Developing a Conversation Aid to Support Shared Decision Making: Reflections on Designing Anticoagulation Choice

Shared Decision Making for Atrial Fibrillation (SDM4AFib) Trial Investigators

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Patient-centered care requires that treatments respond to the problematic situation of each patient in a manner that makes intellectual, emotional, and practical sense, an achievement that requires shared decision making (SDM). To implement SDM in practice, tools—sometimes called conversation aids or decision aids—are prepared by collating, curating, and presenting high-quality, comprehensive, and up-to-date evidence. Yet, the literature offers limited guidance for how to make evidence support SDM. Herein, we describe our approach and the challenges encountered during the development of Anticoagulation Choice, a conversation aid to help patients with atrial fibrillation and their clinicians jointly consider the risk of thromboembolic stroke and decide whether and how to respond to this risk with anticoagulation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalMayo Clinic Proceedings
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Patient-Centered Care
Decision Support Techniques
Atrial Fibrillation
Stroke
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Developing a Conversation Aid to Support Shared Decision Making : Reflections on Designing Anticoagulation Choice. / Shared Decision Making for Atrial Fibrillation (SDM4AFib) Trial Investigators.

In: Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shared Decision Making for Atrial Fibrillation (SDM4AFib) Trial Investigators. / Developing a Conversation Aid to Support Shared Decision Making : Reflections on Designing Anticoagulation Choice. In: Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2019.
@article{b30b14d076444b63949da355811be9b3,
title = "Developing a Conversation Aid to Support Shared Decision Making: Reflections on Designing Anticoagulation Choice",
abstract = "Patient-centered care requires that treatments respond to the problematic situation of each patient in a manner that makes intellectual, emotional, and practical sense, an achievement that requires shared decision making (SDM). To implement SDM in practice, tools—sometimes called conversation aids or decision aids—are prepared by collating, curating, and presenting high-quality, comprehensive, and up-to-date evidence. Yet, the literature offers limited guidance for how to make evidence support SDM. Herein, we describe our approach and the challenges encountered during the development of Anticoagulation Choice, a conversation aid to help patients with atrial fibrillation and their clinicians jointly consider the risk of thromboembolic stroke and decide whether and how to respond to this risk with anticoagulation.",
author = "{Shared Decision Making for Atrial Fibrillation (SDM4AFib) Trial Investigators} and Zeballos-Palacios, {Claudia L.} and Hargraves, {Ian G.} and Peter Noseworthy and Branda, {Megan E.} and Marleen Kunneman and Bruce Burnett and Gionfriddo, {Michael R.} and McLeod, {Christopher J.} and Haeshik Gorr and {Brito Campana}, Juan and Montori, {Victor Manuel}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.08.030",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Mayo Clinic Proceedings",
issn = "0025-6196",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Developing a Conversation Aid to Support Shared Decision Making

T2 - Reflections on Designing Anticoagulation Choice

AU - Shared Decision Making for Atrial Fibrillation (SDM4AFib) Trial Investigators

AU - Zeballos-Palacios, Claudia L.

AU - Hargraves, Ian G.

AU - Noseworthy, Peter

AU - Branda, Megan E.

AU - Kunneman, Marleen

AU - Burnett, Bruce

AU - Gionfriddo, Michael R.

AU - McLeod, Christopher J.

AU - Gorr, Haeshik

AU - Brito Campana, Juan

AU - Montori, Victor Manuel

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Patient-centered care requires that treatments respond to the problematic situation of each patient in a manner that makes intellectual, emotional, and practical sense, an achievement that requires shared decision making (SDM). To implement SDM in practice, tools—sometimes called conversation aids or decision aids—are prepared by collating, curating, and presenting high-quality, comprehensive, and up-to-date evidence. Yet, the literature offers limited guidance for how to make evidence support SDM. Herein, we describe our approach and the challenges encountered during the development of Anticoagulation Choice, a conversation aid to help patients with atrial fibrillation and their clinicians jointly consider the risk of thromboembolic stroke and decide whether and how to respond to this risk with anticoagulation.

AB - Patient-centered care requires that treatments respond to the problematic situation of each patient in a manner that makes intellectual, emotional, and practical sense, an achievement that requires shared decision making (SDM). To implement SDM in practice, tools—sometimes called conversation aids or decision aids—are prepared by collating, curating, and presenting high-quality, comprehensive, and up-to-date evidence. Yet, the literature offers limited guidance for how to make evidence support SDM. Herein, we describe our approach and the challenges encountered during the development of Anticoagulation Choice, a conversation aid to help patients with atrial fibrillation and their clinicians jointly consider the risk of thromboembolic stroke and decide whether and how to respond to this risk with anticoagulation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059782121&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059782121&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.08.030

DO - 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.08.030

M3 - Article

C2 - 30642640

AN - SCOPUS:85059782121

JO - Mayo Clinic Proceedings

JF - Mayo Clinic Proceedings

SN - 0025-6196

ER -