TY - JOUR
T1 - Differential Response to Olaparib Treatment Among Men with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Harboring BRCA1 or BRCA2 Versus ATM Mutations
AU - Marshall, Catherine H.
AU - Sokolova, Alexandra O.
AU - McNatty, Andrea L.
AU - Cheng, Heather H.
AU - Eisenberger, Mario A.
AU - Bryce, Alan H.
AU - Schweizer, Michael T.
AU - Antonarakis, Emmanuel S.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding/Support and role of the sponsor: This work was partly supported by National Institutes of Health Cancer Center Support Grants P30 CA006973 and P30 CA015704, Pacific Northwest Prostate Cancer SPORE CA097186, Department of Defense grant W81XWH-16-PCRP-CCRSA, the Patrick C. Walsh Research Fund, and Institute for Prostate Cancer Research and Prostate Cancer Foundation Awards. The sponsors played no direct role in the study.
Funding Information:
Funding/Support and role of the sponsor: This work was partly supported by National Institutes of Health Cancer Center Support Grants P30 CA006973 and P30 CA015704 , Pacific Northwest Prostate Cancer SPORE CA097186 , Department of Defense grant W81XWH-16-PCRP-CCRSA , the Patrick C. Walsh Research Fund , and Institute for Prostate Cancer Research and Prostate Cancer Foundation Awards . The sponsors played no direct role in the study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 European Association of Urology
PY - 2019/10
Y1 - 2019/10
N2 - Background: Poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, such as olaparib, are being explored as a treatment option for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in men harboring mutations in homologous recombination DNA-repair genes. Whether responses to PARP inhibitors differ according to the affected gene is currently unknown. Objective: To determine whether responses to PARP inhibitors differ between men with BRCA1/2 and those with ATM mutations. Design, setting, and participants: This was a multicenter retrospective review of 23 consecutive men with mCRPC and pathogenic germline and/or somatic BRCA1/2 or ATM mutations treated with olaparib at three academic sites in the USA. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The proportion of patients achieving a ≥50% decline in prostate-specific antigen (PSA50 response) was compared using Fisher's exact test. Clinical and radiographic progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analyses and compared using the log-rank test. Results and limitations: The study included two men with BRCA1 mutations, 15 with BRCA2 mutations, and six with ATM mutations. PSA50 responses to olaparib were achieved in 76% (13/17) of men with BRCA1/2 versus 0% (0/6) of men with ATM mutations (Fisher's exact test; p = 0.002). Patients with BRCA1/2 mutations had median PFS of 12.3 mo versus 2.4 mo for those with ATM mutations (hazard ratio 0.17, 95% confidence interval 0.05–0.57; p = 0.004). Limitations include the retrospective design and relatively small sample size. Conclusions: Men with mCRPC harboring ATM mutations experienced inferior outcomes to PARP inhibitor therapy compared to those harboring BRCA1/2 mutations. Alternative therapies should be explored for patients with ATM mutations. Patient summary: Mutations in BRCA1/2 and ATM genes are common in metastatic prostate cancer. In this study we compared outcomes for men with BRCA1/2 mutations to those for men with ATM mutations being treated with olaparib. We found that men with ATM mutations do not respond as well as men with BRCA1/2 mutations.
AB - Background: Poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, such as olaparib, are being explored as a treatment option for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in men harboring mutations in homologous recombination DNA-repair genes. Whether responses to PARP inhibitors differ according to the affected gene is currently unknown. Objective: To determine whether responses to PARP inhibitors differ between men with BRCA1/2 and those with ATM mutations. Design, setting, and participants: This was a multicenter retrospective review of 23 consecutive men with mCRPC and pathogenic germline and/or somatic BRCA1/2 or ATM mutations treated with olaparib at three academic sites in the USA. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The proportion of patients achieving a ≥50% decline in prostate-specific antigen (PSA50 response) was compared using Fisher's exact test. Clinical and radiographic progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analyses and compared using the log-rank test. Results and limitations: The study included two men with BRCA1 mutations, 15 with BRCA2 mutations, and six with ATM mutations. PSA50 responses to olaparib were achieved in 76% (13/17) of men with BRCA1/2 versus 0% (0/6) of men with ATM mutations (Fisher's exact test; p = 0.002). Patients with BRCA1/2 mutations had median PFS of 12.3 mo versus 2.4 mo for those with ATM mutations (hazard ratio 0.17, 95% confidence interval 0.05–0.57; p = 0.004). Limitations include the retrospective design and relatively small sample size. Conclusions: Men with mCRPC harboring ATM mutations experienced inferior outcomes to PARP inhibitor therapy compared to those harboring BRCA1/2 mutations. Alternative therapies should be explored for patients with ATM mutations. Patient summary: Mutations in BRCA1/2 and ATM genes are common in metastatic prostate cancer. In this study we compared outcomes for men with BRCA1/2 mutations to those for men with ATM mutations being treated with olaparib. We found that men with ATM mutations do not respond as well as men with BRCA1/2 mutations.
KW - ATM
KW - BRCA2
KW - Olaparib
KW - PARP inhibitor
KW - Prostate cancer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061742386&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061742386&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.002
DO - 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 30797618
AN - SCOPUS:85061742386
SN - 0302-2838
VL - 76
SP - 452
EP - 458
JO - European Urology
JF - European Urology
IS - 4
ER -