Discovery of cancer susceptibility genes: study designs, analytic approaches, and trends in technology.

Daniel J Schaid, K. Buetow, D. E. Weeks, E. Wijsman, S. W. Guo, J. Ott, C. Dahl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Determining the genetic causes of cancers has immense public health benefits, ranging from prevention to earlier detection and treatment of disease. Although a number of cancer susceptibility genes have been successfully identified, design and analytic issues remain that challenge the current paradigm of gene discovery. Some examples are the definition and measurement of cancer phenotype, the use of intermediate end points, the choice of sample (e.g., affected relative pairs versus large extended pedigrees), the choice of analytic method [e.g., parametric logarithm of the odds (LOD) score method versus model-free methods], and the influence of gene-environment interaction on linkage analysis. Furthermore, association methods, based on either the traditional case-control study design or family-based controls, are popular choices to evaluate candidate genes or screen for linkage disequilibrium. Finally, the study design and analytic methods for gene discovery are determined to some extent by what genomic technology is feasible within the laboratory. Many of the main issues related to gene discovery, as well as trends in genomic technology that will impact on gene discovery, are discussed from the perspective of their strengths and weaknesses, pointing to areas in need of further work.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs
Issue number26
StatePublished - 1999

Fingerprint

Neoplasm Genes
Genetic Association Studies
Technology
Gene-Environment Interaction
Linkage Disequilibrium
Insurance Benefits
Pedigree
Case-Control Studies
Early Diagnosis
Neoplasms
Public Health
Phenotype
Genes

Cite this

Discovery of cancer susceptibility genes : study designs, analytic approaches, and trends in technology. / Schaid, Daniel J; Buetow, K.; Weeks, D. E.; Wijsman, E.; Guo, S. W.; Ott, J.; Dahl, C.

In: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs, No. 26, 1999, p. 1-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{aa33417a3d384959ba33b52ce6ea74b7,
title = "Discovery of cancer susceptibility genes: study designs, analytic approaches, and trends in technology.",
abstract = "Determining the genetic causes of cancers has immense public health benefits, ranging from prevention to earlier detection and treatment of disease. Although a number of cancer susceptibility genes have been successfully identified, design and analytic issues remain that challenge the current paradigm of gene discovery. Some examples are the definition and measurement of cancer phenotype, the use of intermediate end points, the choice of sample (e.g., affected relative pairs versus large extended pedigrees), the choice of analytic method [e.g., parametric logarithm of the odds (LOD) score method versus model-free methods], and the influence of gene-environment interaction on linkage analysis. Furthermore, association methods, based on either the traditional case-control study design or family-based controls, are popular choices to evaluate candidate genes or screen for linkage disequilibrium. Finally, the study design and analytic methods for gene discovery are determined to some extent by what genomic technology is feasible within the laboratory. Many of the main issues related to gene discovery, as well as trends in genomic technology that will impact on gene discovery, are discussed from the perspective of their strengths and weaknesses, pointing to areas in need of further work.",
author = "Schaid, {Daniel J} and K. Buetow and Weeks, {D. E.} and E. Wijsman and Guo, {S. W.} and J. Ott and C. Dahl",
year = "1999",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--16",
journal = "NCI Monographs",
issn = "1052-6773",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "26",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Discovery of cancer susceptibility genes

T2 - study designs, analytic approaches, and trends in technology.

AU - Schaid, Daniel J

AU - Buetow, K.

AU - Weeks, D. E.

AU - Wijsman, E.

AU - Guo, S. W.

AU - Ott, J.

AU - Dahl, C.

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - Determining the genetic causes of cancers has immense public health benefits, ranging from prevention to earlier detection and treatment of disease. Although a number of cancer susceptibility genes have been successfully identified, design and analytic issues remain that challenge the current paradigm of gene discovery. Some examples are the definition and measurement of cancer phenotype, the use of intermediate end points, the choice of sample (e.g., affected relative pairs versus large extended pedigrees), the choice of analytic method [e.g., parametric logarithm of the odds (LOD) score method versus model-free methods], and the influence of gene-environment interaction on linkage analysis. Furthermore, association methods, based on either the traditional case-control study design or family-based controls, are popular choices to evaluate candidate genes or screen for linkage disequilibrium. Finally, the study design and analytic methods for gene discovery are determined to some extent by what genomic technology is feasible within the laboratory. Many of the main issues related to gene discovery, as well as trends in genomic technology that will impact on gene discovery, are discussed from the perspective of their strengths and weaknesses, pointing to areas in need of further work.

AB - Determining the genetic causes of cancers has immense public health benefits, ranging from prevention to earlier detection and treatment of disease. Although a number of cancer susceptibility genes have been successfully identified, design and analytic issues remain that challenge the current paradigm of gene discovery. Some examples are the definition and measurement of cancer phenotype, the use of intermediate end points, the choice of sample (e.g., affected relative pairs versus large extended pedigrees), the choice of analytic method [e.g., parametric logarithm of the odds (LOD) score method versus model-free methods], and the influence of gene-environment interaction on linkage analysis. Furthermore, association methods, based on either the traditional case-control study design or family-based controls, are popular choices to evaluate candidate genes or screen for linkage disequilibrium. Finally, the study design and analytic methods for gene discovery are determined to some extent by what genomic technology is feasible within the laboratory. Many of the main issues related to gene discovery, as well as trends in genomic technology that will impact on gene discovery, are discussed from the perspective of their strengths and weaknesses, pointing to areas in need of further work.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033287747&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033287747&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10854480

AN - SCOPUS:0033287747

SP - 1

EP - 16

JO - NCI Monographs

JF - NCI Monographs

SN - 1052-6773

IS - 26

ER -