Development of a cathartic-free colorectal cancer screening test using virtual colonoscopy: a feasibility study.

Kristina T. Johnson, Michael J. Carston, Robert J. Wentz, Armando Manduca, Steven M. Anderson, C. Daniel Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to develop a method to subtract barium-labeled stool from the colon using a phantom and to evaluate the performance of the technique in a pilot human population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A phantom containing 6-mm flat polyps and three types of simulated stool (homogeneous, moderately heterogeneous, and severely heterogeneous) mixed with barium was created, scanned, and tested using three stool subtraction algorithms but no cathartic. Thirty patients with suspected colorectal polyps were studied using stool tagging to determine which was the most effective stool subtraction algorithm. Colonoscopy was the reference standard. Examinations were evaluated blindly using the unsubtracted and 6 weeks later both the unsubtracted and subtracted data sets. RESULTS: A threshold of 200 H and expansion and convolution techniques were the most effective tools for subtracting stool and minimizing artifacts. When applied to the human population, sensitivities using the unsubtracted data sets were 90% (18/20) and 68% (26/38) for polyps > or = 1 cm and > or = 5 mm, respectively. Specificities were 100% (4/4) and 75% (3/4) for polyps > or = 1 cm and > or = 5 mm. For the stool-subtracted data sets, sensitivities were 90% (18/20) and 71% (27/38) for polyps > or = 1 cm and > or = 5 mm. Per patient sensitivities were 88% (15/17) and 77% (20/26) for > or = 1 cm and > or = 5 mm polyps. Specificities were 100% (4/4) for large polyps and 25% (1/4) for smaller polyps. CONCLUSION: Image processing tools combining thresholding, expansion, and convolution were the most useful for stool subtraction. Laxative-free colon examinations using barium for stool labeling can be performed at CT colonography with or without stool subtraction with high accuracy. Further study is warranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAJR. American journal of roentgenology
Volume188
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2007

Fingerprint

Cathartics
Computed Tomographic Colonography
Feasibility Studies
Polyps
Early Detection of Cancer
Colorectal Neoplasms
Barium
Colon
Laxatives
Colonoscopy
Artifacts
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Development of a cathartic-free colorectal cancer screening test using virtual colonoscopy : a feasibility study. / Johnson, Kristina T.; Carston, Michael J.; Wentz, Robert J.; Manduca, Armando; Anderson, Steven M.; Johnson, C. Daniel.

In: AJR. American journal of roentgenology, Vol. 188, No. 1, 01.2007.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fe1c712b45fc45b186244718d8eb1dd4,
title = "Development of a cathartic-free colorectal cancer screening test using virtual colonoscopy: a feasibility study.",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to develop a method to subtract barium-labeled stool from the colon using a phantom and to evaluate the performance of the technique in a pilot human population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A phantom containing 6-mm flat polyps and three types of simulated stool (homogeneous, moderately heterogeneous, and severely heterogeneous) mixed with barium was created, scanned, and tested using three stool subtraction algorithms but no cathartic. Thirty patients with suspected colorectal polyps were studied using stool tagging to determine which was the most effective stool subtraction algorithm. Colonoscopy was the reference standard. Examinations were evaluated blindly using the unsubtracted and 6 weeks later both the unsubtracted and subtracted data sets. RESULTS: A threshold of 200 H and expansion and convolution techniques were the most effective tools for subtracting stool and minimizing artifacts. When applied to the human population, sensitivities using the unsubtracted data sets were 90{\%} (18/20) and 68{\%} (26/38) for polyps > or = 1 cm and > or = 5 mm, respectively. Specificities were 100{\%} (4/4) and 75{\%} (3/4) for polyps > or = 1 cm and > or = 5 mm. For the stool-subtracted data sets, sensitivities were 90{\%} (18/20) and 71{\%} (27/38) for polyps > or = 1 cm and > or = 5 mm. Per patient sensitivities were 88{\%} (15/17) and 77{\%} (20/26) for > or = 1 cm and > or = 5 mm polyps. Specificities were 100{\%} (4/4) for large polyps and 25{\%} (1/4) for smaller polyps. CONCLUSION: Image processing tools combining thresholding, expansion, and convolution were the most useful for stool subtraction. Laxative-free colon examinations using barium for stool labeling can be performed at CT colonography with or without stool subtraction with high accuracy. Further study is warranted.",
author = "Johnson, {Kristina T.} and Carston, {Michael J.} and Wentz, {Robert J.} and Armando Manduca and Anderson, {Steven M.} and Johnson, {C. Daniel}",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
doi = "10.2214/AJR.05.1484",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "188",
journal = "American Journal of Roentgenology",
issn = "0361-803X",
publisher = "American Roentgen Ray Society",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of a cathartic-free colorectal cancer screening test using virtual colonoscopy

T2 - a feasibility study.

