Devices to improve colon polyp detection

Petar Mamula, William M. Tierney, Subhas Banerjee, David Desilets, David L. Diehl, Francis A. Farraye, Vivek Kaul, Sripathi R. Kethu, Richard S. Kwon, Marcos C. Pedrosa, Sarah A. Rodriguez, Louis Michel Wong Kee Song

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The ASGE Technology Committee provides reviews of existing, new, or emerging endoscopic technologies that have an impact on the practice of GI endoscopy. Evidencebased methodology is used, performing a MEDLINE literature search to identify pertinent clinical studies on the topic and a MAUDE (U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health) database search to identify the reported complications of a given technology. Both are supplemented by accessing the "related articles" feature of PubMed and by scrutinizing pertinent references cited by the identified studies. Controlled clinical trials are emphasized, but in many cases, data from randomized, controlled trials are lacking. In such cases, large case series, preliminary clinical studies, and expert opinions are used. Technical data are gathered from traditional and Web-based publications, proprietary publications, and informal communications with pertinent vendors. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are drafted by 1 or 2 members of the ASGE Technology Committee, reviewed and edited by the Committee as a whole, and approved by the Governing Board of the ASGE. When financial guidance is indicated, the most recent coding data and list prices at the time of publication are provided. For this review, the MEDLINE database was searched through March 2010 for articles related to endoscopy in patients with "colon polyps" by using the key words "colon polyp," "colon adenoma," and "colon neoplasm" paired with "colonoscopy," "third eye retroscope," "cap-fitted," "cap-assisted," "transparent cap," "retroflexion," "endoscope," "colonoscope," "detection," and "wide-angle." Technology Status Evaluation Reports are scientific reviews provided solely for educational and informational purposes. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are not rules and should not be construed as establishing a legal standard of care or as encouraging, advocating, requiring, or discouraging any particular treatment or payment for such treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1092-1097
Number of pages6
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume73
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Polyps
Colon
Technology
Equipment and Supplies
Publications
MEDLINE
Endoscopy
Radiologic Health
Governing Board
Colonoscopes
Databases
Endoscopes
Controlled Clinical Trials
Expert Testimony
Advisory Committees
United States Food and Drug Administration
Colonoscopy
Standard of Care
PubMed
Adenoma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Mamula, P., Tierney, W. M., Banerjee, S., Desilets, D., Diehl, D. L., Farraye, F. A., ... Wong Kee Song, L. M. (2011). Devices to improve colon polyp detection. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 73(6), 1092-1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.062

Devices to improve colon polyp detection. / Mamula, Petar; Tierney, William M.; Banerjee, Subhas; Desilets, David; Diehl, David L.; Farraye, Francis A.; Kaul, Vivek; Kethu, Sripathi R.; Kwon, Richard S.; Pedrosa, Marcos C.; Rodriguez, Sarah A.; Wong Kee Song, Louis Michel.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 73, No. 6, 06.2011, p. 1092-1097.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mamula, P, Tierney, WM, Banerjee, S, Desilets, D, Diehl, DL, Farraye, FA, Kaul, V, Kethu, SR, Kwon, RS, Pedrosa, MC, Rodriguez, SA & Wong Kee Song, LM 2011, 'Devices to improve colon polyp detection', Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 1092-1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.062
Mamula P, Tierney WM, Banerjee S, Desilets D, Diehl DL, Farraye FA et al. Devices to improve colon polyp detection. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2011 Jun;73(6):1092-1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.062
Mamula, Petar ; Tierney, William M. ; Banerjee, Subhas ; Desilets, David ; Diehl, David L. ; Farraye, Francis A. ; Kaul, Vivek ; Kethu, Sripathi R. ; Kwon, Richard S. ; Pedrosa, Marcos C. ; Rodriguez, Sarah A. ; Wong Kee Song, Louis Michel. / Devices to improve colon polyp detection. In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2011 ; Vol. 73, No. 6. pp. 1092-1097.
@article{27bf397dbfde47a8b2e79c716cb4fbb6,
title = "Devices to improve colon polyp detection",
abstract = "The ASGE Technology Committee provides reviews of existing, new, or emerging endoscopic technologies that have an impact on the practice of GI endoscopy. Evidencebased methodology is used, performing a MEDLINE literature search to identify pertinent clinical studies on the topic and a MAUDE (U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health) database search to identify the reported complications of a given technology. Both are supplemented by accessing the {"}related articles{"} feature of PubMed and by scrutinizing pertinent references cited by the identified studies. Controlled clinical trials are emphasized, but in many cases, data from randomized, controlled trials are lacking. In such cases, large case series, preliminary clinical studies, and expert opinions are used. Technical data are gathered from traditional and Web-based publications, proprietary publications, and informal communications with pertinent vendors. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are drafted by 1 or 2 members of the ASGE Technology Committee, reviewed and edited by the Committee as a whole, and approved by the Governing Board of the ASGE. When financial guidance is indicated, the most recent coding data and list prices at the time of publication are provided. For this review, the MEDLINE database was searched through March 2010 for articles related to endoscopy in patients with {"}colon polyps{"} by using the key words {"}colon polyp,{"} {"}colon adenoma,{"} and {"}colon neoplasm{"} paired with {"}colonoscopy,{"} {"}third eye retroscope,{"} {"}cap-fitted,{"} {"}cap-assisted,{"} {"}transparent cap,{"} {"}retroflexion,{"} {"}endoscope,{"} {"}colonoscope,{"} {"}detection,{"} and {"}wide-angle.{"} Technology Status Evaluation Reports are scientific reviews provided solely for educational and informational purposes. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are not rules and should not be construed as establishing a legal standard of care or as encouraging, advocating, requiring, or discouraging any particular treatment or payment for such treatment.",
author = "Petar Mamula and Tierney, {William M.} and Subhas Banerjee and David Desilets and Diehl, {David L.} and Farraye, {Francis A.} and Vivek Kaul and Kethu, {Sripathi R.} and Kwon, {Richard S.} and Pedrosa, {Marcos C.} and Rodriguez, {Sarah A.} and {Wong Kee Song}, {Louis Michel}",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.062",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "73",
pages = "1092--1097",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Devices to improve colon polyp detection

