Distinction between neoplastic and radiation-induced brachial plexopathy, with emphasis on the role of EMG

C. M. Harper, J. E. Thomas, T. L. Cascino, William J Litchy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

126 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The results of clinical, radiologic, and electrophysiologic studies are retrospectively reviewed for 55 patients with neoplastic and 35 patients with radiation-induced brachial plexopathy. The presence or absence of pain as the presenting symptom, temporal profile of the illness, presence of a discrete mass on CT of the plexus, and presence of myokymic discharges on EMG contributed significantly to the prediction of the underlying cause of the brachial plexopathy. The distribution of weakness and the results of nerve conduction studies were of no help in distinguishing neoplastic from radiation-induced brachial plexopathy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)502-506
Number of pages5
JournalNeurology
Volume39
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1989

Fingerprint

Brachial Plexus Neuropathies
Neural Conduction
Pain
Radiation induced brachial plexopathy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Distinction between neoplastic and radiation-induced brachial plexopathy, with emphasis on the role of EMG. / Harper, C. M.; Thomas, J. E.; Cascino, T. L.; Litchy, William J.

In: Neurology, Vol. 39, No. 4, 1989, p. 502-506.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harper, C. M. ; Thomas, J. E. ; Cascino, T. L. ; Litchy, William J. / Distinction between neoplastic and radiation-induced brachial plexopathy, with emphasis on the role of EMG. In: Neurology. 1989 ; Vol. 39, No. 4. pp. 502-506.
@article{977b09b794c94c6fa4bdd7ea19764184,
title = "Distinction between neoplastic and radiation-induced brachial plexopathy, with emphasis on the role of EMG",
abstract = "The results of clinical, radiologic, and electrophysiologic studies are retrospectively reviewed for 55 patients with neoplastic and 35 patients with radiation-induced brachial plexopathy. The presence or absence of pain as the presenting symptom, temporal profile of the illness, presence of a discrete mass on CT of the plexus, and presence of myokymic discharges on EMG contributed significantly to the prediction of the underlying cause of the brachial plexopathy. The distribution of weakness and the results of nerve conduction studies were of no help in distinguishing neoplastic from radiation-induced brachial plexopathy.",
author = "Harper, {C. M.} and Thomas, {J. E.} and Cascino, {T. L.} and Litchy, {William J}",
year = "1989",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "502--506",
journal = "Neurology",
issn = "0028-3878",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Distinction between neoplastic and radiation-induced brachial plexopathy, with emphasis on the role of EMG

AU - Harper, C. M.

AU - Thomas, J. E.

AU - Cascino, T. L.

AU - Litchy, William J

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - The results of clinical, radiologic, and electrophysiologic studies are retrospectively reviewed for 55 patients with neoplastic and 35 patients with radiation-induced brachial plexopathy. The presence or absence of pain as the presenting symptom, temporal profile of the illness, presence of a discrete mass on CT of the plexus, and presence of myokymic discharges on EMG contributed significantly to the prediction of the underlying cause of the brachial plexopathy. The distribution of weakness and the results of nerve conduction studies were of no help in distinguishing neoplastic from radiation-induced brachial plexopathy.

AB - The results of clinical, radiologic, and electrophysiologic studies are retrospectively reviewed for 55 patients with neoplastic and 35 patients with radiation-induced brachial plexopathy. The presence or absence of pain as the presenting symptom, temporal profile of the illness, presence of a discrete mass on CT of the plexus, and presence of myokymic discharges on EMG contributed significantly to the prediction of the underlying cause of the brachial plexopathy. The distribution of weakness and the results of nerve conduction studies were of no help in distinguishing neoplastic from radiation-induced brachial plexopathy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024500562&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024500562&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 2538777

AN - SCOPUS:0024500562

VL - 39

SP - 502

EP - 506

JO - Neurology

JF - Neurology

SN - 0028-3878

IS - 4

ER -