AU - Johnson, Kristina T.

AU - Carston, Michael J.

AU - Wentz, Robert J.

AU - Manduca, Armando

AU - Anderson, Steven M.

AU - Johnson, C. Daniel

PY - 2007/1

Y1 - 2007/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to develop a method to subtract barium-labeled stool from the colon using a phantom and to evaluate the performance of the technique in a pilot human population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A phantom containing 6-mm flat polyps and three types of simulated stool (homogeneous, moderately heterogeneous, and severely heterogeneous) mixed with barium was created, scanned, and tested using three stool subtraction algorithms but no cathartic. Thirty patients with suspected colorectal polyps were studied using stool tagging to determine which was the most effective stool subtraction algorithm. Colonoscopy was the reference standard. Examinations were evaluated blindly using the unsubtracted and 6 weeks later both the unsubtracted and subtracted data sets. RESULTS: A threshold of 200 H and expansion and convolution techniques were the most effective tools for subtracting stool and minimizing artifacts. When applied to the human population, sensitivities using the unsubtracted data sets were 90% (18/20) and 68% (26/38) for polyps > or = 1 cm and > or = 5 mm, respectively. Specificities were 100% (4/4) and 75% (3/4) for polyps > or = 1 cm and > or = 5 mm. For the stool-subtracted data sets, sensitivities were 90% (18/20) and 71% (27/38) for polyps > or = 1 cm and > or = 5 mm. Per patient sensitivities were 88% (15/17) and 77% (20/26) for > or = 1 cm and > or = 5 mm polyps. Specificities were 100% (4/4) for large polyps and 25% (1/4) for smaller polyps. CONCLUSION: Image processing tools combining thresholding, expansion, and convolution were the most useful for stool subtraction. Laxative-free colon examinations using barium for stool labeling can be performed at CT colonography with or without stool subtraction with high accuracy. Further study is warranted.

AB - OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to develop a method to subtract barium-labeled stool from the colon using a phantom and to evaluate the performance of the technique in a pilot human population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A phantom containing 6-mm flat polyps and three types of simulated stool (homogeneous, moderately heterogeneous, and severely heterogeneous) mixed with barium was created, scanned, and tested using three stool subtraction algorithms but no cathartic. Thirty patients with suspected colorectal polyps were studied using stool tagging to determine which was the most effective stool subtraction algorithm. Colonoscopy was the reference standard. Examinations were evaluated blindly using the unsubtracted and 6 weeks later both the unsubtracted and subtracted data sets. RESULTS: A threshold of 200 H and expansion and convolution techniques were the most effective tools for subtracting stool and minimizing artifacts. When applied to the human population, sensitivities using the unsubtracted data sets were 90% (18/20) and 68% (26/38) for polyps > or = 1 cm and > or = 5 mm, respectively. Specificities were 100% (4/4) and 75% (3/4) for polyps > or = 1 cm and > or = 5 mm. For the stool-subtracted data sets, sensitivities were 90% (18/20) and 71% (27/38) for polyps > or = 1 cm and > or = 5 mm. Per patient sensitivities were 88% (15/17) and 77% (20/26) for > or = 1 cm and > or = 5 mm polyps. Specificities were 100% (4/4) for large polyps and 25% (1/4) for smaller polyps. CONCLUSION: Image processing tools combining thresholding, expansion, and convolution were the most useful for stool subtraction. Laxative-free colon examinations using barium for stool labeling can be performed at CT colonography with or without stool subtraction with high accuracy. Further study is warranted.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249940340&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34249940340&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2214/AJR.05.1484

DO - 10.2214/AJR.05.1484

M3 - Article

C2 - 17179324

AN - SCOPUS:34249940340

VL - 188

JO - American Journal of Roentgenology

JF - American Journal of Roentgenology

SN - 0361-803X

IS - 1

ER -