Dignity in end-of-life care

Results of a national survey of U.S. physicians

Ryan M. Antiel, Farr A. Curlin, Katherine M. James, Daniel P. Sulmasy, Jon C Tilburt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context: Debates persist about the relevance of "dignity" as an ethical concept in U.S. health care, especially in end-of-life care. Objectives: To describe the attitudes and beliefs regarding the usefulness and meaning of the concept of dignity and to examine judgments about a clinical scenario in which dignity might be relevant. Methods: Two thousand practicing U.S. physicians, from all specialties, were mailed a survey. Main measures included physicians' judgments about an end-of-life clinical scenario (criterion variable), attitudes about the concept of dignity (predictors), and their religious characteristics (predictors). Results: Responses were received from 1032 eligible physicians (54%). Nine (90%) of 10 physicians reported that dignity was relevant to their practice. After controlling for age, gender, region, and specialty, physicians who judged that the case patient had either some dignity or full dignity, and who agreed that dignity is given by a creator, were all positively associated with believing that the patient's life was worth living (odds ratio [OR] 10.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.8-17.8, OR 20.5, 95% CI 11.4-36.8, OR 4.7, 95% CI 3.1-7.0, respectively). Respondents who strongly agreed that "all living humans have the same amount of dignity" were also more likely to believe that the patient's life was worth living (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.7). Religious characteristics also were associated with believing that the case patient's life was worth living (OR 4.1, 95% CI 2.4-7.2, OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.6-6.3, OR 9.2, 95% CI 4.3-19.5, respectively). Conclusion: U.S. physicians view the concept of dignity as useful. Those views are associated with their judgments about common end-of-life scenarios in which dignity concepts may be relevant.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)331-339
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Pain and Symptom Management
Volume44
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2012

Fingerprint

Terminal Care
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Physicians
Surveys and Questionnaires
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • end-of-life care
  • Human dignity
  • physician religiosity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Dignity in end-of-life care : Results of a national survey of U.S. physicians. / Antiel, Ryan M.; Curlin, Farr A.; James, Katherine M.; Sulmasy, Daniel P.; Tilburt, Jon C.

In: Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Vol. 44, No. 3, 09.2012, p. 331-339.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Antiel, Ryan M. ; Curlin, Farr A. ; James, Katherine M. ; Sulmasy, Daniel P. ; Tilburt, Jon C. / Dignity in end-of-life care : Results of a national survey of U.S. physicians. In: Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2012 ; Vol. 44, No. 3. pp. 331-339.
@article{38ea53c4adf2472f88da40d4e70f5c8e,
title = "Dignity in end-of-life care: Results of a national survey of U.S. physicians",
abstract = "Context: Debates persist about the relevance of {"}dignity{"} as an ethical concept in U.S. health care, especially in end-of-life care. Objectives: To describe the attitudes and beliefs regarding the usefulness and meaning of the concept of dignity and to examine judgments about a clinical scenario in which dignity might be relevant. Methods: Two thousand practicing U.S. physicians, from all specialties, were mailed a survey. Main measures included physicians' judgments about an end-of-life clinical scenario (criterion variable), attitudes about the concept of dignity (predictors), and their religious characteristics (predictors). Results: Responses were received from 1032 eligible physicians (54{\%}). Nine (90{\%}) of 10 physicians reported that dignity was relevant to their practice. After controlling for age, gender, region, and specialty, physicians who judged that the case patient had either some dignity or full dignity, and who agreed that dignity is given by a creator, were all positively associated with believing that the patient's life was worth living (odds ratio [OR] 10.2, 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] 5.8-17.8, OR 20.5, 95{\%} CI 11.4-36.8, OR 4.7, 95{\%} CI 3.1-7.0, respectively). Respondents who strongly agreed that {"}all living humans have the same amount of dignity{"} were also more likely to believe that the patient's life was worth living (OR 1.8, 95{\%} CI 1.2-2.7). Religious characteristics also were associated with believing that the case patient's life was worth living (OR 4.1, 95{\%} CI 2.4-7.2, OR 3.2, 95{\%} CI 1.6-6.3, OR 9.2, 95{\%} CI 4.3-19.5, respectively). Conclusion: U.S. physicians view the concept of dignity as useful. Those views are associated with their judgments about common end-of-life scenarios in which dignity concepts may be relevant.",
keywords = "end-of-life care, Human dignity, physician religiosity",
author = "Antiel, {Ryan M.} and Curlin, {Farr A.} and James, {Katherine M.} and Sulmasy, {Daniel P.} and Tilburt, {Jon C}",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.09.020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "331--339",
journal = "Journal of Pain and Symptom Management",
issn = "0885-3924",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dignity in end-of-life care

