did not play a major role.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863411294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863411294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/0142159X.2012.644830

DO - 10.3109/0142159X.2012.644830

M3 - Article

C2 - 22289009

AN - SCOPUS:84863411294

VL - 34

JO - Medical Teacher

JF - Medical Teacher

SN - 0142-159X

IS - 2

ER -