Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging

Elizabeth S. Burnside, Timothy J. Hall, Amy M. Sommer, Gina K. Hesley, Gale A. Sisney, William E. Svensson, Jason P. Fine, Jinfeng Jiang, Nicholas J. Hangiandreou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

237 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To prospectively evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonographic (US) strain imaging for distinguishing between benign and malignant solid breast masses, with biopsy results as the reference standard. Materials and Methods: The study was institutional review board approved and HIPAA compliant. Informed consent was obtained from all participating patients. US strain imaging of 403 breast masses was performed. The 50 malignant and 48 benign lesions (in patients aged 19-83 years; mean age, 49 years ± 17 [standard deviation]) with the highest quality were selected for the reader study. Three observers blinded to the pathologic outcomes first described the B-mode image findings by using US Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System descriptors and derived a probability of malignancy. They then updated the probability by assessing strain images. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed by using these probabilities. Areas under the ROC curve, sensitivities, and specificities were calculated and compared. Interobserver variability and the correlation between automated and subjective image quality assessment were analyzed. Results: The average area under the ROC curve for all three readers after US strain imaging (0.903) was greater than that after B-mode US alone (0.876, P = .014). With use of a 2% probability of malignancy threshold, strain imaging - as compared with B-mode US alone - had improved average specificity (0.257 vs 0.132, P < .001) and high sensitivity (0.993 vs 0.987, P > .99). Significant interobserver variability was observed (P < .001). The ability to assess strain image quality appeared to correlate with the highest observer performance. Conclusion: US strain imaging can facilitate improved classification of benign and malignant breast masses. However, interobserver variability and image quality influence observer performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)401-410
Number of pages10
JournalRadiology
Volume245
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2007

Fingerprint

Observer Variation
Breast
ROC Curve
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
Sensitivity and Specificity
Research Ethics Committees
Informed Consent
Information Systems
Neoplasms
Biopsy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Burnside, E. S., Hall, T. J., Sommer, A. M., Hesley, G. K., Sisney, G. A., Svensson, W. E., ... Hangiandreou, N. J. (2007). Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging. Radiology, 245(2), 401-410. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2452061805

Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging. / Burnside, Elizabeth S.; Hall, Timothy J.; Sommer, Amy M.; Hesley, Gina K.; Sisney, Gale A.; Svensson, William E.; Fine, Jason P.; Jiang, Jinfeng; Hangiandreou, Nicholas J.

In: Radiology, Vol. 245, No. 2, 11.2007, p. 401-410.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Burnside, ES, Hall, TJ, Sommer, AM, Hesley, GK, Sisney, GA, Svensson, WE, Fine, JP, Jiang, J & Hangiandreou, NJ 2007, 'Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging', Radiology, vol. 245, no. 2, pp. 401-410. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2452061805
Burnside ES, Hall TJ, Sommer AM, Hesley GK, Sisney GA, Svensson WE et al. Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging. Radiology. 2007 Nov;245(2):401-410. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2452061805
Burnside, Elizabeth S. ; Hall, Timothy J. ; Sommer, Amy M. ; Hesley, Gina K. ; Sisney, Gale A. ; Svensson, William E. ; Fine, Jason P. ; Jiang, Jinfeng ; Hangiandreou, Nicholas J. / Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging. In: Radiology. 2007 ; Vol. 245, No. 2. pp. 401-410.
@article{cf2fa2ba42644716b5ee6372fd690e60,
title = "Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging",
abstract = "Purpose: To prospectively evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonographic (US) strain imaging for distinguishing between benign and malignant solid breast masses, with biopsy results as the reference standard. Materials and Methods: The study was institutional review board approved and HIPAA compliant. Informed consent was obtained from all participating patients. US strain imaging of 403 breast masses was performed. The 50 malignant and 48 benign lesions (in patients aged 19-83 years; mean age, 49 years ± 17 [standard deviation]) with the highest quality were selected for the reader study. Three observers blinded to the pathologic outcomes first described the B-mode image findings by using US Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System descriptors and derived a probability of malignancy. They then updated the probability by assessing strain images. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed by using these probabilities. Areas under the ROC curve, sensitivities, and specificities were calculated and compared. Interobserver variability and the correlation between automated and subjective image quality assessment were analyzed. Results: The average area under the ROC curve for all three readers after US strain imaging (0.903) was greater than that after B-mode US alone (0.876, P = .014). With use of a 2{\%} probability of malignancy threshold, strain imaging - as compared with B-mode US alone - had improved average specificity (0.257 vs 0.132, P < .001) and high sensitivity (0.993 vs 0.987, P > .99). Significant interobserver variability was observed (P < .001). The ability to assess strain image quality appeared to correlate with the highest observer performance. Conclusion: US strain imaging can facilitate improved classification of benign and malignant breast masses. However, interobserver variability and image quality influence observer performance.",
author = "Burnside, {Elizabeth S.} and Hall, {Timothy J.} and Sommer, {Amy M.} and Hesley, {Gina K.} and Sisney, {Gale A.} and Svensson, {William E.} and Fine, {Jason P.} and Jinfeng Jiang and Hangiandreou, {Nicholas J.}",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1148/radiol.2452061805",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "245",
pages = "401--410",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging

AU - Burnside, Elizabeth S.

AU - Hall, Timothy J.

AU - Sommer, Amy M.

AU - Hesley, Gina K.

AU - Sisney, Gale A.

AU - Svensson, William E.

AU - Fine, Jason P.

AU - Jiang, Jinfeng

AU - Hangiandreou, Nicholas J.

PY - 2007/11

Y1 - 2007/11

N2 - Purpose: To prospectively evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonographic (US) strain imaging for distinguishing between benign and malignant solid breast masses, with biopsy results as the reference standard. Materials and Methods: The study was institutional review board approved and HIPAA compliant. Informed consent was obtained from all participating patients. US strain imaging of 403 breast masses was performed. The 50 malignant and 48 benign lesions (in patients aged 19-83 years; mean age, 49 years ± 17 [standard deviation]) with the highest quality were selected for the reader study. Three observers blinded to the pathologic outcomes first described the B-mode image findings by using US Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System descriptors and derived a probability of malignancy. They then updated the probability by assessing strain images. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed by using these probabilities. Areas under the ROC curve, sensitivities, and specificities were calculated and compared. Interobserver variability and the correlation between automated and subjective image quality assessment were analyzed. Results: The average area under the ROC curve for all three readers after US strain imaging (0.903) was greater than that after B-mode US alone (0.876, P = .014). With use of a 2% probability of malignancy threshold, strain imaging - as compared with B-mode US alone - had improved average specificity (0.257 vs 0.132, P < .001) and high sensitivity (0.993 vs 0.987, P > .99). Significant interobserver variability was observed (P < .001). The ability to assess strain image quality appeared to correlate with the highest observer performance. Conclusion: US strain imaging can facilitate improved classification of benign and malignant breast masses. However, interobserver variability and image quality influence observer performance.

AB - Purpose: To prospectively evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonographic (US) strain imaging for distinguishing between benign and malignant solid breast masses, with biopsy results as the reference standard. Materials and Methods: The study was institutional review board approved and HIPAA compliant. Informed consent was obtained from all participating patients. US strain imaging of 403 breast masses was performed. The 50 malignant and 48 benign lesions (in patients aged 19-83 years; mean age, 49 years ± 17 [standard deviation]) with the highest quality were selected for the reader study. Three observers blinded to the pathologic outcomes first described the B-mode image findings by using US Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System descriptors and derived a probability of malignancy. They then updated the probability by assessing strain images. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed by using these probabilities. Areas under the ROC curve, sensitivities, and specificities were calculated and compared. Interobserver variability and the correlation between automated and subjective image quality assessment were analyzed. Results: The average area under the ROC curve for all three readers after US strain imaging (0.903) was greater than that after B-mode US alone (0.876, P = .014). With use of a 2% probability of malignancy threshold, strain imaging - as compared with B-mode US alone - had improved average specificity (0.257 vs 0.132, P < .001) and high sensitivity (0.993 vs 0.987, P > .99). Significant interobserver variability was observed (P < .001). The ability to assess strain image quality appeared to correlate with the highest observer performance. Conclusion: US strain imaging can facilitate improved classification of benign and malignant breast masses. However, interobserver variability and image quality influence observer performance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35349031710&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35349031710&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1148/radiol.2452061805

DO - 10.1148/radiol.2452061805

M3 - Article

VL - 245

SP - 401

EP - 410

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 2

ER -