T2 - Results of a national survey of U.S. physicians

AU - Antiel, Ryan M.

AU - Curlin, Farr A.

AU - James, Katherine M.

AU - Sulmasy, Daniel P.

AU - Tilburt, Jon C

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - Context: Debates persist about the relevance of "dignity" as an ethical concept in U.S. health care, especially in end-of-life care. Objectives: To describe the attitudes and beliefs regarding the usefulness and meaning of the concept of dignity and to examine judgments about a clinical scenario in which dignity might be relevant. Methods: Two thousand practicing U.S. physicians, from all specialties, were mailed a survey. Main measures included physicians' judgments about an end-of-life clinical scenario (criterion variable), attitudes about the concept of dignity (predictors), and their religious characteristics (predictors). Results: Responses were received from 1032 eligible physicians (54%). Nine (90%) of 10 physicians reported that dignity was relevant to their practice. After controlling for age, gender, region, and specialty, physicians who judged that the case patient had either some dignity or full dignity, and who agreed that dignity is given by a creator, were all positively associated with believing that the patient's life was worth living (odds ratio [OR] 10.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.8-17.8, OR 20.5, 95% CI 11.4-36.8, OR 4.7, 95% CI 3.1-7.0, respectively). Respondents who strongly agreed that "all living humans have the same amount of dignity" were also more likely to believe that the patient's life was worth living (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.7). Religious characteristics also were associated with believing that the case patient's life was worth living (OR 4.1, 95% CI 2.4-7.2, OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.6-6.3, OR 9.2, 95% CI 4.3-19.5, respectively). Conclusion: U.S. physicians view the concept of dignity as useful. Those views are associated with their judgments about common end-of-life scenarios in which dignity concepts may be relevant.

AB - Context: Debates persist about the relevance of "dignity" as an ethical concept in U.S. health care, especially in end-of-life care. Objectives: To describe the attitudes and beliefs regarding the usefulness and meaning of the concept of dignity and to examine judgments about a clinical scenario in which dignity might be relevant. Methods: Two thousand practicing U.S. physicians, from all specialties, were mailed a survey. Main measures included physicians' judgments about an end-of-life clinical scenario (criterion variable), attitudes about the concept of dignity (predictors), and their religious characteristics (predictors). Results: Responses were received from 1032 eligible physicians (54%). Nine (90%) of 10 physicians reported that dignity was relevant to their practice. After controlling for age, gender, region, and specialty, physicians who judged that the case patient had either some dignity or full dignity, and who agreed that dignity is given by a creator, were all positively associated with believing that the patient's life was worth living (odds ratio [OR] 10.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.8-17.8, OR 20.5, 95% CI 11.4-36.8, OR 4.7, 95% CI 3.1-7.0, respectively). Respondents who strongly agreed that "all living humans have the same amount of dignity" were also more likely to believe that the patient's life was worth living (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.7). Religious characteristics also were associated with believing that the case patient's life was worth living (OR 4.1, 95% CI 2.4-7.2, OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.6-6.3, OR 9.2, 95% CI 4.3-19.5, respectively). Conclusion: U.S. physicians view the concept of dignity as useful. Those views are associated with their judgments about common end-of-life scenarios in which dignity concepts may be relevant.

KW - end-of-life care

KW - Human dignity

KW - physician religiosity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865689544&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865689544&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.09.020

DO - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.09.020

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 331

EP - 339

JO - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

JF - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

SN - 0885-3924

IS - 3

ER -