Development and initial testing of Asthma Predictive Index for a retrospective study: An exploratory study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Asthma Predictive Index (API) has been used for predicting asthma in prospective or cross-sectional studies, not for a retrospective study. We aim to develop and validate API for a retrospective study. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study based on a convenience sample of children who participated in a previous retrospective cohort study. API was operationalized by two or more wheezing episodes in a year during the first 3 years of life PLUS one of the major or two of the minor criteria of the original API. We assessed validity of retrospective API against Predetermined Asthma Criteria (PAC) which has been extensively used in clinical studies for asthma. We assessed criterion validity by measuring kappa and agreement rate between API and PAC and construct validity by determining associations of API with known risk factors for asthma. Results: Of the eligible 105 children, 55 (52.4%) were male, 90 (85.7%) Caucasians, and the mean age (±SD) was 5.8 years (±1.5). API criteria was met by 15 (14.3%), compared to 33 (31.4%) by PAC, respectively. The agreement rate and kappa between API and definite asthma of PAC were 89.5% and 0.66 (p<0.01). Atopic conditions, lower parental education, no history of breastfeeding and family history of asthma were significantly associated with risk of asthma by API. Conclusions: Application of API to a retrospective study for ascertaining asthma status is suitable. Our study findings need to be replicated by future studies with a larger sample size.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)183-190
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Asthma
Volume52
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2015

Fingerprint

Asthma
Retrospective Studies
Cross-Sectional Studies
Respiratory Sounds
Breast Feeding
Sample Size

Keywords

  • Asthma ascertainment
  • Asthma predictive index
  • Predetermined asthma criteria
  • Retrospective study
  • Wheezing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Development and initial testing of Asthma Predictive Index for a retrospective study : An exploratory study. / Wi, Chung Il; Park, Miguel; Juhn, Young J.

In: Journal of Asthma, Vol. 52, No. 2, 01.03.2015, p. 183-190.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{55191dae00c546d5a38455c290d5df5f,
title = "Development and initial testing of Asthma Predictive Index for a retrospective study: An exploratory study",
abstract = "Objective: Asthma Predictive Index (API) has been used for predicting asthma in prospective or cross-sectional studies, not for a retrospective study. We aim to develop and validate API for a retrospective study. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study based on a convenience sample of children who participated in a previous retrospective cohort study. API was operationalized by two or more wheezing episodes in a year during the first 3 years of life PLUS one of the major or two of the minor criteria of the original API. We assessed validity of retrospective API against Predetermined Asthma Criteria (PAC) which has been extensively used in clinical studies for asthma. We assessed criterion validity by measuring kappa and agreement rate between API and PAC and construct validity by determining associations of API with known risk factors for asthma. Results: Of the eligible 105 children, 55 (52.4{\%}) were male, 90 (85.7{\%}) Caucasians, and the mean age (±SD) was 5.8 years (±1.5). API criteria was met by 15 (14.3{\%}), compared to 33 (31.4{\%}) by PAC, respectively. The agreement rate and kappa between API and definite asthma of PAC were 89.5{\%} and 0.66 (p<0.01). Atopic conditions, lower parental education, no history of breastfeeding and family history of asthma were significantly associated with risk of asthma by API. Conclusions: Application of API to a retrospective study for ascertaining asthma status is suitable. Our study findings need to be replicated by future studies with a larger sample size.",
keywords = "Asthma ascertainment, Asthma predictive index, Predetermined asthma criteria, Retrospective study, Wheezing",
author = "Wi, {Chung Il} and Miguel Park and Juhn, {Young J}",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3109/02770903.2014.952438",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "183--190",
journal = "Journal of Asthma",
issn = "0277-0903",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development and initial testing of Asthma Predictive Index for a retrospective study

T2 - An exploratory study

AU - Wi, Chung Il

AU - Park, Miguel

AU - Juhn, Young J

PY - 2015/3/1

Y1 - 2015/3/1

N2 - Objective: Asthma Predictive Index (API) has been used for predicting asthma in prospective or cross-sectional studies, not for a retrospective study. We aim to develop and validate API for a retrospective study. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study based on a convenience sample of children who participated in a previous retrospective cohort study. API was operationalized by two or more wheezing episodes in a year during the first 3 years of life PLUS one of the major or two of the minor criteria of the original API. We assessed validity of retrospective API against Predetermined Asthma Criteria (PAC) which has been extensively used in clinical studies for asthma. We assessed criterion validity by measuring kappa and agreement rate between API and PAC and construct validity by determining associations of API with known risk factors for asthma. Results: Of the eligible 105 children, 55 (52.4%) were male, 90 (85.7%) Caucasians, and the mean age (±SD) was 5.8 years (±1.5). API criteria was met by 15 (14.3%), compared to 33 (31.4%) by PAC, respectively. The agreement rate and kappa between API and definite asthma of PAC were 89.5% and 0.66 (p<0.01). Atopic conditions, lower parental education, no history of breastfeeding and family history of asthma were significantly associated with risk of asthma by API. Conclusions: Application of API to a retrospective study for ascertaining asthma status is suitable. Our study findings need to be replicated by future studies with a larger sample size.

AB - Objective: Asthma Predictive Index (API) has been used for predicting asthma in prospective or cross-sectional studies, not for a retrospective study. We aim to develop and validate API for a retrospective study. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study based on a convenience sample of children who participated in a previous retrospective cohort study. API was operationalized by two or more wheezing episodes in a year during the first 3 years of life PLUS one of the major or two of the minor criteria of the original API. We assessed validity of retrospective API against Predetermined Asthma Criteria (PAC) which has been extensively used in clinical studies for asthma. We assessed criterion validity by measuring kappa and agreement rate between API and PAC and construct validity by determining associations of API with known risk factors for asthma. Results: Of the eligible 105 children, 55 (52.4%) were male, 90 (85.7%) Caucasians, and the mean age (±SD) was 5.8 years (±1.5). API criteria was met by 15 (14.3%), compared to 33 (31.4%) by PAC, respectively. The agreement rate and kappa between API and definite asthma of PAC were 89.5% and 0.66 (p<0.01). Atopic conditions, lower parental education, no history of breastfeeding and family history of asthma were significantly associated with risk of asthma by API. Conclusions: Application of API to a retrospective study for ascertaining asthma status is suitable. Our study findings need to be replicated by future studies with a larger sample size.

KW - Asthma ascertainment

KW - Asthma predictive index

KW - Predetermined asthma criteria

KW - Retrospective study

KW - Wheezing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84931099345&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84931099345&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/02770903.2014.952438

DO - 10.3109/02770903.2014.952438

M3 - Article

C2 - 25158051

AN - SCOPUS:84931099345

VL - 52

SP - 183

EP - 190

JO - Journal of Asthma

JF - Journal of Asthma

SN - 0277-0903

IS - 2

ER -