AU - Mamula, Petar

AU - Tierney, William M.

AU - Banerjee, Subhas

AU - Desilets, David

AU - Diehl, David L.

AU - Farraye, Francis A.

AU - Kaul, Vivek

AU - Kethu, Sripathi R.

AU - Kwon, Richard S.

AU - Pedrosa, Marcos C.

AU - Rodriguez, Sarah A.

AU - Wong Kee Song, Louis Michel

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - The ASGE Technology Committee provides reviews of existing, new, or emerging endoscopic technologies that have an impact on the practice of GI endoscopy. Evidencebased methodology is used, performing a MEDLINE literature search to identify pertinent clinical studies on the topic and a MAUDE (U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health) database search to identify the reported complications of a given technology. Both are supplemented by accessing the "related articles" feature of PubMed and by scrutinizing pertinent references cited by the identified studies. Controlled clinical trials are emphasized, but in many cases, data from randomized, controlled trials are lacking. In such cases, large case series, preliminary clinical studies, and expert opinions are used. Technical data are gathered from traditional and Web-based publications, proprietary publications, and informal communications with pertinent vendors. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are drafted by 1 or 2 members of the ASGE Technology Committee, reviewed and edited by the Committee as a whole, and approved by the Governing Board of the ASGE. When financial guidance is indicated, the most recent coding data and list prices at the time of publication are provided. For this review, the MEDLINE database was searched through March 2010 for articles related to endoscopy in patients with "colon polyps" by using the key words "colon polyp," "colon adenoma," and "colon neoplasm" paired with "colonoscopy," "third eye retroscope," "cap-fitted," "cap-assisted," "transparent cap," "retroflexion," "endoscope," "colonoscope," "detection," and "wide-angle." Technology Status Evaluation Reports are scientific reviews provided solely for educational and informational purposes. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are not rules and should not be construed as establishing a legal standard of care or as encouraging, advocating, requiring, or discouraging any particular treatment or payment for such treatment.

AB - The ASGE Technology Committee provides reviews of existing, new, or emerging endoscopic technologies that have an impact on the practice of GI endoscopy. Evidencebased methodology is used, performing a MEDLINE literature search to identify pertinent clinical studies on the topic and a MAUDE (U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health) database search to identify the reported complications of a given technology. Both are supplemented by accessing the "related articles" feature of PubMed and by scrutinizing pertinent references cited by the identified studies. Controlled clinical trials are emphasized, but in many cases, data from randomized, controlled trials are lacking. In such cases, large case series, preliminary clinical studies, and expert opinions are used. Technical data are gathered from traditional and Web-based publications, proprietary publications, and informal communications with pertinent vendors. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are drafted by 1 or 2 members of the ASGE Technology Committee, reviewed and edited by the Committee as a whole, and approved by the Governing Board of the ASGE. When financial guidance is indicated, the most recent coding data and list prices at the time of publication are provided. For this review, the MEDLINE database was searched through March 2010 for articles related to endoscopy in patients with "colon polyps" by using the key words "colon polyp," "colon adenoma," and "colon neoplasm" paired with "colonoscopy," "third eye retroscope," "cap-fitted," "cap-assisted," "transparent cap," "retroflexion," "endoscope," "colonoscope," "detection," and "wide-angle." Technology Status Evaluation Reports are scientific reviews provided solely for educational and informational purposes. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are not rules and should not be construed as establishing a legal standard of care or as encouraging, advocating, requiring, or discouraging any particular treatment or payment for such treatment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957845959&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79957845959&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.062

DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.062

M3 - Article

VL - 73

SP - 1092

EP - 1097

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 6

ER -