Distance versus near visual acuity in amblyopia

Alex Christoff, Michael X. Repka, Brett M. Kaminski, Jonathan M Holmes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: There are conflicting reports about whether distance and near visual acuity are similar in eyes with amblyopia. The purpose of this study is to compare monocular distance visual acuity with near visual acuity in amblyopic eyes of children. Methods: Subjects 2 to 6 years of age were evaluated in a randomized trial of amblyopia therapy for moderate amblyopia (20/40 to 20/80) due to anisometropia, strabismus, or both. Prior to initiating the protocol-prescribed therapy, subjects had best-corrected visual acuity measured with standardized protocols at 3 meters and 0.4 meters using single-surrounded HOTV optotypes. Results: A total of 129 subjects were included. The mean amblyopic eye visual acuity was similar at distance and near (mean, 0.45 logMAR at distance versus 0.45 logMAR at near; mean difference, +0.00, 95% CI, -0.03 to 0.03). Of the 129 subjects, 86 (67%) tested within 1 line at distance and near; 19 (15%) tested more than 1 logMAR line better at distance, and 24 (19%) tested more than 1 logMAR line better at near. The mean visual acuity difference between distance and near did not differ by cause of amblyopia, age, or spherical equivalent refractive error. Conclusions: We found no systematic difference between distance and near visual acuity in 2- to 6-year-old children with moderate amblyopia associated with strabismus and/or anisometropia. Individual differences between distance and near visual acuity are likely due to test-retest variability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)342-344
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of AAPOS
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2011

Fingerprint

Amblyopia
Visual Acuity
Anisometropia
Strabismus
Refractive Errors
Individuality
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Distance versus near visual acuity in amblyopia. / Christoff, Alex; Repka, Michael X.; Kaminski, Brett M.; Holmes, Jonathan M.

In: Journal of AAPOS, Vol. 15, No. 4, 08.2011, p. 342-344.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Christoff, Alex ; Repka, Michael X. ; Kaminski, Brett M. ; Holmes, Jonathan M. / Distance versus near visual acuity in amblyopia. In: Journal of AAPOS. 2011 ; Vol. 15, No. 4. pp. 342-344.
@article{44236cf0505a43459ef28c4a9c81f817,
title = "Distance versus near visual acuity in amblyopia",
abstract = "Purpose: There are conflicting reports about whether distance and near visual acuity are similar in eyes with amblyopia. The purpose of this study is to compare monocular distance visual acuity with near visual acuity in amblyopic eyes of children. Methods: Subjects 2 to 6 years of age were evaluated in a randomized trial of amblyopia therapy for moderate amblyopia (20/40 to 20/80) due to anisometropia, strabismus, or both. Prior to initiating the protocol-prescribed therapy, subjects had best-corrected visual acuity measured with standardized protocols at 3 meters and 0.4 meters using single-surrounded HOTV optotypes. Results: A total of 129 subjects were included. The mean amblyopic eye visual acuity was similar at distance and near (mean, 0.45 logMAR at distance versus 0.45 logMAR at near; mean difference, +0.00, 95{\%} CI, -0.03 to 0.03). Of the 129 subjects, 86 (67{\%}) tested within 1 line at distance and near; 19 (15{\%}) tested more than 1 logMAR line better at distance, and 24 (19{\%}) tested more than 1 logMAR line better at near. The mean visual acuity difference between distance and near did not differ by cause of amblyopia, age, or spherical equivalent refractive error. Conclusions: We found no systematic difference between distance and near visual acuity in 2- to 6-year-old children with moderate amblyopia associated with strabismus and/or anisometropia. Individual differences between distance and near visual acuity are likely due to test-retest variability.",
author = "Alex Christoff and Repka, {Michael X.} and Kaminski, {Brett M.} and Holmes, {Jonathan M}",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.05.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "342--344",
journal = "Journal of AAPOS",
issn = "1091-8531",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Distance versus near visual acuity in amblyopia

AU - Christoff, Alex

AU - Repka, Michael X.

AU - Kaminski, Brett M.

AU - Holmes, Jonathan M

PY - 2011/8

Y1 - 2011/8

N2 - Purpose: There are conflicting reports about whether distance and near visual acuity are similar in eyes with amblyopia. The purpose of this study is to compare monocular distance visual acuity with near visual acuity in amblyopic eyes of children. Methods: Subjects 2 to 6 years of age were evaluated in a randomized trial of amblyopia therapy for moderate amblyopia (20/40 to 20/80) due to anisometropia, strabismus, or both. Prior to initiating the protocol-prescribed therapy, subjects had best-corrected visual acuity measured with standardized protocols at 3 meters and 0.4 meters using single-surrounded HOTV optotypes. Results: A total of 129 subjects were included. The mean amblyopic eye visual acuity was similar at distance and near (mean, 0.45 logMAR at distance versus 0.45 logMAR at near; mean difference, +0.00, 95% CI, -0.03 to 0.03). Of the 129 subjects, 86 (67%) tested within 1 line at distance and near; 19 (15%) tested more than 1 logMAR line better at distance, and 24 (19%) tested more than 1 logMAR line better at near. The mean visual acuity difference between distance and near did not differ by cause of amblyopia, age, or spherical equivalent refractive error. Conclusions: We found no systematic difference between distance and near visual acuity in 2- to 6-year-old children with moderate amblyopia associated with strabismus and/or anisometropia. Individual differences between distance and near visual acuity are likely due to test-retest variability.

AB - Purpose: There are conflicting reports about whether distance and near visual acuity are similar in eyes with amblyopia. The purpose of this study is to compare monocular distance visual acuity with near visual acuity in amblyopic eyes of children. Methods: Subjects 2 to 6 years of age were evaluated in a randomized trial of amblyopia therapy for moderate amblyopia (20/40 to 20/80) due to anisometropia, strabismus, or both. Prior to initiating the protocol-prescribed therapy, subjects had best-corrected visual acuity measured with standardized protocols at 3 meters and 0.4 meters using single-surrounded HOTV optotypes. Results: A total of 129 subjects were included. The mean amblyopic eye visual acuity was similar at distance and near (mean, 0.45 logMAR at distance versus 0.45 logMAR at near; mean difference, +0.00, 95% CI, -0.03 to 0.03). Of the 129 subjects, 86 (67%) tested within 1 line at distance and near; 19 (15%) tested more than 1 logMAR line better at distance, and 24 (19%) tested more than 1 logMAR line better at near. The mean visual acuity difference between distance and near did not differ by cause of amblyopia, age, or spherical equivalent refractive error. Conclusions: We found no systematic difference between distance and near visual acuity in 2- to 6-year-old children with moderate amblyopia associated with strabismus and/or anisometropia. Individual differences between distance and near visual acuity are likely due to test-retest variability.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052772251&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052772251&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.05.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.05.004

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 342

EP - 344

JO - Journal of AAPOS

JF - Journal of AAPOS

SN - 1091-8531

IS - 4

ER -