TY - GEN
T1 - Developing an observational tool for reliably identifying work system factors in the operating room that impact cardiac surgical care
AU - Blocker, Renaldo C.
AU - Eggman, Ashley
AU - Zemple, Robert
AU - Wu, Chi Tao Elise
AU - Wiegmann, Douglas A.
PY - 2010/12/1
Y1 - 2010/12/1
N2 - The objective of this study is to develop a reliable Tablet-PC based observational tool for identifying work systems factors that impact cardiac surgical care. Using the tool we observed 26 open heart surgeries over a five-month period. In thirteen of the 26 observations, both observers stood in the same location and in the other thirteen cases the observers stood in different locations within the operation room (OR). The surgical cases typically last five hours and were conducted in multiple operating rooms within the hospital and with mixed surgical teams. There was an average of 8.49 flow disruptions per hour related to work system factors with an average of 42.45 disruptions per case. Results revealed that inter-rater reliability in identifying work system factors that disrupted surgical flow was roughly 87% when observers were standing in the same location. However, when standing in different locations, the reliability decreased to an average of 75%.
AB - The objective of this study is to develop a reliable Tablet-PC based observational tool for identifying work systems factors that impact cardiac surgical care. Using the tool we observed 26 open heart surgeries over a five-month period. In thirteen of the 26 observations, both observers stood in the same location and in the other thirteen cases the observers stood in different locations within the operation room (OR). The surgical cases typically last five hours and were conducted in multiple operating rooms within the hospital and with mixed surgical teams. There was an average of 8.49 flow disruptions per hour related to work system factors with an average of 42.45 disruptions per case. Results revealed that inter-rater reliability in identifying work system factors that disrupted surgical flow was roughly 87% when observers were standing in the same location. However, when standing in different locations, the reliability decreased to an average of 75%.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952902726&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952902726&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1518/107118110X12829369606648
DO - 10.1518/107118110X12829369606648
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:79952902726
SN - 9781617820885
T3 - Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
SP - 879
EP - 883
BT - 54th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2010, HFES 2010
T2 - 54th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2010, HFES 2010
Y2 - 27 September 2010 through 1 October 2010
ER -