Determinants of maximal force transmission in a motor-clutch model of cell traction in a compliant microenvironment

Benjamin L. Bangasser, Steven Rosenfeld, David J. Odde

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

62 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The mechanical stiffness of a cell's environment exerts a strong, but variable, influence on cell behavior and fate. For example, different cell types cultured on compliant substrates have opposite trends of cell migration and traction as a function of substrate stiffness. Here, we describe how a motor-clutch model of cell traction, which exhibits a maximum in traction force with respect to substrate stiffness, may provide a mechanistic basis for understanding how cells are tuned to sense the stiffness of specific microenvironments. We find that the optimal stiffness is generally more sensitive to clutch parameters than to motor parameters, but that single parameter changes are generally only effective over a small range of values. By contrast, dual parameter changes, such as coordinately increasing the numbers of both motors and clutches offer a larger dynamic range for tuning the optimum. The model exhibits distinct regimes: at high substrate stiffness, clutches quickly build force and fail (so-called frictional slippage), whereas at low substrate stiffness, clutches fail spontaneously before the motors can load the substrate appreciably (a second regime of frictional slippage). Between the two extremes, we find the maximum traction force, which occurs when the substrate load-and-fail cycle time equals the expected time for all clutches to bind. At this stiffness, clutches are used to their fullest extent, and motors are therefore resisted to their fullest extent. The analysis suggests that coordinate parameter shifts, such as increasing the numbers of motors and clutches, could underlie tumor progression and collective cell migration.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)581-592
Number of pages12
JournalBiophysical Journal
Volume105
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 6 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Traction
Cell Movement
Cultured Cells
Neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics

Cite this

Determinants of maximal force transmission in a motor-clutch model of cell traction in a compliant microenvironment. / Bangasser, Benjamin L.; Rosenfeld, Steven; Odde, David J.

In: Biophysical Journal, Vol. 105, No. 3, 06.08.2013, p. 581-592.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dd874217d84e42178c6105006e213f72,
title = "Determinants of maximal force transmission in a motor-clutch model of cell traction in a compliant microenvironment",
abstract = "The mechanical stiffness of a cell's environment exerts a strong, but variable, influence on cell behavior and fate. For example, different cell types cultured on compliant substrates have opposite trends of cell migration and traction as a function of substrate stiffness. Here, we describe how a motor-clutch model of cell traction, which exhibits a maximum in traction force with respect to substrate stiffness, may provide a mechanistic basis for understanding how cells are tuned to sense the stiffness of specific microenvironments. We find that the optimal stiffness is generally more sensitive to clutch parameters than to motor parameters, but that single parameter changes are generally only effective over a small range of values. By contrast, dual parameter changes, such as coordinately increasing the numbers of both motors and clutches offer a larger dynamic range for tuning the optimum. The model exhibits distinct regimes: at high substrate stiffness, clutches quickly build force and fail (so-called frictional slippage), whereas at low substrate stiffness, clutches fail spontaneously before the motors can load the substrate appreciably (a second regime of frictional slippage). Between the two extremes, we find the maximum traction force, which occurs when the substrate load-and-fail cycle time equals the expected time for all clutches to bind. At this stiffness, clutches are used to their fullest extent, and motors are therefore resisted to their fullest extent. The analysis suggests that coordinate parameter shifts, such as increasing the numbers of motors and clutches, could underlie tumor progression and collective cell migration.",
author = "Bangasser, {Benjamin L.} and Steven Rosenfeld and Odde, {David J.}",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.bpj.2013.06.027",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "105",
pages = "581--592",
journal = "Biophysical Journal",
issn = "0006-3495",
publisher = "Biophysical Society",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Determinants of maximal force transmission in a motor-clutch model of cell traction in a compliant microenvironment

AU - Bangasser, Benjamin L.

AU - Rosenfeld, Steven

AU - Odde, David J.

PY - 2013/8/6

Y1 - 2013/8/6

N2 - The mechanical stiffness of a cell's environment exerts a strong, but variable, influence on cell behavior and fate. For example, different cell types cultured on compliant substrates have opposite trends of cell migration and traction as a function of substrate stiffness. Here, we describe how a motor-clutch model of cell traction, which exhibits a maximum in traction force with respect to substrate stiffness, may provide a mechanistic basis for understanding how cells are tuned to sense the stiffness of specific microenvironments. We find that the optimal stiffness is generally more sensitive to clutch parameters than to motor parameters, but that single parameter changes are generally only effective over a small range of values. By contrast, dual parameter changes, such as coordinately increasing the numbers of both motors and clutches offer a larger dynamic range for tuning the optimum. The model exhibits distinct regimes: at high substrate stiffness, clutches quickly build force and fail (so-called frictional slippage), whereas at low substrate stiffness, clutches fail spontaneously before the motors can load the substrate appreciably (a second regime of frictional slippage). Between the two extremes, we find the maximum traction force, which occurs when the substrate load-and-fail cycle time equals the expected time for all clutches to bind. At this stiffness, clutches are used to their fullest extent, and motors are therefore resisted to their fullest extent. The analysis suggests that coordinate parameter shifts, such as increasing the numbers of motors and clutches, could underlie tumor progression and collective cell migration.

AB - The mechanical stiffness of a cell's environment exerts a strong, but variable, influence on cell behavior and fate. For example, different cell types cultured on compliant substrates have opposite trends of cell migration and traction as a function of substrate stiffness. Here, we describe how a motor-clutch model of cell traction, which exhibits a maximum in traction force with respect to substrate stiffness, may provide a mechanistic basis for understanding how cells are tuned to sense the stiffness of specific microenvironments. We find that the optimal stiffness is generally more sensitive to clutch parameters than to motor parameters, but that single parameter changes are generally only effective over a small range of values. By contrast, dual parameter changes, such as coordinately increasing the numbers of both motors and clutches offer a larger dynamic range for tuning the optimum. The model exhibits distinct regimes: at high substrate stiffness, clutches quickly build force and fail (so-called frictional slippage), whereas at low substrate stiffness, clutches fail spontaneously before the motors can load the substrate appreciably (a second regime of frictional slippage). Between the two extremes, we find the maximum traction force, which occurs when the substrate load-and-fail cycle time equals the expected time for all clutches to bind. At this stiffness, clutches are used to their fullest extent, and motors are therefore resisted to their fullest extent. The analysis suggests that coordinate parameter shifts, such as increasing the numbers of motors and clutches, could underlie tumor progression and collective cell migration.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881446010&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84881446010&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.06.027

DO - 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.06.027

M3 - Article

VL - 105

SP - 581

EP - 592

JO - Biophysical Journal

JF - Biophysical Journal

SN - 0006-3495

IS - 3

ER -