Diagnostic performance of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic images of selected pathologies evaluated by receiver operating characteristic analysis

Marek Belohlavek, D. A. Foley, J. B. Seward, James F Greenleaf

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The sensitivity and specificity of 2-D and 3-D echocardiographic images for the detection of selected morphological abnormalities were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Five experienced clinical echocardiographers blinded to the patients' diagnoses evaluated the 20 original static 2-D image sets and 20 corresponding 3-D reconstructions using a five point categorical scale that ranged from definitely abnormal to definitely normal. The ROC curve for the 3-D images was significantly (P < 0.05) closer to the ideal discrimination function than was the ROC curve for the 2-D transesophageal images (i.e., the sensitivity of the 3-D images was higher than that of the 2-D sequential images at the same specificity). In conclusion: 3-D transesophageal images provided better visual clues for the identification of morphological abnormalities than did serial 2-D echocardiographic images despite the same input information in both image formats. The use of ROC analysis assisted in the comparison of these two imaging techniques.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)635-645
Number of pages11
JournalEchocardiography
Volume11
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1994

Fingerprint

Three-Dimensional Imaging
ROC Curve
Pathology
Sensitivity and Specificity

Keywords

  • ROC analysis
  • three-dimensional echocardiography
  • transesophageal echocardiography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

@article{cf6781145d2a49e2a47a20c721f44aed,
title = "Diagnostic performance of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic images of selected pathologies evaluated by receiver operating characteristic analysis",
abstract = "The sensitivity and specificity of 2-D and 3-D echocardiographic images for the detection of selected morphological abnormalities were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Five experienced clinical echocardiographers blinded to the patients' diagnoses evaluated the 20 original static 2-D image sets and 20 corresponding 3-D reconstructions using a five point categorical scale that ranged from definitely abnormal to definitely normal. The ROC curve for the 3-D images was significantly (P < 0.05) closer to the ideal discrimination function than was the ROC curve for the 2-D transesophageal images (i.e., the sensitivity of the 3-D images was higher than that of the 2-D sequential images at the same specificity). In conclusion: 3-D transesophageal images provided better visual clues for the identification of morphological abnormalities than did serial 2-D echocardiographic images despite the same input information in both image formats. The use of ROC analysis assisted in the comparison of these two imaging techniques.",
keywords = "ROC analysis, three-dimensional echocardiography, transesophageal echocardiography",
author = "Marek Belohlavek and Foley, {D. A.} and Seward, {J. B.} and Greenleaf, {James F}",
year = "1994",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "635--645",
journal = "Echocardiography",
issn = "0742-2822",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnostic performance of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic images of selected pathologies evaluated by receiver operating characteristic analysis

AU - Belohlavek, Marek

AU - Foley, D. A.

AU - Seward, J. B.

AU - Greenleaf, James F

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - The sensitivity and specificity of 2-D and 3-D echocardiographic images for the detection of selected morphological abnormalities were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Five experienced clinical echocardiographers blinded to the patients' diagnoses evaluated the 20 original static 2-D image sets and 20 corresponding 3-D reconstructions using a five point categorical scale that ranged from definitely abnormal to definitely normal. The ROC curve for the 3-D images was significantly (P < 0.05) closer to the ideal discrimination function than was the ROC curve for the 2-D transesophageal images (i.e., the sensitivity of the 3-D images was higher than that of the 2-D sequential images at the same specificity). In conclusion: 3-D transesophageal images provided better visual clues for the identification of morphological abnormalities than did serial 2-D echocardiographic images despite the same input information in both image formats. The use of ROC analysis assisted in the comparison of these two imaging techniques.

AB - The sensitivity and specificity of 2-D and 3-D echocardiographic images for the detection of selected morphological abnormalities were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Five experienced clinical echocardiographers blinded to the patients' diagnoses evaluated the 20 original static 2-D image sets and 20 corresponding 3-D reconstructions using a five point categorical scale that ranged from definitely abnormal to definitely normal. The ROC curve for the 3-D images was significantly (P < 0.05) closer to the ideal discrimination function than was the ROC curve for the 2-D transesophageal images (i.e., the sensitivity of the 3-D images was higher than that of the 2-D sequential images at the same specificity). In conclusion: 3-D transesophageal images provided better visual clues for the identification of morphological abnormalities than did serial 2-D echocardiographic images despite the same input information in both image formats. The use of ROC analysis assisted in the comparison of these two imaging techniques.

KW - ROC analysis

KW - three-dimensional echocardiography

KW - transesophageal echocardiography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028036750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028036750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10150633

AN - SCOPUS:0028036750

VL - 11

SP - 635

EP - 645

JO - Echocardiography

JF - Echocardiography

SN - 0742-2822

IS - 6

ER -