Differential Toxicity of Nuclear RNA Foci versus Dipeptide Repeat Proteins in a Drosophila Model of C9ORF72 FTD/ALS

Helene Tran, Sandra Almeida, Jill Moore, Tania F. Gendron, Uma Devi Chalasani, Yubing Lu, Xing Du, Jeffrey A. Nickerson, Leonard Petrucelli, Zhiping Weng, Fen Biao Gao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

123 Scopus citations

Abstract

Dipeptide repeat (DPR) proteins are toxic in various models of FTD/ALS with GGGGCC (G4C2) repeat expansion. However, it is unclear whether nuclear G4C2 RNA foci also induce neurotoxicity. Here, we describe a Drosophila model expressing 160 G4C2 repeats (160R) flanked by human intronic and exonic sequences. Spliced intronic 160R formed nuclear G4C2 sense RNA foci in glia and neurons about ten times more abundantly than in human neurons; however, they had little effect on global RNA processing and neuronal survival. In contrast, highly toxic 36R in the context of poly(A)+ mRNA were exported to the cytoplasm, where DPR proteins were produced at >100-fold higher level than in 160R flies. Moreover, the modest toxicity of intronic 160R expressed at higher temperature correlated with increased DPR production, but not RNA foci. Thus, nuclear RNA foci are neutral intermediates or possibly neuroprotective through preventing G4C2 RNA export and subsequent DPR production. Tran et al. engineered a novel Drosophila model of FTD/ALS with C9ORF72 repeat expansion and revealed that dipeptide repeat proteins, but not nuclear G4C2 repeat RNA foci, are a major source of toxicity in vivo.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1207-1214
Number of pages8
JournalNeuron
Volume87
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 23 2015

Keywords

  • ALS
  • C9ORF72
  • DPR
  • Drosophila
  • FTD
  • RNA foci
  • Ran translation
  • Repeats

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Neuroscience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Differential Toxicity of Nuclear RNA Foci versus Dipeptide Repeat Proteins in a Drosophila Model of C9ORF72 FTD/ALS'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this