Differential protective effects of volatile anesthetics against renal ischemia-reperfusion injury in vivo

H. Thomas Lee, Ayuko Ota-Setlik, Yulei Fu, Samih H. Nasr, Charles W. Emala

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

171 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Volatile anesthetics protect against cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury via adenosine triphosphate-dependent potassium channel activation. The authors questioned whether volatile anesthetics can also protect against renal ischemia-reperfusion injury and, if so, whether cellular adenosine triphosphate-dependent potassium channels, antiinflammatory effects of volatile anesthetics, or both are involved. Methods: Rats were anesthetized with equipotent doses of volatile anesthetics (desflurane, halothane, isoflurane, or sevoflurane) or injectable anesthetics (pentobarbital or ketamine) and subjected to 45 min of renal ischemia and 3 h of reperfusion during anesthesia. Results: Rats treated with volatile anesthetics had lower plasma creatinine and reduced renal necrosis 24-72 h after injury compared with rats anesthetized with pentobarbital or ketamine. Twenty-four hours after injury, sevoflurane-, isoflurane-, or halothane-treated rats had creatinine (± SD) of 2.3 ± 0.7 mg/dl (n = 12), 1.8 ± 0.5 mg/dl (n = 6), and 2.4 ± 1.2 mg/dl (n = 6), respectively, compared with rats treated with pentobarbital (5.8 ± 1.2 mg/dl, n = 9) or ketamine (4.6 ± 1.2 mg/dl, n = 8). Among the volatile anesthetics, desflurane demonstrated the least reduction in plasma creatinine after 24 h (4.1 ± 0.8 mg/dl, n = 12). Renal cortices from volatile anesthetic-treated rats demonstrated reduced expression of intercellular adhesion molecule 1 protein and messenger RNA as well as messenger RNAs encoding proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines. Volatile anesthetic treatment reduced renal cortex myeloperoxidase activity and reduced nuclear translocation of proinflammatory nuclear factor κB. Adenosine triphosphate-dependent potassium channels are not involved in sevoflurane-mediated renal protection because glibenclamide did not block renal protection (creatinine: 2.4 ± 0.4 mg/dl, n = 3). Conclusion: Some volatile anesthetics confer profound protection against renal ischemia-reperfusion injury compared with pentobarbital or ketamine anesthesia by attenuating inflammation. These findings may have significant clinical implications for anesthesiologists regarding the choice of volatile anesthetic agents in patients subjected to perioperative renal ischemia.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1313-1324
Number of pages12
JournalAnesthesiology
Volume101
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2004

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Differential protective effects of volatile anesthetics against renal ischemia-reperfusion injury in vivo'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this