Diabetes and hyperglycemia quality improvement efforts in hospitals in the united states: Current status, practice variation, and barriers to implementation

Curtiss B. Cook, Beth Elias, Gail L. Kongable, Daniel J. Potter, Katherine M. Shepherd, David McMahon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine the status of diabetes and hyperglycemia quality improvement efforts in hospitals in the United States. Methods: We designed and administered a survey to a convenience sample of hospitals, and the responses were analyzed statistically. Results: We received 269 responses from 1,151 requested surveys. The sample was similar to hospitals in the United States on the basis of hospital type and geographic region (P = no significant difference) but not on the basis of number of beds (P<.001). Among responding hospitals, 39%, 21%, and 15% had fully implemented inpatient diabetes and hyperglycemia quality improvement programs for critically ill, non-critically ill, and perioperative patients, respectively. Moreover, 77%, 44%, and 49% had fully implemented protocols for hypoglycemia, hyperglycemic crises, and diabetic ketoacidosis, respectively. Variations in glucose target ranges were noted. The responding hospitals had no standard biochemical definition of hypoglycemia; 47% defined hypoglycemia as a glucose level ≤70 mg/dL, but 29%, 8%, 6%, and 4% used <60, <50, <40, and <80 mg/dL, respectively. Almost a third of reporting hospitals had no metric to track the quality of inpatient diabetes and hyperglycemia care. More than half (59%) indicated that they did not have an automated capability to extract and analyze glucose data. The most frequent barrier to implementing a glycemic control program was concern regarding hypoglycemia (61%). Conclusion: Hospitals are addressing the issue of inpatient diabetes and glycemic control but face obstacles to implementation of quality improvement programs and vary in their approach to management. Improving the consistency of glucose control practices within hospitals in the United States should help enhance patient care and safety. Future efforts to help hospitals overcome barriers to introducing glucose control programs could include developing standardized glycemic control metrics, improving data collection and reporting methods, and providing improved tools that enable clinicians to control glucose safely.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)219-230
Number of pages12
JournalEndocrine Practice
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2010

Fingerprint

Quality Improvement
Hyperglycemia
Hypoglycemia
Glucose
Inpatients
Diabetic Ketoacidosis
Patient Safety
Critical Illness
Patient Care
Research Design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Diabetes and hyperglycemia quality improvement efforts in hospitals in the united states : Current status, practice variation, and barriers to implementation. / Cook, Curtiss B.; Elias, Beth; Kongable, Gail L.; Potter, Daniel J.; Shepherd, Katherine M.; McMahon, David.

In: Endocrine Practice, Vol. 16, No. 2, 03.2010, p. 219-230.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cook, Curtiss B. ; Elias, Beth ; Kongable, Gail L. ; Potter, Daniel J. ; Shepherd, Katherine M. ; McMahon, David. / Diabetes and hyperglycemia quality improvement efforts in hospitals in the united states : Current status, practice variation, and barriers to implementation. In: Endocrine Practice. 2010 ; Vol. 16, No. 2. pp. 219-230.
@article{b4519d83052448b5850df9e93ff455d2,
title = "Diabetes and hyperglycemia quality improvement efforts in hospitals in the united states: Current status, practice variation, and barriers to implementation",
abstract = "Objective: To determine the status of diabetes and hyperglycemia quality improvement efforts in hospitals in the United States. Methods: We designed and administered a survey to a convenience sample of hospitals, and the responses were analyzed statistically. Results: We received 269 responses from 1,151 requested surveys. The sample was similar to hospitals in the United States on the basis of hospital type and geographic region (P = no significant difference) but not on the basis of number of beds (P<.001). Among responding hospitals, 39{\%}, 21{\%}, and 15{\%} had fully implemented inpatient diabetes and hyperglycemia quality improvement programs for critically ill, non-critically ill, and perioperative patients, respectively. Moreover, 77{\%}, 44{\%}, and 49{\%} had fully implemented protocols for hypoglycemia, hyperglycemic crises, and diabetic ketoacidosis, respectively. Variations in glucose target ranges were noted. The responding hospitals had no standard biochemical definition of hypoglycemia; 47{\%} defined hypoglycemia as a glucose level ≤70 mg/dL, but 29{\%}, 8{\%}, 6{\%}, and 4{\%} used <60, <50, <40, and <80 mg/dL, respectively. Almost a third of reporting hospitals had no metric to track the quality of inpatient diabetes and hyperglycemia care. More than half (59{\%}) indicated that they did not have an automated capability to extract and analyze glucose data. The most frequent barrier to implementing a glycemic control program was concern regarding hypoglycemia (61{\%}). Conclusion: Hospitals are addressing the issue of inpatient diabetes and glycemic control but face obstacles to implementation of quality improvement programs and vary in their approach to management. Improving the consistency of glucose control practices within hospitals in the United States should help enhance patient care and safety. Future efforts to help hospitals overcome barriers to introducing glucose control programs could include developing standardized glycemic control metrics, improving data collection and reporting methods, and providing improved tools that enable clinicians to control glucose safely.",
author = "Cook, {Curtiss B.} and Beth Elias and Kongable, {Gail L.} and Potter, {Daniel J.} and Shepherd, {Katherine M.} and David McMahon",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
doi = "10.4158/EP09234.OR",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "219--230",
journal = "Endocrine Practice",
issn = "1530-891X",
publisher = "American Association of Clinical Endocrinology",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diabetes and hyperglycemia quality improvement efforts in hospitals in the united states

