Diagnostic utility of letter fluency, category fluency, and fluency difference scores in Alzheimer's disease

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

91 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Word generation tasks, specifically letter fluency and category fluency, are a standard part of most test protocols used by clinical neuropsychologists to measure aspects of language and executive retrieval functions. Given the reliance on these measures as clinical tools, it is important to understand the diagnostic implications of patients' performances. In Alzheimer's disease (AD), category fluency has generally been found to be disproportionately impaired, whereas letter fluency is usually more mildly impaired. It has been proposed that this performance pattern occurs because access to temporal-lobe semantic stores is necessary for category fluency but not letter fluency. In this study, the diagnostic utility of category fluency, letter fluency, and difference scores (letter fluency minus category fluency) in AD were examined. Forty AD patients and 221 normal control subjects took category fluency and letter fluency tests. Traditional t-test comparisons revealed that the groups differed significantly on the two test tasks and in terms of mean difference scores. However, using sensitivity and specificity to calculate predictive values, only category fluency and letter fluency (but not difference scores) were useful in predicting AD in individuals. Furthermore, category fluency was superior to letter fluency in this regard. Likelihood ratio tables are provided for use in calculating the odds of AD for specific category fluency and letter fluency scores generated by individual patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)35-42
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Neuropsychologist
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Alzheimer Disease
Executive Function
Temporal Lobe
Clinical Protocols
Semantics
Language
Diagnostics
Fluency
Alzheimer's Disease
Letters
Sensitivity and Specificity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

@article{19d629eeee82499f9d8c4c6b0ce5a02b,
title = "Diagnostic utility of letter fluency, category fluency, and fluency difference scores in Alzheimer's disease",
abstract = "Word generation tasks, specifically letter fluency and category fluency, are a standard part of most test protocols used by clinical neuropsychologists to measure aspects of language and executive retrieval functions. Given the reliance on these measures as clinical tools, it is important to understand the diagnostic implications of patients' performances. In Alzheimer's disease (AD), category fluency has generally been found to be disproportionately impaired, whereas letter fluency is usually more mildly impaired. It has been proposed that this performance pattern occurs because access to temporal-lobe semantic stores is necessary for category fluency but not letter fluency. In this study, the diagnostic utility of category fluency, letter fluency, and difference scores (letter fluency minus category fluency) in AD were examined. Forty AD patients and 221 normal control subjects took category fluency and letter fluency tests. Traditional t-test comparisons revealed that the groups differed significantly on the two test tasks and in terms of mean difference scores. However, using sensitivity and specificity to calculate predictive values, only category fluency and letter fluency (but not difference scores) were useful in predicting AD in individuals. Furthermore, category fluency was superior to letter fluency in this regard. Likelihood ratio tables are provided for use in calculating the odds of AD for specific category fluency and letter fluency scores generated by individual patients.",
author = "Cerhan, {Jane H} and Ivnik, {Robert J.} and Smith, {Glenn E.} and Tangalos, {Eric George} and Petersen, {Ronald Carl} and Boeve, {Bradley F}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1076/clin.16.1.35.8326",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "35--42",
journal = "The Clinical neuropsychologist",
issn = "1385-4046",
publisher = "Swets & Zeitlinger",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnostic utility of letter fluency, category fluency, and fluency difference scores in Alzheimer's disease

AU - Cerhan, Jane H

AU - Ivnik, Robert J.

AU - Smith, Glenn E.

AU - Tangalos, Eric George

AU - Petersen, Ronald Carl

AU - Boeve, Bradley F

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Word generation tasks, specifically letter fluency and category fluency, are a standard part of most test protocols used by clinical neuropsychologists to measure aspects of language and executive retrieval functions. Given the reliance on these measures as clinical tools, it is important to understand the diagnostic implications of patients' performances. In Alzheimer's disease (AD), category fluency has generally been found to be disproportionately impaired, whereas letter fluency is usually more mildly impaired. It has been proposed that this performance pattern occurs because access to temporal-lobe semantic stores is necessary for category fluency but not letter fluency. In this study, the diagnostic utility of category fluency, letter fluency, and difference scores (letter fluency minus category fluency) in AD were examined. Forty AD patients and 221 normal control subjects took category fluency and letter fluency tests. Traditional t-test comparisons revealed that the groups differed significantly on the two test tasks and in terms of mean difference scores. However, using sensitivity and specificity to calculate predictive values, only category fluency and letter fluency (but not difference scores) were useful in predicting AD in individuals. Furthermore, category fluency was superior to letter fluency in this regard. Likelihood ratio tables are provided for use in calculating the odds of AD for specific category fluency and letter fluency scores generated by individual patients.

AB - Word generation tasks, specifically letter fluency and category fluency, are a standard part of most test protocols used by clinical neuropsychologists to measure aspects of language and executive retrieval functions. Given the reliance on these measures as clinical tools, it is important to understand the diagnostic implications of patients' performances. In Alzheimer's disease (AD), category fluency has generally been found to be disproportionately impaired, whereas letter fluency is usually more mildly impaired. It has been proposed that this performance pattern occurs because access to temporal-lobe semantic stores is necessary for category fluency but not letter fluency. In this study, the diagnostic utility of category fluency, letter fluency, and difference scores (letter fluency minus category fluency) in AD were examined. Forty AD patients and 221 normal control subjects took category fluency and letter fluency tests. Traditional t-test comparisons revealed that the groups differed significantly on the two test tasks and in terms of mean difference scores. However, using sensitivity and specificity to calculate predictive values, only category fluency and letter fluency (but not difference scores) were useful in predicting AD in individuals. Furthermore, category fluency was superior to letter fluency in this regard. Likelihood ratio tables are provided for use in calculating the odds of AD for specific category fluency and letter fluency scores generated by individual patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036270682&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036270682&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1076/clin.16.1.35.8326

DO - 10.1076/clin.16.1.35.8326

M3 - Article

C2 - 11992224

AN - SCOPUS:0036270682

VL - 16

SP - 35

EP - 42

JO - The Clinical neuropsychologist

JF - The Clinical neuropsychologist

SN - 1385-4046

IS - 1

ER -