Dietary fat and risk of breast cancer according to hormone receptor status

L. H. Kushi, J. D. Potter, R. M. Bostick, C. R. Drinkard, T. A. Sellers, S. M. Gapstur, J. R. Cerhan, James R Cerhan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

70 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The association of dietary fat with breast cancer in prospective cohort studies has generally been weak and not statistically significant. However, these studies have not considered whether the risk related to fat intake may differ according to estrogen or progesterone receptor status. Dietary habits and other breast cancer risk factors were assessed by mailed questionnaire in January 1986 in 34,388 postmenopausal Iowa women. Through 1991, 724 incident breast cancer cases were ascertained in this cohort using the Iowa cancer registry. Joint estrogen and progesterone receptor status was determined for 479 (66%) breast cancers. For tumors that were positive for both estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER+/PR+) (n = 329), age- and energy-adjusted relative risks for breast cancer adjusted from lowest to highest third of fat intake were 1.0, 1.05, and 1.22 (P trend = 0.14). Corresponding risks for ER+/PR- tumors (n = 75) were 1.0, 0.85, and 1.05 (P trend = 0.86) and for ER-/PR- tumors (n = 61) were 1.0, 1.06, and 0.73 (P trend = 0.68). Only 14 cases were classified as having ER-/PR+ tumors. Adjustment for other breast cancer risk factors did not appreciably alter these findings. There was a suggestion that dietary fat may be associated with ER+/PR+ breast cancers and not other breast cancers. These results are also consistent with an interpretation of no association between dietary fat with breast cancer, regardless of hormone receptor status. It has been suggested that etiological studies of breast cancer should investigate associations according to receptor status. This study provides evidence of a subset of breast cancers that may be related to dietary factors. Similar analyses in other studies would provide information as to whether the associations suggested here are etiologyically important or represent random fluctuations in the patterns of disease occurence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)11-19
Number of pages9
JournalCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention
Volume4
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dietary Fats
Hormones
Breast Neoplasms
Progesterone Receptors
Estrogen Receptors
Neoplasms
Fats
Feeding Behavior
Registries
Cohort Studies
Joints
Prospective Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Oncology

Cite this

Kushi, L. H., Potter, J. D., Bostick, R. M., Drinkard, C. R., Sellers, T. A., Gapstur, S. M., ... Cerhan, J. R. (1995). Dietary fat and risk of breast cancer according to hormone receptor status. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, 4(1), 11-19.

Dietary fat and risk of breast cancer according to hormone receptor status. / Kushi, L. H.; Potter, J. D.; Bostick, R. M.; Drinkard, C. R.; Sellers, T. A.; Gapstur, S. M.; Cerhan, J. R.; Cerhan, James R.

In: Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1995, p. 11-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kushi, LH, Potter, JD, Bostick, RM, Drinkard, CR, Sellers, TA, Gapstur, SM, Cerhan, JR & Cerhan, JR 1995, 'Dietary fat and risk of breast cancer according to hormone receptor status', Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 11-19.
Kushi LH, Potter JD, Bostick RM, Drinkard CR, Sellers TA, Gapstur SM et al. Dietary fat and risk of breast cancer according to hormone receptor status. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention. 1995;4(1):11-19.
Kushi, L. H. ; Potter, J. D. ; Bostick, R. M. ; Drinkard, C. R. ; Sellers, T. A. ; Gapstur, S. M. ; Cerhan, J. R. ; Cerhan, James R. / Dietary fat and risk of breast cancer according to hormone receptor status. In: Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention. 1995 ; Vol. 4, No. 1. pp. 11-19.
@article{0f1a2e91d476472ea165916793ba8f7f,
title = "Dietary fat and risk of breast cancer according to hormone receptor status",
abstract = "The association of dietary fat with breast cancer in prospective cohort studies has generally been weak and not statistically significant. However, these studies have not considered whether the risk related to fat intake may differ according to estrogen or progesterone receptor status. Dietary habits and other breast cancer risk factors were assessed by mailed questionnaire in January 1986 in 34,388 postmenopausal Iowa women. Through 1991, 724 incident breast cancer cases were ascertained in this cohort using the Iowa cancer registry. Joint estrogen and progesterone receptor status was determined for 479 (66{\%}) breast cancers. For tumors that were positive for both estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER+/PR+) (n = 329), age- and energy-adjusted relative risks for breast cancer adjusted from lowest to highest third of fat intake were 1.0, 1.05, and 1.22 (P trend = 0.14). Corresponding risks for ER+/PR- tumors (n = 75) were 1.0, 0.85, and 1.05 (P trend = 0.86) and for ER-/PR- tumors (n = 61) were 1.0, 1.06, and 0.73 (P trend = 0.68). Only 14 cases were classified as having ER-/PR+ tumors. Adjustment for other breast cancer risk factors did not appreciably alter these findings. There was a suggestion that dietary fat may be associated with ER+/PR+ breast cancers and not other breast cancers. These results are also consistent with an interpretation of no association between dietary fat with breast cancer, regardless of hormone receptor status. It has been suggested that etiological studies of breast cancer should investigate associations according to receptor status. This study provides evidence of a subset of breast cancers that may be related to dietary factors. Similar analyses in other studies would provide information as to whether the associations suggested here are etiologyically important or represent random fluctuations in the patterns of disease occurence.",
author = "Kushi, {L. H.} and Potter, {J. D.} and Bostick, {R. M.} and Drinkard, {C. R.} and Sellers, {T. A.} and Gapstur, {S. M.} and Cerhan, {J. R.} and Cerhan, {James R}",
year = "1995",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "11--19",
journal = "Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention",
issn = "1055-9965",
publisher = "American Association for Cancer Research Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dietary fat and risk of breast cancer according to hormone receptor status