T2 - Current status, practice variation, and barriers to implementation

AU - Cook, Curtiss B.

AU - Elias, Beth

AU - Kongable, Gail L.

AU - Potter, Daniel J.

AU - Shepherd, Katherine M.

AU - McMahon, David

PY - 2010/3

Y1 - 2010/3

N2 - Objective: To determine the status of diabetes and hyperglycemia quality improvement efforts in hospitals in the United States. Methods: We designed and administered a survey to a convenience sample of hospitals, and the responses were analyzed statistically. Results: We received 269 responses from 1,151 requested surveys. The sample was similar to hospitals in the United States on the basis of hospital type and geographic region (P = no significant difference) but not on the basis of number of beds (P<.001). Among responding hospitals, 39%, 21%, and 15% had fully implemented inpatient diabetes and hyperglycemia quality improvement programs for critically ill, non-critically ill, and perioperative patients, respectively. Moreover, 77%, 44%, and 49% had fully implemented protocols for hypoglycemia, hyperglycemic crises, and diabetic ketoacidosis, respectively. Variations in glucose target ranges were noted. The responding hospitals had no standard biochemical definition of hypoglycemia; 47% defined hypoglycemia as a glucose level ≤70 mg/dL, but 29%, 8%, 6%, and 4% used <60, <50, <40, and <80 mg/dL, respectively. Almost a third of reporting hospitals had no metric to track the quality of inpatient diabetes and hyperglycemia care. More than half (59%) indicated that they did not have an automated capability to extract and analyze glucose data. The most frequent barrier to implementing a glycemic control program was concern regarding hypoglycemia (61%). Conclusion: Hospitals are addressing the issue of inpatient diabetes and glycemic control but face obstacles to implementation of quality improvement programs and vary in their approach to management. Improving the consistency of glucose control practices within hospitals in the United States should help enhance patient care and safety. Future efforts to help hospitals overcome barriers to introducing glucose control programs could include developing standardized glycemic control metrics, improving data collection and reporting methods, and providing improved tools that enable clinicians to control glucose safely.

AB - Objective: To determine the status of diabetes and hyperglycemia quality improvement efforts in hospitals in the United States. Methods: We designed and administered a survey to a convenience sample of hospitals, and the responses were analyzed statistically. Results: We received 269 responses from 1,151 requested surveys. The sample was similar to hospitals in the United States on the basis of hospital type and geographic region (P = no significant difference) but not on the basis of number of beds (P<.001). Among responding hospitals, 39%, 21%, and 15% had fully implemented inpatient diabetes and hyperglycemia quality improvement programs for critically ill, non-critically ill, and perioperative patients, respectively. Moreover, 77%, 44%, and 49% had fully implemented protocols for hypoglycemia, hyperglycemic crises, and diabetic ketoacidosis, respectively. Variations in glucose target ranges were noted. The responding hospitals had no standard biochemical definition of hypoglycemia; 47% defined hypoglycemia as a glucose level ≤70 mg/dL, but 29%, 8%, 6%, and 4% used <60, <50, <40, and <80 mg/dL, respectively. Almost a third of reporting hospitals had no metric to track the quality of inpatient diabetes and hyperglycemia care. More than half (59%) indicated that they did not have an automated capability to extract and analyze glucose data. The most frequent barrier to implementing a glycemic control program was concern regarding hypoglycemia (61%). Conclusion: Hospitals are addressing the issue of inpatient diabetes and glycemic control but face obstacles to implementation of quality improvement programs and vary in their approach to management. Improving the consistency of glucose control practices within hospitals in the United States should help enhance patient care and safety. Future efforts to help hospitals overcome barriers to introducing glucose control programs could include developing standardized glycemic control metrics, improving data collection and reporting methods, and providing improved tools that enable clinicians to control glucose safely.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953936763&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953936763&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4158/EP09234.OR

DO - 10.4158/EP09234.OR

M3 - Article

C2 - 20061279

AN - SCOPUS:77953936763

VL - 16

SP - 219

EP - 230

JO - Endocrine Practice

JF - Endocrine Practice

SN - 1530-891X

IS - 2

ER -