Determining Perioperative Complications Associated with Vaginal Hysterectomy: Code Classification Versus Chart Review

Christine A. Heisler, L. Joseph Melton, Amy L. Weaver, John B. Gebhart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Improvement in outcomes after vaginal hysterectomy (VH) requires accurate identification of complications. We hypothesized that coded data, commonly used to determine morbidity, would miss more complications than chart review would. Study Design: Medical records of women who underwent VH from January 2004 through December 2005 were reviewed for cardiac or respiratory arrest, congestive heart failure, pulmonary edema, pulmonary embolism, urinary tract infection, ureteral obstruction, hemorrhage, and delirium. Complications were identified with use of coded data, in which diagnoses were classified with a modification of the Hospital Adaptation of the International Classification of Diseases. Results: Records of 712 patients were reviewed. Of the 161 complications identified, 158 (98.1%) were identified through chart review and 48 (29.8%) through coded data. Codes captured all diagnoses of cardiac arrest, respiratory arrest, and pulmonary embolism but missed other complications. Conclusions: Codes captured life-threatening complications, but other complications were underestimated or missed entirely. Reliance on coded data for outcomes assessments can be misleading and should be combined with other methods to maximize validity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)119-122
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume209
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2009

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Determining Perioperative Complications Associated with Vaginal Hysterectomy: Code Classification Versus Chart Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this