AU - Kushi, L. H.

AU - Potter, J. D.

AU - Bostick, R. M.

AU - Drinkard, C. R.

AU - Sellers, T. A.

AU - Gapstur, S. M.

AU - Cerhan, J. R.

AU - Cerhan, James R

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - The association of dietary fat with breast cancer in prospective cohort studies has generally been weak and not statistically significant. However, these studies have not considered whether the risk related to fat intake may differ according to estrogen or progesterone receptor status. Dietary habits and other breast cancer risk factors were assessed by mailed questionnaire in January 1986 in 34,388 postmenopausal Iowa women. Through 1991, 724 incident breast cancer cases were ascertained in this cohort using the Iowa cancer registry. Joint estrogen and progesterone receptor status was determined for 479 (66%) breast cancers. For tumors that were positive for both estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER+/PR+) (n = 329), age- and energy-adjusted relative risks for breast cancer adjusted from lowest to highest third of fat intake were 1.0, 1.05, and 1.22 (P trend = 0.14). Corresponding risks for ER+/PR- tumors (n = 75) were 1.0, 0.85, and 1.05 (P trend = 0.86) and for ER-/PR- tumors (n = 61) were 1.0, 1.06, and 0.73 (P trend = 0.68). Only 14 cases were classified as having ER-/PR+ tumors. Adjustment for other breast cancer risk factors did not appreciably alter these findings. There was a suggestion that dietary fat may be associated with ER+/PR+ breast cancers and not other breast cancers. These results are also consistent with an interpretation of no association between dietary fat with breast cancer, regardless of hormone receptor status. It has been suggested that etiological studies of breast cancer should investigate associations according to receptor status. This study provides evidence of a subset of breast cancers that may be related to dietary factors. Similar analyses in other studies would provide information as to whether the associations suggested here are etiologyically important or represent random fluctuations in the patterns of disease occurence.

AB - The association of dietary fat with breast cancer in prospective cohort studies has generally been weak and not statistically significant. However, these studies have not considered whether the risk related to fat intake may differ according to estrogen or progesterone receptor status. Dietary habits and other breast cancer risk factors were assessed by mailed questionnaire in January 1986 in 34,388 postmenopausal Iowa women. Through 1991, 724 incident breast cancer cases were ascertained in this cohort using the Iowa cancer registry. Joint estrogen and progesterone receptor status was determined for 479 (66%) breast cancers. For tumors that were positive for both estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER+/PR+) (n = 329), age- and energy-adjusted relative risks for breast cancer adjusted from lowest to highest third of fat intake were 1.0, 1.05, and 1.22 (P trend = 0.14). Corresponding risks for ER+/PR- tumors (n = 75) were 1.0, 0.85, and 1.05 (P trend = 0.86) and for ER-/PR- tumors (n = 61) were 1.0, 1.06, and 0.73 (P trend = 0.68). Only 14 cases were classified as having ER-/PR+ tumors. Adjustment for other breast cancer risk factors did not appreciably alter these findings. There was a suggestion that dietary fat may be associated with ER+/PR+ breast cancers and not other breast cancers. These results are also consistent with an interpretation of no association between dietary fat with breast cancer, regardless of hormone receptor status. It has been suggested that etiological studies of breast cancer should investigate associations according to receptor status. This study provides evidence of a subset of breast cancers that may be related to dietary factors. Similar analyses in other studies would provide information as to whether the associations suggested here are etiologyically important or represent random fluctuations in the patterns of disease occurence.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028872329&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028872329&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 11

EP - 19

JO - Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention

JF - Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention

SN - 1055-9965

IS - 1

ER -