TY - JOUR
T1 - Developing a standardized healthcare cost data warehouse
AU - Visscher, Sue L.
AU - Naessens, James M.
AU - Yawn, Barbara P.
AU - Reinalda, Megan S.
AU - Anderson, Stephanie S.
AU - Borah, Bijan J.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was made possible using the resources of the Rochester Epidemiology Project, which is supported by the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01AG034676. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The authors thank James P. Moriarty, M.S. for reviewing the Additional files 1 and 2, Additional files 3 and 4: Tables S1 and S2.
Funding Information:
Drs. Visscher’s and Borah’s efforts were funded by the Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Author(s).
PY - 2017/6/12
Y1 - 2017/6/12
N2 - Background: Research addressing value in healthcare requires a measure of cost. While there are many sources and types of cost data, each has strengths and weaknesses. Many researchers appear to create study-specific cost datasets, but the explanations of their costing methodologies are not always clear, causing their results to be difficult to interpret. Our solution, described in this paper, was to use widely accepted costing methodologies to create a service-level, standardized healthcare cost data warehouse from an institutional perspective that includes all professional and hospital-billed services for our patients. Methods: The warehouse is based on a National Institutes of Research-funded research infrastructure containing the linked health records and medical care administrative data of two healthcare providers and their affiliated hospitals. Since all patients are identified in the data warehouse, their costs can be linked to other systems and databases, such as electronic health records, tumor registries, and disease or treatment registries. Results: We describe the two institutions' administrative source data; the reference files, which include Medicare fee schedules and cost reports; the process of creating standardized costs; and the warehouse structure. The costing algorithm can create inflation-adjusted standardized costs at the service line level for defined study cohorts on request. Conclusion: The resulting standardized costs contained in the data warehouse can be used to create detailed, bottom-up analyses of professional and facility costs of procedures, medical conditions, and patient care cycles without revealing business-sensitive information. After its creation, a standardized cost data warehouse is relatively easy to maintain and can be expanded to include data from other providers. Individual investigators who may not have sufficient knowledge about administrative data do not have to try to create their own standardized costs on a project-by-project basis because our data warehouse generates standardized costs for defined cohorts upon request.
AB - Background: Research addressing value in healthcare requires a measure of cost. While there are many sources and types of cost data, each has strengths and weaknesses. Many researchers appear to create study-specific cost datasets, but the explanations of their costing methodologies are not always clear, causing their results to be difficult to interpret. Our solution, described in this paper, was to use widely accepted costing methodologies to create a service-level, standardized healthcare cost data warehouse from an institutional perspective that includes all professional and hospital-billed services for our patients. Methods: The warehouse is based on a National Institutes of Research-funded research infrastructure containing the linked health records and medical care administrative data of two healthcare providers and their affiliated hospitals. Since all patients are identified in the data warehouse, their costs can be linked to other systems and databases, such as electronic health records, tumor registries, and disease or treatment registries. Results: We describe the two institutions' administrative source data; the reference files, which include Medicare fee schedules and cost reports; the process of creating standardized costs; and the warehouse structure. The costing algorithm can create inflation-adjusted standardized costs at the service line level for defined study cohorts on request. Conclusion: The resulting standardized costs contained in the data warehouse can be used to create detailed, bottom-up analyses of professional and facility costs of procedures, medical conditions, and patient care cycles without revealing business-sensitive information. After its creation, a standardized cost data warehouse is relatively easy to maintain and can be expanded to include data from other providers. Individual investigators who may not have sufficient knowledge about administrative data do not have to try to create their own standardized costs on a project-by-project basis because our data warehouse generates standardized costs for defined cohorts upon request.
KW - Cost data warehouse
KW - Microcosting
KW - Olmsted County Healthcare Expenditure and Utilization Database (OCHEUD)
KW - Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP)
KW - Standardized healthcare costs
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020387115&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85020387115&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12913-017-2327-8
DO - 10.1186/s12913-017-2327-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 28606088
AN - SCOPUS:85020387115
SN - 1472-6963
VL - 17
JO - BMC Health Services Research
JF - BMC Health Services Research
IS - 1
M1 - 396
ER -