Developing scholarly projects in education: A primer for medical teachers

Thomas J. Beckman, David Allan Cook

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

60 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Boyer and Glassick's broad definition of and standards for assessing scholarship apply to all aspects of education. Research on the quality of published medical education studies also reveals fundamentally important elements to address. In this article a three-step approach to developing medical education projects is proposed: refine the scholarly question, identify appropriate designs and methods, and select outcomes. Refining the scholarly question requires careful attention to literature review, conceptual framework, and statements of problem and study intent. The authors emphasize statement of study intent, which is a study's focal point, and conceptual framework, which situates a project within a theoretical context and provides a means for interpreting the results. They then review study designs and methods commonly used in education projects. They conclude with outcomes, which should be distinguished from assessment methods and instruments, and are separated into Kirkpatrick's hierarchy of reaction, learning, behavior and results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)210-218
Number of pages9
JournalMedical Teacher
Volume29
Issue number2-3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2007

Fingerprint

Medical Education
Education
teacher
education
learning behavior
Learning
Research
literature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Nursing(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Developing scholarly projects in education : A primer for medical teachers. / Beckman, Thomas J.; Cook, David Allan.

In: Medical Teacher, Vol. 29, No. 2-3, 03.2007, p. 210-218.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ebb0ad626b0d4eb2b5c3bf11b5a6a560,
title = "Developing scholarly projects in education: A primer for medical teachers",
abstract = "Boyer and Glassick's broad definition of and standards for assessing scholarship apply to all aspects of education. Research on the quality of published medical education studies also reveals fundamentally important elements to address. In this article a three-step approach to developing medical education projects is proposed: refine the scholarly question, identify appropriate designs and methods, and select outcomes. Refining the scholarly question requires careful attention to literature review, conceptual framework, and statements of problem and study intent. The authors emphasize statement of study intent, which is a study's focal point, and conceptual framework, which situates a project within a theoretical context and provides a means for interpreting the results. They then review study designs and methods commonly used in education projects. They conclude with outcomes, which should be distinguished from assessment methods and instruments, and are separated into Kirkpatrick's hierarchy of reaction, learning, behavior and results.",
author = "Beckman, {Thomas J.} and Cook, {David Allan}",
year = "2007",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1080/01421590701291469",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "210--218",
journal = "Medical Teacher",
issn = "0142-159X",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "2-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Developing scholarly projects in education

T2 - A primer for medical teachers

AU - Beckman, Thomas J.

AU - Cook, David Allan

PY - 2007/3

Y1 - 2007/3

N2 - Boyer and Glassick's broad definition of and standards for assessing scholarship apply to all aspects of education. Research on the quality of published medical education studies also reveals fundamentally important elements to address. In this article a three-step approach to developing medical education projects is proposed: refine the scholarly question, identify appropriate designs and methods, and select outcomes. Refining the scholarly question requires careful attention to literature review, conceptual framework, and statements of problem and study intent. The authors emphasize statement of study intent, which is a study's focal point, and conceptual framework, which situates a project within a theoretical context and provides a means for interpreting the results. They then review study designs and methods commonly used in education projects. They conclude with outcomes, which should be distinguished from assessment methods and instruments, and are separated into Kirkpatrick's hierarchy of reaction, learning, behavior and results.

AB - Boyer and Glassick's broad definition of and standards for assessing scholarship apply to all aspects of education. Research on the quality of published medical education studies also reveals fundamentally important elements to address. In this article a three-step approach to developing medical education projects is proposed: refine the scholarly question, identify appropriate designs and methods, and select outcomes. Refining the scholarly question requires careful attention to literature review, conceptual framework, and statements of problem and study intent. The authors emphasize statement of study intent, which is a study's focal point, and conceptual framework, which situates a project within a theoretical context and provides a means for interpreting the results. They then review study designs and methods commonly used in education projects. They conclude with outcomes, which should be distinguished from assessment methods and instruments, and are separated into Kirkpatrick's hierarchy of reaction, learning, behavior and results.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34547996466&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34547996466&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01421590701291469

DO - 10.1080/01421590701291469

M3 - Article

C2 - 17701635

AN - SCOPUS:34547996466

VL - 29

SP - 210

EP - 218

JO - Medical Teacher

JF - Medical Teacher

SN - 0142-159X

IS - 2-3

ER -